IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v282y2021ipas0306261920315725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid transfer learning scheme for remaining useful life prediction and cycle life test optimization of different formulation Li-ion power batteries

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Jian
  • Shang, Pengchao
  • Zou, Xinyu
  • Ma, Ning
  • Ding, Yu
  • Sun, Jinwen
  • Cheng, Yujie
  • Tao, Laifa
  • Lu, Chen
  • Su, Yuzhuan
  • Chong, Jin
  • Jin, Haizu
  • Lin, Yongshou

Abstract

Long-term cycle life test in battery development is crucial for formulations selection but time-consuming and high-cost. To shorten cycle test with estimated lifespan, a prediction-based test optimization method is proposed for Li-ion batteries with different formulations. A hybrid transfer-learning method optimally selects historical test data and trained prediction model of other formulations to help construct models of the target batteries. It can improve prediction accuracy despite short-term test data containing insufficient global degradation information. Firstly, a four-step transferability measurement method automatically selects the most transferable sample from a historical database of other formulations, although their degradation laws exist individual differences and inconsistency. Four-types of transferability evaluation criteria including curve shape, long-term degradation rate, lifespan concentration, and distance between curves, are sequentially integrated to fit capacity curves characteristics and long-term prediction. Then, a prediction model using Long Short-time Memory Network is quickly initialized by transferring a shared part of the previous model of other formulations instead of random initialization. The shared model parameters are optimally and selectively transferred according to test temperature and test data amount for improving modeling effectiveness. The rest-part of the model is trained by the selected transferable-sample to learn degradation trend similar to the target battery for accurate prediction. Finally, actual data from a battery company verify the performance of the proposed method in terms of prediction and cost-saving. It achieves 89.18% average accuracy and 0.7 to 5.5 months saving under the condition of different formulations and test-stop threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Jian & Shang, Pengchao & Zou, Xinyu & Ma, Ning & Ding, Yu & Sun, Jinwen & Cheng, Yujie & Tao, Laifa & Lu, Chen & Su, Yuzhuan & Chong, Jin & Jin, Haizu & Lin, Yongshou, 2021. "A hybrid transfer learning scheme for remaining useful life prediction and cycle life test optimization of different formulation Li-ion power batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:282:y:2021:i:pa:s0306261920315725
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920315725
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cadini, F. & Sbarufatti, C. & Cancelliere, F. & Giglio, M., 2019. "State-of-life prognosis and diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries by data-driven particle filters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 661-672.
    2. Shrivastava, Prashant & Soon, Tey Kok & Idris, Mohd Yamani Idna Bin & Mekhilef, Saad, 2019. "Overview of model-based online state-of-charge estimation using Kalman filter family for lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Gallego-Castillo, Cristobal & Bessa, Ricardo & Cavalcante, Laura & Lopez-Garcia, Oscar, 2016. "On-line quantile regression in the RKHS (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space) for operational probabilistic forecasting of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 355-365.
    4. Richard Schmuch & Ralf Wagner & Gerhard Hörpel & Tobias Placke & Martin Winter, 2018. "Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 267-278, April.
    5. Omar, Noshin & Monem, Mohamed Abdel & Firouz, Yousef & Salminen, Justin & Smekens, Jelle & Hegazy, Omar & Gaulous, Hamid & Mulder, Grietus & Van den Bossche, Peter & Coosemans, Thierry & Van Mierlo, J, 2014. "Lithium iron phosphate based battery – Assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1575-1585.
    6. Hannan, M.A. & Lipu, M.S.H. & Hussain, A. & Mohamed, A., 2017. "A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 834-854.
    7. Zheng, Yuejiu & Wang, Jingjing & Qin, Chao & Lu, Languang & Han, Xuebing & Ouyang, Minggao, 2019. "A novel capacity estimation method based on charging curve sections for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 361-371.
    8. Chang, Yang & Fang, Huajing & Zhang, Yong, 2017. "A new hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of a lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1564-1578.
    9. Zhang, Caiping & Wang, Yubin & Gao, Yang & Wang, Fang & Mu, Biqiang & Zhang, Weige, 2019. "Accelerated fading recognition for lithium-ion batteries with Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese cathode using quantile regression method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Zheng, Yuejiu & Qin, Chao & Lai, Xin & Han, Xuebing & Xie, Yi, 2019. "A novel capacity estimation method for lithium-ion batteries using fusion estimation of charging curve sections and discrete Arrhenius aging model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Hu, Qinghua & Zhang, Rujia & Zhou, Yucan, 2016. "Transfer learning for short-term wind speed prediction with deep neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 83-95.
