IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v269y2020ics0306261920306528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility analysis of utilising underground hydrogen storage facilities in integrated energy system: Case studies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qiu, Yue
  • Zhou, Suyang
  • Wang, Jihua
  • Chou, Jun
  • Fang, Yunhui
  • Pan, Guangsheng
  • Gu, Wei

Abstract

Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) is regarded as a promising approach to achieve seasonal energy storage in the future, due to its synergy with surplus renewable energy generation. This paper proposes the idea of implementing an Integrated Energy System (IES) with UHS and other hydrogen related technologies, called Hydrogen Penetrated Energy System (HPES), and presents an intelligent planning procedure applicable to the HPES. Depleted oil/gas fields and salt caverns are selected as the study objects to explore the ability of UHS to achieve seasonal peak shaving, facilitate the renewable energy, and improve the energy system efficiency. Firstly, three regions in China are analysed in terms of geological conditions, resource endowment and load characteristics, to illustrate the feasibility of building a HPES in each of the analysed region. A two-stage planning method for the HPES is proposed and a detailed UHS model is established where the process of cushion gas accumulation is emulated and the influence of the diurnal temperature range is considered. Comprehensive case studies are subsequently carried out for typical cities or regions in Eastern, Northern and North-eastern China and the results demonstrate that the HPES can lower the cost, improve the energy efficiency and reduce the level of carbon dioxide emission to some extent. A lateral comparison also shows that the combination of salt cavern UHS and offshore wind power has a broad application prospect in the east coast of China, and the investment in the HPES scheme for Jintan can be recovered within 8 to 9 years. In addition, compared with the benchmark scheme without UHS and large penetration of renewables, the HPES scheme for Jintan can improve the primary energy efficiency by 22.26% and 27.75% in the first decade and second decade, reduce the carbon dioxide emission by more than 96%, and consume an average level of 95.85% of the offshore wind power. Although the investment payback period of HPES cases in north and northwest China is relatively long (20 years or more), significant return and benefits can be obtained in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiu, Yue & Zhou, Suyang & Wang, Jihua & Chou, Jun & Fang, Yunhui & Pan, Guangsheng & Gu, Wei, 2020. "Feasibility analysis of utilising underground hydrogen storage facilities in integrated energy system: Case studies in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:269:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920306528
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920306528
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Santoli, Livio & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Bruschi, Daniele, 2013. "Energy characterization of CHP (combined heat and power) fuelled with hydrogen enriched natural gas blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 13-22.
    2. Hevia-Koch, Pablo & Klinge Jacobsen, Henrik, 2019. "Comparing offshore and onshore wind development considering acceptance costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 9-19.
    3. Sliz-Szkliniarz, B. & Eberbach, J. & Hoffmann, B. & Fortin, M., 2019. "Assessing the cost of onshore wind development scenarios: Modelling of spatial and temporal distribution of wind power for the case of Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 514-531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Chong & Lin, Junjie & Zeng, Jianfeng & Han, Fengwu, 2022. "Wind-photovoltaic co-generation prediction and energy scheduling of low-carbon complex regional integrated energy system with hydrogen industry chain based on copula-MILP," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    2. Wu, Yunna & Liu, Fangtong & Wu, Junhao & He, Jiaming & Xu, Minjia & Zhou, Jianli, 2022. "Barrier identification and analysis framework to the development of offshore wind-to-hydrogen projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    3. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Zakeri, Behnam & Barbosa, Paulo Sérgio Franco, 2022. "Hydrogen Deep Ocean Link: a global sustainable interconnected energy grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Lankof, Leszek & Urbańczyk, Kazimierz & Tarkowski, Radosław, 2022. "Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Liu, Zhijian & Fan, Guangyao & Sun, Dekang & Wu, Di & Guo, Jiacheng & Zhang, Shicong & Yang, Xinyan & Lin, Xianping & Ai, Lei, 2022. "A novel distributed energy system combining hybrid energy storage and a multi-objective optimization method for nearly zero-energy communities and buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    6. Tarkowski, R. & Uliasz-Misiak, B., 2022. "Towards underground hydrogen storage: A review of barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage Potential in Natural Gas Deposits in the Polish Lowlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Yin, Linfei & Zhang, Bin, 2023. "Relaxed deep generative adversarial networks for real-time economic smart generation dispatch and control of integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    9. Du, Zhengyang & Dai, Zhenxue & Yang, Zhijie & Zhan, Chuanjun & Chen, Wei & Cao, Mingxu & Thanh, Hung Vo & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza, 2024. "Exploring hydrogen geologic storage in China for future energy: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Rui Cai & Hongling Ma & Xiaopeng Liang & Kai Zhao & Chunhe Yang, 2024. "Allowable Pillar Width for Salt Cavern Gas Storage Based on Triangular Well Layout: A Case Study in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Gao, Jianwei & Meng, Qichen & Liu, Jiangtao & Wang, Ziying, 2024. "Thermoelectric optimization of integrated energy system considering wind-photovoltaic uncertainty, two-stage power-to-gas and ladder-type carbon trading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Xiang, Yue & Cai, Hanhu & Liu, Junyong & Zhang, Xin, 2021. "Techno-economic design of energy systems for airport electrification: A