IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v98y2012icp548-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving bioethanol production – Comparison between extractive and low temperature fermentation

Author

Listed:
  • Dias, M.O.S.
  • Junqueira, T.L.
  • Jesus, C.D.F.
  • Rossell, C.E.V.
  • Maciel Filho, R.
  • Bonomi, A.

Abstract

One of the key issues that must be addressed in the biofuel production based on sugarcane industry is the energy consumption of the process. Process energy demand has direct impact on the amount of lignocellulosic material available for use as feedstock for second generation ethanol production. A significant fraction of the energy consumption in bioethanol production occurs in the purification step, since conventional fermentation systems employed in the industry require low substrate concentration and, consequently, produce wine of low (around 8.5°GL) ethanol content that must be distilled in order to meet product specifications. In this study alternatives to the conventional fermentation processes employed in the industry (low temperature fermentation and vacuum extractive fermentation) were assessed, in the context of a large scale sugarcane autonomous distillery, through computer simulation. Electricity consumption and lignocellulosic material surplus on each case were evaluated. It is shown that the alternative fermentation processes allow a significant reduction on vinasse generation and increases ethanol production when compared with conventional fermentation, but increases electricity consumption (for the extractive fermentation) or steam consumption (for low temperature fermentation); when vinasse concentration is considered in the conventional process, steam consumption in the extractive fermentation is also significantly smaller.

