IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v65y2022i5p671-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational CQ: Cultural intelligence for 21st-century organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Livermore, David
  • Van Dyne, Linn
  • Ang, Soon

Abstract

We live in an age of massive global disruption. Technological advancements threaten century-old business models, globalization is reordering supply chains, and people need to work with colleagues and customers who have vastly different backgrounds. On top of that, we have been in the midst of a global pandemic, and customers, employers, and investors are demanding more than just a Black Lives Matter social media post from organizations that purport to take social justice seriously. Organizations with high cultural intelligence (CQ) are able to navigate this volatility and complexity effectively. Over the last two decades, scholars from across the world have published hundreds of articles on CQ, the capability to relate and work effectively in complex, culturally diverse situations. Most of the work has examined CQ at the individual level. But what about organizations? Can organizations be culturally intelligent? The emerging research on CQ at the organizational level offers leaders and organizations critical insights for navigating today’s diverse, digital world. Organizational CQ is a firm’s capability to function effectively in a complex and unpredictable multicultural world. This article stresses the importance of the culturally intelligent organization and explains how to develop organizational CQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Livermore, David & Van Dyne, Linn & Ang, Soon, 2022. "Organizational CQ: Cultural intelligence for 21st-century organizations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 671-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:65:y:2022:i:5:p:671-680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681321002032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rockstuhl, Thomas & Van Dyne, Linn, 2018. "A bi-factor theory of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence: Meta-analysis and theoretical extensions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 124-144.
    2. Michael A. Hitt & Jean‐Luc Arregle & R. Michael Holmes, 2021. "Strategic Management Theory in a Post‐Pandemic and Non‐Ergodic World," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 259-264, January.
    3. Elia, Gianluca & Margherita, Alessandro, 2018. "Can we solve wicked problems? A conceptual framework and a collective intelligence system to support problem analysis and solution design for complex social issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 279-286.
    4. Stacey R Fitzsimmons & Yuan Liao & David C Thomas, 2017. "From crossing cultures to straddling them: An empirical examination of outcomes for multicultural employees," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(1), pages 63-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Puhr, Harald & Müllner, Jakob, 2022. "Foreign to all but fluent in many: The effect of multinationality on shock resilience," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    2. Ilya R. P. Cuypers & Gokhan Ertug & John Cantwell & Akbar Zaheer & Martin Kilduff, 2020. "Making connections: Social networks in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(5), pages 714-736, July.
    3. Gyeongcheol Cho & Christopher Schlaegel & Heungsun Hwang & Younyoung Choi & Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle, 2022. "Integrated Generalized Structured Component Analysis: On the Use of Model Fit Criteria in International Management Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 569-609, August.
    4. Petr Wawrosz & Miroslav Jurásek, 2021. "Developing Intercultural Efficiency: The Relationship between Cultural Intelligence and Self-Efficacy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Tavoletti, Ernesto & Stephens, Robert D. & Taras, Vas & Dong, Longzhu, 2022. "Nationality biases in peer evaluations: The country-of-origin effect in global virtual teams," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    6. Ilse Hellemans & Amanda J. Porter & Damla Diriker, 2022. "Harnessing digitalization for sustainable development: Understanding how interactions on sustainability‐oriented digital platforms manage tensions and paradoxes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 668-683, February.
    7. Judit Garamvölgyi & Ildikó Rudnák, 2023. "Exploring the Relationship between Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Management Competencies (MC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Abdel-Rahim, Heba Y. & Lorenz, Melanie P. & Zaher, Angie Abdel, 2022. "How do cultural difference, cultural exposure, and CQ affect interpretations of trust from contract choices? Evidence from dyadic cross-country experiments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Eunbi Kim, 2023. "Top management staffing and subsidiary performance under home-country uncertainty," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1513-1543, September.
    10. Guillaume Plaisance, 2023. "Accountability in French non-profit organizations: between paradox and complexity," Post-Print hal-04430976, HAL.
    11. Herman Aguinis & Wayne F. Cascio & Ravi S. Ramani, 2017. "Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(6), pages 653-663, August.
    12. Rubina Romanello & Maria Chiarvesio, 2019. "Early internationalizing firms: 2004–2018," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 172-219, June.
    13. Peltokorpi, Vesa & Zhang, Ling Eleanor, 2022. "Host country culture and language identification, and their workplace manifestations: A study on corporate expatriates in China and Japan," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    14. Gianluca Elia & Alessandro Margherita & Claudio Petti, 2020. "Building responses to sustainable development challenges: A multistakeholder collaboration framework and application to climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2465-2478, September.
    15. Harrison, Kristina & Ford, John & Karande, Kiran & Merchant, Altaf & Zhang, Weiyong, 2022. "The development and validation of a Chinese American affiliation scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 331-345.
    16. Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Siti Hajar Othman & Biswajeet Pradhan & Simon Opper, 2022. "Developing Reusable COVID-19 Disaster Management Plans Using Agent-Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Presbitero, Alfred, 2020. "Foreign language skill, anxiety, cultural intelligence and individual task performance in global virtual teams: A cognitive perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2).
    18. Friederike Mathey & Evgenia I. Lysova & Svetlana N. Khapova, 2024. "How is social capital formed and leveraged in international careers? A systematic review and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1209-1248, September.
    19. Natasha Kunesch & Risa Morimoto, 2019. "The “wickedness†of trashing the plastics age: limitations of government policy in the case of the Philippines," Working Papers 231, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    20. Robbert Maseland & Douglas Dow & Piers Steel, 2018. "The Kogut and Singh national cultural distance index: Time to start using it as a springboard rather than a crutch," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1154-1166, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:65:y:2022:i:5:p:671-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.