IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v377y2025ipds0306261924020452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and energy, exergy, thermoeconomic, and exergo-environmental (4E) analyses of a novel hybrid geothermal/biogas-powered green multi-generation system using a post-combustion CO2 capture unit

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jian
  • Hsu, Chou-Yi
  • Ahmad, Sayed Fayaz
  • Alotaibi, Majed A.
  • Allahham, Mahmoud Izzat
  • Qin, Muxing

Abstract

This research introduces a novel multigeneration method that enables the simultaneous generation of electrical power, fresh water, hydrogen, hot water, and cold water. The energy required for this process is derived from geothermal fluid and biogas. A post-combustion mechanism is used in this novel method to separate carbon dioxide and reduce emissions. In addition, the heat produced by burning biogas is used in an organic Rankine cycle to generate power, which is thermally integrated with a Kalina cycle. The waste heat generated by the Kalina cycle is applied to produce hot water and facilitate fluid evaporation in the vapor generator of the absorption chiller cycle. Hydrogen is generated in a PEM electrolyzer, where the necessary electricity is provided directly within the system. A exergy analysis was performed to determine the system's irreversibility and pinpoint the area with the greatest exergy destruction. The findings revealed that the overall exergy destruction of this system is 17,412 kW, with the combustion reactor being the primary contributor, responsible for 63.2 % of the irreversibility. Furthermore, the study revealed that the evaporator in the absorption chiller cycle has the greatest value for the parameter known as the “ environmental damage effectiveness factor.” To tackle this problem, a remedy was suggested during the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that raising the feed temperature of the stripper column in the post-combustion section can improve both energy and exergy efficiency, without any impact on the production rate. The modeling results obtained using Aspen HYSYS indicate that the suggested process has exergy efficiency, electrical efficiency and energy efficiency and values of 23.67 %, 16.38 % and 51.15 %, respectively. In addition, the thermoeconomic evaluation demonstrated that the annual cost of this new process amounts to 11,255,260 $. Taking into account the production rate of the system, the key parameter levelized cost of energy was calculated to be 0.1172 $/kWh. An analysis of different parameters showed that raising the temperature of the feed in the stripper column to 118 °C can result in a decrease in the levelized cost of energy by $0.085/kWh due to a reduction in geothermal energy consumption. Additionally, this modification resulted in an enhancement of the energy efficiency and exergy efficiency to 77 % and 26 %, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jian & Hsu, Chou-Yi & Ahmad, Sayed Fayaz & Alotaibi, Majed A. & Allahham, Mahmoud Izzat & Qin, Muxing, 2025. "Design and energy, exergy, thermoeconomic, and exergo-environmental (4E) analyses of a novel hybrid geothermal/biogas-powered green multi-generation system using a post-combustion CO2 capture unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pd:s0306261924020452
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924020452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pd:s0306261924020452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.