IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v253y2019ic72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on false nearest neighbors and a hybrid neural network

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Guijun
  • Zhang, Yong
  • Cheng, Cheng
  • Zhou, Beitong
  • Hu, Pengchao
  • Yuan, Ye

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries is critically important for electronic devices. In the existing literature, the widely applied model-based approaches for remaining useful battery life estimation are limited by the complexity of the electrochemical modeling required. In addition, data-driven approaches for remaining useful battery life estimation commonly define unreliable sliding window sizes empirically and the prediction accuracy of these approaches needs to be improved. To address the above issues, use of a hybrid neural network with the false nearest neighbors method is proposed in this paper. First, the false nearest neighbors method is used to calculate the sliding window size required for prediction. Second, a hybrid neural network that combines the advantages of a convolutional neural network with those of long short-term memory is designed for model training and prediction. Remaining useful life prediction experiments for batteries with various rated capacities are performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach, and the results demonstrate that the proposed approach offers wide generality and reduced errors when compared with the other state-of-the-art methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Guijun & Zhang, Yong & Cheng, Cheng & Zhou, Beitong & Hu, Pengchao & Yuan, Ye, 2019. "Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on false nearest neighbors and a hybrid neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919313005
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoqiong Pang & Rui Huang & Jie Wen & Yuanhao Shi & Jianfang Jia & Jianchao Zeng, 2019. "A Lithium-ion Battery RUL Prediction Method Considering the Capacity Regeneration Phenomenon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Zubi, Ghassan & Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Carvalho, Monica & Pasaoglu, Guzay, 2018. "The lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 292-308.
    3. Zheng, Xiujuan & Fang, Huajing, 2015. "An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 74-82.
    4. Taichun Qin & Shengkui Zeng & Jianbin Guo & Zakwan Skaf, 2016. "A Rest Time-Based Prognostic Framework for State of Health Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries with Regeneration Phenomena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Hu, Yang & Baraldi, Piero & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2015. "A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-31.
    6. Patil, Meru A. & Tagade, Piyush & Hariharan, Krishnan S. & Kolake, Subramanya M. & Song, Taewon & Yeo, Taejung & Doo, Seokgwang, 2015. "A novel multistage Support Vector Machine based approach for Li ion battery remaining useful life estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 285-297.
    7. Shengjin Tang & Chuanqiang Yu & Xue Wang & Xiaosong Guo & Xiaosheng Si, 2014. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-28, January.
    8. Datong Liu & Hong Wang & Yu Peng & Wei Xie & Haitao Liao, 2013. "Satellite Lithium-Ion Battery Remaining Cycle Life Prediction with Novel Indirect Health Indicator Extraction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Cadini, F. & Sbarufatti, C. & Cancelliere, F. & Giglio, M., 2019. "State-of-life prognosis and diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries by data-driven particle filters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 661-672.
    10. Chang, Yang & Fang, Huajing & Zhang, Yong, 2017. "A new hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of a lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1564-1578.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rauf, Huzaifa & Khalid, Muhammad & Arshad, Naveed, 2022. "Machine learning in state of health and remaining useful life estimation: Theoretical and technological development in battery degradation modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Xiaodong Xu & Chuanqiang Yu & Shengjin Tang & Xiaoyan Sun & Xiaosheng Si & Lifeng Wu, 2019. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Wiener Processes with Considering the Relaxation Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Hong, Joonki & Lee, Dongheon & Jeong, Eui-Rim & Yi, Yung, 2020. "Towards the swift prediction of the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries with end-to-end deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    4. Ma, Qiuhui & Zheng, Ying & Yang, Weidong & Zhang, Yong & Zhang, Hong, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction of lithium battery based on capacity regeneration point detection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Lin Zou & Baoyi Wen & Yiying Wei & Yong Zhang & Jie Yang & Hui Zhang, 2022. "Online Prediction of Remaining Useful Life for Li-Ion Batteries Based on Discharge Voltage Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Zhao, Bo & Zhang, Weige & Zhang, Yanru & Zhang, Caiping & Zhang, Chi & Zhang, Junwei, 2024. "Research on the remaining useful life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries by fusion of feature engineering and deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    7. Yang, Yixin, 2021. "A machine-learning prediction method of lithium-ion battery life based on charge process for different applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Chen, Dinghong & Zhang, Weige & Zhang, Caiping & Sun, Bingxiang & Cong, XinWei & Wei, Shaoyuan & Jiang, Jiuchun, 2022. "A novel deep learning-based life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries with strong generalization capability under multiple cycle profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    9. Wu, Ji & Zhang, Chenbin & Chen, Zonghai, 2016. "An online method for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life estimation using importance sampling and neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 134-140.
    10. Dai, Haifeng & Jiang, Bo & Hu, Xiaosong & Lin, Xianke & Wei, Xuezhe & Pecht, Michael, 2021. "Advanced battery management strategies for a sustainable energy future: Multilayer design concepts and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Pang, Hui & Chen, Kaiqiang & Geng, Yuanfei & Wu, Longxing & Wang, Fengbin & Liu, Jiahao, 2024. "Accurate capacity and remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on improved particle swarm optimization and particle filter," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    12. Jingxi Yang & Matthew Beatty & Dani Strickland & Mina Abedi-Varnosfaderani & Joe Warren, 2023. "Second-Life Battery Capacity Estimation and Method Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Mingsan Ouyang & Peicheng Shen, 2022. "Prediction of Remaining Useful Life of Lithium Batteries Based on WOA-VMD and LSTM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Taichun Qin & Shengkui Zeng & Jianbin Guo & Zakwan Skaf, 2016. "A Rest Time-Based Prognostic Framework for State of Health Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries with Regeneration Phenomena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Ding, Pan & Liu, Xiaojuan & Li, Huiqin & Huang, Zequan & Zhang, Ke & Shao, Long & Abedinia, Oveis, 2021. "Useful life prediction based on wavelet packet decomposition and two-dimensional convolutional neural network for lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Ma, Jian & Shang, Pengchao & Zou, Xinyu & Ma, Ning & Ding, Yu & Sun, Jinwen & Cheng, Yujie & Tao, Laifa & Lu, Chen & Su, Yuzhuan & Chong, Jin & Jin, Haizu & Lin, Yongshou, 2021. "A hybrid transfer learning scheme for remaining useful life prediction and cycle life test optimization of different formulation Li-ion power batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    17. Chang, Yang & Fang, Huajing & Zhang, Yong, 2017. "A new hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of a lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1564-1578.
    18. Thelen, Adam & Li, Meng & Hu, Chao & Bekyarova, Elena & Kalinin, Sergey & Sanghadasa, Mohan, 2022. "Augmented model-based framework for battery remaining useful life prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    19. Cadini, F. & Sbarufatti, C. & Cancelliere, F. & Giglio, M., 2019. "State-of-life prognosis and diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries by data-driven particle filters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 661-672.
    20. Yu, Jianbo, 2018. "State of health prediction of lithium-ion batteries: Multiscale logic regression and Gaussian process regression ensemble," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 82-95.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.