Suggested Citation

  • Dias, M.O.S. & Junqueira, T.L. & Jesus, C.D.F. & Rossell, C.E.V. & Maciel Filho, R. & Bonomi, A., 2012. "Improving bioethanol production – Comparison between extractive and low temperature fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 548-555.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:98:y:2012:i:c:p:548-555
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261912003169
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. García, Carlos A. & Fuentes, Alfredo & Hennecke, Anna & Riegelhaupt, Enrique & Manzini, Fabio & Masera, Omar, 2011. "Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2088-2097, June.
    2. Morandin, Matteo & Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Maréchal, François & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A., 2011. "Synthesis and parameter optimization of a combined sugar and ethanol production process integrated with a CHP system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3675-3690.
    3. Somers, C. & Mortazavi, A. & Hwang, Y. & Radermacher, R. & Rodgers, P. & Al-Hashimi, S., 2011. "Modeling water/lithium bromide absorption chillers in ASPEN Plus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4197-4205.
    4. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2011. "Combined production of sugar, ethanol and electricity: Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3704-3715.
    5. Balat, Mustafa & Balat, Havva, 2009. "Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2273-2282, November.
    6. Gauder, Martin & Graeff-Hönninger, S. & Claupein, W., 2011. "The impact of a growing bioethanol industry on food production in Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 672-679, March.
    7. Starfelt, Fredrik & Daianova, Lilia & Yan, Jinyue & Thorin, Eva & Dotzauer, Erik, 2012. "The impact of lignocellulosic ethanol yields in polygeneration with district heating – A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 791-799.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Shuchi & Khanna, Swati & Moholkar, Vijayanand S. & Goyal, Arun, 2014. "Screening and optimization of pretreatments for Parthenium hysterophorus as feedstock for alcoholic biofuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 195-206.
    2. Kim, Jieun & Kim, Ki-Hyun & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2016. "Enhanced thermal cracking of VOCs evolved from the thermal degradation of lignin using CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 51-57.
    3. Dias, Marina O.S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Cavalett, Otávio & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cunha, Marcelo P. & Jesus, Charles D.F. & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Bonomi, Antonio, 2013. "Biorefineries for the production of first and second generation ethanol and electricity from sugarcane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 72-78.
    4. Leon, Juan A. & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Nebra, Silvia A., 2016. "Batch pervaporative fermentation with coupled membrane and its influence on energy consumption in permeate recovery and distillation stage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 77-91.
    5. Fan, Senqing & Xiao, Zeyi & Li, Minghai & Li, Sizhong, 2016. "Pervaporation membrane bioreactor with permeate fractional condensation and mechanical vapor compression for energy efficient ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 939-947.
    6. Chen, Wei-Cheng & Sheng, Chung-Teh & Liu, Yu-Cheng & Chen, Wei-Jen & Huang, Wen-Luh & Chang, Shih-Hsien & Chang, Wei-Che, 2014. "Optimizing the efficiency of anhydrous ethanol purification via regenerable molecular sieve," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 483-489.
    7. Milão, Raquel de Freitas Dias & Carminati, Hudson B. & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Thermodynamic, financial and resource assessments of a large-scale sugarcane-biorefinery: Prelude of full bioenergy carbon capture and storage scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Ntihuga, Jean Nepomuscene & Senn, Thomas & Gschwind, Peter & Kohlus, Reinhard, 2013. "An evaluation of different bioreactor configurations for continuous bio-ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 194-201.
    9. Larnaudie, Valeria & Rochón, Eloísa & Ferrari, Mario Daniel & Lareo, Claudia, 2016. "Energy evaluation of fuel bioethanol production from sweet sorghum using very high gravity (VHG) conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 280-287.
    10. Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Ensinas, Adriano & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, Silvia A., 2014. "New alternatives for the fermentation process in the ethanol production from sugarcane: Extractive and low temperature fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 595-604.
    11. Vasconcelos, Marcelo Holanda & Mendes, Fernanda Machado & Ramos, Lucas & Dias, Marina Oliveira S. & Bonomi, Antonio & Jesus, Charles Dayan F. & Watanabe, Marcos Djun B. & Junqueira, Tassia Lopes & Mil, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of bioenergy and biofuel production in integrated sugarcane biorefinery: Identification of technological bottlenecks and economic feasibility of dilute acid pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Mosqueira-Salazar, Klever Joao & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Serra, Luis M. & Lozano, Miguel-Angel, 2013. "Exergetic analysis of the integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 46-61.
    13. Schneider, Willian Daniel Hahn & Fontana, Roselei Claudete & Baudel, Henrique Macedo & de Siqueira, Félix Gonçalves & Rencoret, Jorge & Gutiérrez, Ana & de Eugenio, Laura Isabel & Prieto, Alicia & Mar, 2020. "Lignin degradation and detoxification of eucalyptus wastes by on-site manufacturing fungal enzymes to enhance second-generation ethanol yield," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dias, Marina O.S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Jesus, Charles D.F. & Rossell, Carlos E.V. & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Bonomi, Antonio, 2012. "Improving second generation ethanol production through optimization of first generation production process from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 246-252.
    2. Kravanja, Philipp & Modarresi, Ala & Friedl, Anton, 2013. "Heat integration of biochemical ethanol production from straw – A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 32-43.
    3. Fan, Senqing & Xiao, Zeyi & Li, Minghai & Li, Sizhong, 2016. "Pervaporation membrane bioreactor with permeate fractional condensation and mechanical vapor compression for energy efficient ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 939-947.
    4. Ho, Cheng-Yu & Chang, Jui-Jen & Lee, Shih-Chi & Chin, Tsu-Yuan & Shih, Ming-Che & Li, Wen-Hsiung & Huang, Chieh-Chen, 2012. "Development of cellulosic ethanol production process via co-culturing of artificial cellulosomal Bacillus and kefir yeast," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-32.
    5. Antonio Bizzo, Waldir & Lenço, Paulo César & Carvalho, Danilo José & Veiga, João Paulo Soto, 2014. "The generation of residual biomass during the production of bio-ethanol from sugarcane, its characterization and its use in energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 589-603.
    6. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Díaz Pérez, Álvaro A. & Escobar Palacio, José C. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Martínez Reyes, Arnaldo M. & Rúa Orozco, Dimas J. & Silva Lora, Electo E. & Almazán del Olmo, Oscar A., 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of reheat and regeneration alternatives in cogeneration systems of the Brazilian sugarcane and alcohol sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 247-262.
    8. Saari, Jussi & Sermyagina, Ekaterina & Kaikko, Juha & Vakkilainen, Esa & Sergeev, Vitaly, 2016. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization and a CHP plant: Part 2 –operational and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 574-585.
    9. Avelino Gonçalves, Fabiano & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro, 2015. "Use of cultivars of low cost, agroindustrial and urban waste in the production of cellulosic ethanol in Brazil: A proposal to utilization of microdistillery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1287-1303.
    10. Pina, Eduardo A. & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Chavez-Rodriguez, Mauro F. & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, Silvia A., 2017. "Reduction of process steam demand and water-usage through heat integration in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane – Evaluation of different plant configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1263-1280.
    11. Yasuda, Masahide & Matsumoto, Tomoko & Yamashita, Toshiaki, 2018. "Sacrificial hydrogen production over TiO2-based photocatalysts: Polyols, carboxylic acids, and saccharides," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1627-1635.
    12. Bharathiraja, B. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Sudharsanaa, T. & Bharghavi, A. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chakravarthy, M. & Yuvaraj, D., 2017. "Biobutanol – An impending biofuel for future: A review on upstream and downstream processing tecniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 788-807.
    13. Jayasekara, Saliya & Halgamuge, Saman K., 2013. "Mathematical modeling and experimental verification of an absorption chiller including three dimensional temperature and concentration distributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 232-242.
    14. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Fodor, Zsófia & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2012. "Total Site targeting with process specific minimum temperature difference (ΔTmin)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 20-28.
    16. Calise, Francesco & Cipollina, Andrea & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Piacentino, Antonio, 2014. "A novel renewable polygeneration system for a small Mediterranean volcanic island for the combined production of energy and water: Dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 675-693.
    17. Sánchez, S. & Lozano, L.J. & Godínez, C. & Juan, D. & Pérez, A. & Hernández, F.J., 2010. "Carob pod as a feedstock for the production of bioethanol in Mediterranean areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3417-3424, November.
    18. Jin, Wenxiang & Chen, Ling & Hu, Meng & Sun, Dan & Li, Ao & Li, Ying & Hu, Zhen & Zhou, Shiguang & Tu, Yuanyuan & Xia, Tao & Wang, Yanting & Xie, Guosheng & Li, Yanbin & Bai, Baowei & Peng, Liangcai, 2016. "Tween-80 is effective for enhancing steam-exploded biomass enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production by specifically lessening cellulase absorption with lignin in common reed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 82-90.
    19. Phanankosi Moyo & Mahluli Moyo & Donatus Dube & Oswell Rusinga, 2013. "Biofuel Policy as a Key Driver for Sustainable Development in the Biofuel Sector: The Missing Ingredient in Zimbabwe’s Biofuel Pursuit," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-36, February.
    20. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:98:y:2012:i:c:p:548-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.