IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v345y2023ics0306261923006578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemical looping combustion oxygen carrier production cost study

Author

Listed:
  • Newby, Richard A.
  • Keairns, Dale L.
  • Stevens, Robert W.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of commercial production of oxygen carriers (OCs) for large-scale application in a mature, chemical looping combustion (CLC) power generation industry. Estimates of cost were made for two production facility scenarios: (1) build and operate an on-site, OC production facility located at a 550 MW CLC power plant site; and (2) build and operate a central production facility to produce and distribute OCs to the U.S. CLC power generation industry. Two OC production techniques were addressed: mechanical mixing and co-precipitation. Representative OCs that have production raw materials with sufficient commercial availability to support a CLC industry are ilmenite, a natural OC, and four engineered OC types, Fe2O3-based, CuO-based, NiO-based, and CuFeAlO4-based, with candidate OC support materials Al2O3 and TiO2. The costs of the OC production raw materials represent the major portion of the OC product cost; the OC production cost, in dollars per kg, has been found to be nearly a linear function of the OC raw materials cost, in dollars per kg. The estimated OC product costs can be used to estimate the maximum OC loss rate yielding a designated CLC power plant cost-of-electricity (COE) target as a development guide, and it has been found that the maximum OC makeup rate, in kg per hour, achieving a designated COE reduction goal relative to a conventional pulverized coal (PC) power plant, will be nearly inversely proportional to the OC production raw materials cost, in dollars per kg.

Suggested Citation

  • Newby, Richard A. & Keairns, Dale L. & Stevens, Robert W., 2023. "Chemical looping combustion oxygen carrier production cost study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:345:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923006578
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923006578
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Ming & Yi, Yang & Wang, Shuzhong & Wang, Zhuliang & Du, Min & Pan, Jianfeng & Wang, Qian, 2018. "Review of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3186-3214.
    2. Nandy, Anirban & Loha, Chanchal & Gu, Sai & Sarkar, Pinaki & Karmakar, Malay K. & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2016. "Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 597-619.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Chein, Rei-Yu & Hsu, Wen-Huai, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of syngas production via chemical looping dry reforming of methane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 535-547.
    3. Ben-Mansour, R. & Li, H. & Habib, M.A., 2017. "Effects of oxygen carrier mole fraction, velocity distribution on conversion performance using an experimentally validated mathematical model of a CLC fuel reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 803-819.
    4. Wang, Xun & Fu, Genshen & Xiao, Bo & Xu, Tingting, 2022. "Optimization of nickel-iron bimetallic oxides for coproduction of hydrogen and syngas in chemical looping reforming with water splitting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Wang, Haiming & Liu, Guicai & Veksha, Andrei & Giannis, Apostolos & Lim, Teik-Thye & Lisak, Grzegorz, 2021. "Effective H2S control during chemical looping combustion by iron ore modified with alkaline earth metal oxides," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Yin, Fan & Sun, Liyan & Zeng, Dewang & Gao, Zixiang & Xiao, Rui, 2024. "Investigations on oxygen carriers derived from natural ores or industrial solid wastes for chemical looping hydrogen generation using biomass pyrolysis gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Lu, Chunqiang & Li, Kongzhai & Zhu, Xing & Wei, Yonggang & Li, Lei & Zheng, Min & Fan, Bingbing & He, Fang & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Improved activity of magnetite oxygen carrier for chemical looping steam reforming by ultrasonic treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    9. Huang, Jijiang & Liu, Wen & Hu, Wenting & Metcalfe, Ian & Yang, Yanhui & Liu, Bin, 2019. "Phase interactions in Ni-Cu-Al2O3 mixed oxide oxygen carriers for chemical looping applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 635-647.
    10. Jiang, Dianqiang & Zhang, Dalin & Li, Xinyu & Wang, Shibao & Wang, Chenglong & Qin, Hao & Guo, Yanwen & Tian, Wenxi & Su, G.H. & Qiu, Suizheng, 2022. "Fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactors: Review of historical milestones, research status, challenges, and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Chen, Zong & Zhang, Rongjun & Xia, Guofu & Wu, Yu & Li, Hongwei & Sun, Zhao & Sun, Zhiqiang, 2021. "Vacuum promoted methane decomposition for hydrogen production with carbon separation: Parameter optimization and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Babak Salamatinia & Bahman Amini Horri, 2022. "A Review on Recent Progress in the Integrated Green Hydrogen Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, February.
    13. Khakpoor, Nima & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader & De la Hoz Siegler, Hector, 2019. "Oxygen transport capacity and kinetic study of ilmenite ores for methane chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 329-337.
    14. Zhang, Jinzhi & He, Tao & Wang, Zhiqi & Zhu, Min & Zhang, Ke & Li, Bin & Wu, Jinhu, 2017. "The search of proper oxygen carriers for chemical looping partial oxidation of carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1119-1125.
    15. Nurdiawati, Anissa & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Irhamna, Adrian Rizqi & Sasongko, Dwiwahju & Aziz, Muhammad, 2019. "Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 369-381.
    16. Zhang, Haotian & Sun, Zhuxing & Hu, Yun Hang, 2021. "Steam reforming of methane: Current states of catalyst design and process upgrading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Ma, Zhong & Liu, Guofu & Zhang, Hui & Zhang, Shuai & Lu, Yonggang, 2021. "Evaluation of pyrite cinders from sulfuric acid production as oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Yaqub, Z.T. & Oboirien, B.O. & Leion, H., 2024. "Process optimization of chemical looping combustion of solid waste/biomass using machine learning algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Zain, Munirah Md & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2018. "An overview on conversion technologies to produce value added products from CH4 and CO2 as major biogas constituents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 56-63.
    20. Beatrice Muriungi & Lijun Wang & Abolghasem Shahbazi, 2020. "Comparison of Bimetallic Fe-Cu and Fe-Ca Oxygen Carriers for Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:345:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923006578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.