IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v318y2022ics0306261922005724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial park heat integration considering centralized and distributed waste heat recovery cycle systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ji, Feng
  • Dong, Yachao
  • Sun, Xiaojing
  • Liu, Linlin
  • Du, Jian

Abstract

The waste heat recovery cycle, such as Organic Rankine cycle and absorption refrigeration cycle, can convert waste heat to other forms of energy (heat, cooling and electricity) efficiently. Meanwhile, besides the traditional intra-plant energy utilization, the cluster of enterprises in an industrial park brings extra opportunities and benefits for the total site energy recovery and conversion. Therefore, in order to improve the energy utilization efficiency and reduce the overall cost, an optimization-based framework that enables the simultaneous integration of heat exchanger network, utility and waste heat recovery cycle systems of industrial parks is proposed in this study. Three heat integration technologies are simultaneously considered to achieve the design purpose, including the direct heat integration inside plants, the indirect heat integration across different plants, and the integration of heat exchanger network with waste heat recovery cycle systems. Two waste heat recovery cycle systems configuration modes, centralized and distributed, are proposed to achieve the flexible utilization of waste heat in industrial parks. A mathematical model in mixed integer nonlinear programming is formulated to optimize the design scheme subjecting to the objective of minimum total annualized cost. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by two cases studies, and the applicable scenarios for the two waste heat recovery cycle modes are revealed by comparing and analyzing the economic performance of the total site systems. It is concluded that the two waste heat recovery cycle configuration modes do have specific conditions of applicability, that is, the distributed mode is the better choice if the utility cost plus transportation cost of the entire system dominates the total cost, conversely, the centralized mode is recommended. The results also indicate that the inter-plant distance is an important factor affecting decision making, so sensitivity analysis is subsequently conducted and indicates that the distributed mode is preferable only if a specific threshold of inter-plant distance is exceeded.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji, Feng & Dong, Yachao & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2022. "Industrial park heat integration considering centralized and distributed waste heat recovery cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:318:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922005724
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922005724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao Sheng & Linlin Liu & Yu Zhuang & Lei Zhang & Jian Du, 2020. "Simultaneous Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks Considering Steam Supply and Various Steam Heater Locations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Molyneaux, A. & Leyland, G. & Favrat, D., 2010. "Environomic multi-objective optimisation of a district heating network considering centralized and decentralized heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 751-758.
    3. Stijepovic, Mirko Z. & Linke, Patrick, 2011. "Optimal waste heat recovery and reuse in industrial zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4019-4031.
    4. Jing, Rui & Wang, Meng & Zhang, Zhihui & Wang, Xiaonan & Li, Ning & Shah, Nilay & Zhao, Yingru, 2019. "Distributed or centralized? Designing district-level urban energy systems by a hierarchical approach considering demand uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Wang, Yufei & Chang, Chenglin & Feng, Xiao, 2015. "A systematic framework for multi-plants Heat Integration combining Direct and Indirect Heat Integration methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 56-67.
    6. Ma, Jiaze & Chang, Chenglin & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of multi-period interplant heat integration using steam system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 950-960.
    7. Huang, Xiaojian & Lu, Pei & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Liang, Yingzong & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying, 2020. "Synthesis and simultaneous MINLP optimization of heat exchanger network, steam Rankine cycle, and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingyun Yan & Lingyu Wang & Mingzhu Fang & Jie Hu, 2022. "How Can Industrial Parks Achieve Carbon Neutrality? Literature Review and Research Prospect Based on the CiteSpace Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zhaoyan & Jiang, Ping & Liu, Zhibin & Fu, Lei & Wang, Peiguang, 2023. "Capacity optimal configuration and collaborative planning of multi-region integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    2. López-Flores, Francisco Javier & Hernández-Pérez, Luis Germán & Lira-Barragán, Luis Fernando & Rubio-Castro, Eusiel & Ponce-Ortega, José M., 2022. "Optimal Profit Distribution in Interplant Waste Heat Integration through a Hybrid Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Song, Runrun & Chang, Chenglin & Tang, Qikui & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M., 2017. "The implementation of inter-plant heat integration among multiple plants. Part II: The mathematical model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 382-393.
    4. Hür Bütün & Ivan Kantor & François Maréchal, 2019. "Incorporating Location Aspects in Process Integration Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-45, August.
    5. Matthias Rathjens & Georg Fieg, 2019. "Cost-Optimal Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis Based on a Flexible Cost Functions Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Chang, Chenglin & Chen, Xiaolu & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous optimization of multi-plant heat integration using intermediate fluid circles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 306-317.
    7. Chunxia Gao & Zhaoyan Zhang & Peiguang Wang, 2023. "Day-Ahead Scheduling Strategy Optimization of Electric–Thermal Integrated Energy System to Improve the Proportion of New Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Yao Sheng & Linlin Liu & Yu Zhuang & Lei Zhang & Jian Du, 2020. "Simultaneous Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks Considering Steam Supply and Various Steam Heater Locations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Pan, Huangji & Jin, Yuhui & Li, Shaojun, 2018. "Multi-plant indirect heat integration based on the Alopex-based evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 811-821.
    10. Zhang, Bing J. & Tang, Qiao Q. & Zhao, Yue & Chen, Yu Q. & Chen, Qing L. & Floudas, Christodoulos A., 2018. "Multi-level energy integration between units, plants and sites for natural gas industrial parks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Chang, Chenglin & Wang, Yufei & Ma, Jiaze & Chen, Xiaolu & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "An energy hub approach for direct interplant heat integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 878-890.
    12. Elin Svensson & Matteo Morandin & Simon Harvey & Stavros Papadokonstantakis, 2020. "Studying the Role of System Aggregation in Energy Targeting: A Case Study of a Swedish Oil Refinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Aunedi, Marko & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco & Kuriyan, Kamal & Strbac, Goran & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Wang, Zhengchao & Perera, A.T.D., 2020. "Integrated platform to design robust energy internet," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    15. Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Fodor, Zsófia & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2012. "Total Site targeting with process specific minimum temperature difference (ΔTmin)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 20-28.
    16. Meng, Fankai & Chen, Lingen & Feng, Yuanli & Xiong, Bing, 2017. "Thermoelectric generator for industrial gas phase waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 83-90.
    17. Liang, Zheng & Liang, Yingzong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying, 2022. "Superstructure-based mixed-integer nonlinear programming framework for hybrid heat sources driven organic Rankine cycle optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    18. Bracco, Stefano & Delfino, Federico & Pampararo, Fabio & Robba, Michela & Rossi, Mansueto, 2013. "The University of Genoa smart polygeneration microgrid test-bed facility: The overall system, the technologies and the research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 442-459.
    19. Xingyun Yan & Lingyu Wang & Mingzhu Fang & Jie Hu, 2022. "How Can Industrial Parks Achieve Carbon Neutrality? Literature Review and Research Prospect Based on the CiteSpace Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Zhang, Chuan & Zhou, Li & Chhabra, Pulkit & Garud, Sushant S. & Aditya, Kevin & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Comodi, Gabriele & Dal Magro, Fabio & Meneghetti, Antonella & Kraft, Markus, 2016. "A novel methodology for the design of waste heat recovery network in eco-industrial park using techno-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 88-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:318:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922005724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.