hydrogen-solar-storage integrated microgrid solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Leszek Lankof & Stanisław Nagy & Krzysztof Polański & Kazimierz Urbańczyk, 2022. "Potential for Underground Storage of Liquid Fuels in Bedded Rock Salt Formations in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Jahanbani Veshareh, Moein & Thaysen, Eike Marie & Nick, Hamidreza M., 2022. "Feasibility of hydrogen storage in depleted hydrocarbon chalk reservoirs: Assessment of biochemical and chemical effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    16. Fan, Guangyao & Liu, Zhijian & Liu, Xuan & Shi, Yaxin & Wu, Di & Guo, Jiacheng & Zhang, Shicong & Yang, Xinyan & Zhang, Yulong, 2022. "Two-layer collaborative optimization for a renewable energy system combining electricity storage, hydrogen storage, and heat storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Lu, Qing & Guo, Qisheng & Zeng, Wei, 2022. "Optimization scheduling of integrated energy service system in community: A bi-layer optimization model considering multi-energy demand response and user satisfaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    18. Tarkowski, Radosław & Lankof, Leszek & Luboń, Katarzyna & Michalski, Jan, 2024. "Hydrogen storage capacity of salt caverns and deep aquifers versus demand for hydrogen storage: A case study of Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    19. Wang, Yuwei & Song, Minghao & Jia, Mengyao & Li, Bingkang & Fei, Haoran & Zhang, Yiyue & Wang, Xuejie, 2023. "Multi-objective distributionally robust optimization for hydrogen-involved total renewable energy CCHP planning under source-load uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    20. Dariusz Knez & Omid Ahmad Mahmoudi Zamani, 2023. "Up-to-Date Status of Geoscience in the Field of Natural Hydrogen with Consideration of Petroleum Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehmann, Paul & Reutter, Felix & Tafarte, Philip, 2023. "Optimal siting of onshore wind turbines: Local disamenities matter," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Lehmann, Paul & Reutter, Felix & Tafarte, Philip, 2021. "Optimal siting of onshore wind turbines: Local disamenities matter," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2021, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    3. Zilong, Ti & Xiao Wei, Deng, 2022. "Layout optimization of offshore wind farm considering spatially inhomogeneous wave loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    4. Dawid Augustyn & Martin D. Ulriksen & John D. Sørensen, 2021. "Reliability Updating of Offshore Wind Substructures by Use of Digital Twin Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. de Santoli, Livio & Paiolo, Romano & Lo Basso, Gianluigi, 2020. "Energy-environmental experimental campaign on a commercial CHP fueled with H2NG blends and oxygen enriched air hailing from on-site electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    6. Lehmann, Paul & Tafarte, Philip, 2024. "Exclusion zones for renewable energy deployment: One man’s blessing, another man’s curse," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Kamila Pronińska & Krzysztof Księżopolski, 2021. "Baltic Offshore Wind Energy Development—Poland’s Public Policy Tools Analysis and the Geostrategic Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Kouchachvili, Lia & Entchev, Evgueniy, 2018. "Power to gas and H2/NG blend in SMART energy networks concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-464.
    9. Nastasi, Benedetto & Lo Basso, Gianluigi, 2016. "Hydrogen to link heat and electricity in the transition towards future Smart Energy Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 5-22.
    10. Elia, A. & Taylor, M. & Ó Gallachóir, B. & Rogan, F., 2020. "Wind turbine cost reduction: A detailed bottom-up analysis of innovation drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Elisa Pennacchia & Mariagrazia Tiberi & Elisa Carbonara & Davide Astiaso Garcia & Fabrizio Cumo, 2016. "Reuse and Upcycling of Municipal Waste for ZEB Envelope Design in European Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Gao, Dan & Jiang, Dongfang & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng & Hu, Sangao & Xu, Hong, 2014. "An integrated energy storage system based on hydrogen storage: Process configuration and case studies with wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 332-341.
    13. Marcin Pluta & Artur Wyrwa & Wojciech Suwała & Janusz Zyśk & Maciej Raczyński & Stanisław Tokarski, 2020. "A Generalized Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch Approach for Analysing the Polish Power System under High Renewable Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Peri, Erez & Tal, Alon, 2021. "Is setback distance the best criteria for siting wind turbines under crowded conditions? An empirical analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Donk, Peter & Sterl, Sebastian & Thiery, Wim & Willems, Patrick, 2021. "REVUB-Light: A parsimonious model to assess power system balancing and flexibility for optimal intermittent renewable energy integration – A study of Suriname," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 57-75.
    16. Maassen Maria Alexandra, 2023. "Project Management in the Wind Energy Field. Case Study: Evaluation of Wind Energy Projects through the Net Present Value," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 80-88, July.
    17. José Baptista & Beatriz Jesus & Adelaide Cerveira & Eduardo J. Solteiro Pires, 2023. "Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimisation Considering Wake Effect and Power Losses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Justyna Zalewska & Krzysztof Damaziak & Jerzy Malachowski, 2021. "An Energy Efficiency Estimation Procedure for Small Wind Turbines at Chosen Locations in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir & Margrét Wendt & Edita Tverijonaite, 2021. "Wealth of Wind and Visitors: Tourist Industry Attitudes towards Wind Energy Development in Iceland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Ladenburg, Jacob & Hevia-Koch, Pablo & Petrović, Stefan & Knapp, Lauren, 2020. "The offshore-onshore conundrum: Preferences for wind energy considering spatial data in Denmark," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:269:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920306528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.