    12. Patil, Meru A. & Tagade, Piyush & Hariharan, Krishnan S. & Kolake, Subramanya M. & Song, Taewon & Yeo, Taejung & Doo, Seokgwang, 2015. "A novel multistage Support Vector Machine based approach for Li ion battery remaining useful life estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 285-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xiaowu & Liu, Zhen, 2022. "A long short-term memory neural network based Wiener process model for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. J. N. Chandra Sekhar & Bullarao Domathoti & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, 2023. "Prediction of Battery Remaining Useful Life Using Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Wang, Shunli & Fan, Yongcun & Jin, Siyu & Takyi-Aninakwa, Paul & Fernandez, Carlos, 2023. "Improved anti-noise adaptive long short-term memory neural network modeling for the robust remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Zhou, Yifei & Wang, Shunli & Xie, Yanxing & Zeng, Jiawei & Fernandez, Carlos, 2024. "Remaining useful life prediction and state of health diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries with multiscale health features based on optimized CatBoost algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    5. Zhan, Xianwen & Han, Song & Rong, Na & Cao, Yun, 2023. "A hybrid transfer learning method for transient stability prediction considering sample imbalance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    6. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Wang, Fujin & Zhao, Zhibin & Zhai, Zhi & Guo, Yanjie & Xi, Huan & Wang, Shibin & Chen, Xuefeng, 2023. "Feature disentanglement and tendency retainment with domain adaptation for Lithium-ion battery capacity estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Chen, Jianguo & Han, Xuebing & Sun, Tao & Zheng, Yuejiu, 2024. "Analysis and prediction of battery aging modes based on transfer learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Joonki & Lee, Dongheon & Jeong, Eui-Rim & Yi, Yung, 2020. "Towards the swift prediction of the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries with end-to-end deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Ma, Jian & Xu, Shu & Shang, Pengchao & ding, Yu & Qin, Weili & Cheng, Yujie & Lu, Chen & Su, Yuzhuan & Chong, Jin & Jin, Haizu & Lin, Yongshou, 2020. "Cycle life test optimization for different Li-ion power battery formulations using a hybrid remaining-useful-life prediction method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Rauf, Huzaifa & Khalid, Muhammad & Arshad, Naveed, 2022. "Machine learning in state of health and remaining useful life estimation: Theoretical and technological development in battery degradation modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Ma, Guijun & Zhang, Yong & Cheng, Cheng & Zhou, Beitong & Hu, Pengchao & Yuan, Ye, 2019. "Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on false nearest neighbors and a hybrid neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ni, Yulong & Xu, Jianing & Zhu, Chunbo & Pei, Lei, 2022. "Accurate residual capacity estimation of retired LiFePO4 batteries based on mechanism and data-driven model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    6. Wang, Cong & Chen, Yunxia, 2024. "Unsupervised dynamic prognostics for abnormal degradation of lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    7. Su, Xiaojia & Sun, Bingxiang & Wang, Jiaju & Zhang, Weige & Ma, Shichang & He, Xitian & Ruan, Haijun, 2022. "Fast capacity estimation for lithium-ion battery based on online identification of low-frequency electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Gaussian process regression," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Dai, Haifeng & Jiang, Bo & Hu, Xiaosong & Lin, Xianke & Wei, Xuezhe & Pecht, Michael, 2021. "Advanced battery management strategies for a sustainable energy future: Multilayer design concepts and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Chen, Dan & Meng, Jinhao & Huang, Huanyang & Wu, Ji & Liu, Ping & Lu, Jiwu & Liu, Tianqi, 2022. "An Empirical-Data Hybrid Driven Approach for Remaining Useful Life prediction of lithium-ion batteries considering capacity diving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    10. Lin Zou & Baoyi Wen & Yiying Wei & Yong Zhang & Jie Yang & Hui Zhang, 2022. "Online Prediction of Remaining Useful Life for Li-Ion Batteries Based on Discharge Voltage Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Chen, Zheng & Zhao, Hongqian & Shu, Xing & Zhang, Yuanjian & Shen, Jiangwei & Liu, Yonggang, 2021. "Synthetic state of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on long short-term memory network modeling and adaptive H-Infinity filter," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Yong Tian & Qianyuan Dong & Jindong Tian & Xiaoyu Li, 2023. "Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Multiple Small Voltage Sections and BP Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Zhao, Bo & Zhang, Weige & Zhang, Yanru & Zhang, Caiping & Zhang, Chi & Zhang, Junwei, 2024. "Research on the remaining useful life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries by fusion of feature engineering and deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    15. Tian, Yong & Dong, Qianyuan & Tian, Jindong & Li, Xiaoyu & Li, Guang & Mehran, Kamyar, 2023. "Capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on optimized charging voltage section and virtual sample generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    16. Jinhyeong Park & Munsu Lee & Gunwoo Kim & Seongyun Park & Jonghoon Kim, 2020. "Integrated Approach Based on Dual Extended Kalman Filter and Multivariate Autoregressive Model for Predicting Battery Capacity Using Health Indicator and SOC/SOH," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Sun, Li & Li, Guanru & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Combined internal resistance and state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery based on extended state observer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Yang, Yixin, 2021. "A machine-learning prediction method of lithium-ion battery life based on charge process for different applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    19. Meng, Jinhao & Cai, Lei & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan & Ma, Junpeng & Luo, Guangzhao & Teodorescu, Remus, 2020. "An optimized ensemble learning framework for lithium-ion Battery State of Health estimation in energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Wen, Jianping & Zhao, Dan & Zhang, Chuanwei, 2020. "An overview of electricity powered vehicles: Lithium-ion battery energy storage density and energy conversion efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1629-1648.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:282:y:2021:i:pa:s0306261920315725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.