IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p9893-d1176224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimisation Considering Wake Effect and Power Losses

Author

Listed:
  • José Baptista

    (Department of Engineering, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    INESC-TEC UTAD Pole, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Beatriz Jesus

    (Department of Engineering, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Adelaide Cerveira

    (INESC-TEC UTAD Pole, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Department of Mathematics, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Eduardo J. Solteiro Pires

    (Department of Engineering, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    INESC-TEC UTAD Pole, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed a new paradigm in terms of electrical energy production. The production of electricity from renewable sources has come to play a leading role, thus allowing us not only to face the global increase in energy consumption, but also to achieve the objectives of decarbonising the economies of several countries. In this scenario, where onshore wind energy is practically exhausted, several countries are betting on constructing offshore wind farms. Since all the costs involved are higher when compared to onshore, optimising the efficiency of this type of infrastructure as much as possible is essential. The main aim of this paper was to develop an optimisation model to find the best wind turbine locations for offshore wind farms and to obtain the wind farm layout to maximise the profit, avoiding cable crossings, taking into account the wake effect and power losses. The ideal positioning of wind turbines is important for maximising the production of electrical energy. Furthermore, a techno-economic analysis was performed to calculate the main economic indicators, namely the net present value, the internal rate of return, and the payback period, to support the decision-making. The results showed that the developed model found the best solution that maximised the profits of the wind farm during its lifetime. It also showed that the location of the offshore substation played a key role in achieving these goals.

Suggested Citation

  • José Baptista & Beatriz Jesus & Adelaide Cerveira & Eduardo J. Solteiro Pires, 2023. "Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimisation Considering Wake Effect and Power Losses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9893-:d:1176224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tvinnereim, Endre & Mehling, Michael, 2018. "Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 185-189.
    2. Adelaide Cerveira & Eduardo J. Solteiro Pires & José Baptista, 2021. "Wind Farm Cable Connection Layout Optimization with Several Substations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Hevia-Koch, Pablo & Klinge Jacobsen, Henrik, 2019. "Comparing offshore and onshore wind development considering acceptance costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 9-19.
    4. Fischetti, Martina & Pisinger, David, 2018. "Optimizing wind farm cable routing considering power losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 917-930.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnus Daniel Kallinger & José Ignacio Rapha & Pau Trubat Casal & José Luis Domínguez-García, 2023. "Offshore Electrical Grid Layout Optimization for Floating Wind—A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-37, June.
    2. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Finon, Dominique, 2019. "Carbon policy in developing countries: Giving priority to non-price instruments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 38-43.
    4. Tan, Xiujie & Sun, Qian & Wang, Meiji & Se Cheong, Tsun & Yan Shum, Wai & Huang, Jinpeng, 2022. "Assessing the effects of emissions trading systems on energy consumption and energy mix," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2022. "Energy transition in the UKCS – Modelling the effects of carbon emission charges on upstream petroleum operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Donato Masciandaro & Riccardo Russo, 2022. "Central Banks and Climate Policy: Unpleasant Trade–Offs? A Principal–Agent Approach," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 22181, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    7. Easwaran Narassimhan & Stefan Koester & Kelly Sims Gallagher, 2022. "Carbon Pricing in the US: Examining State-Level Policy Support and Federal Resistance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 275-289.
    8. Siyu Tao & Andrés Feijóo & Jiemin Zhou & Gang Zheng, 2020. "Topology Design of an Offshore Wind Farm with Multiple Types of Wind Turbines in a Circular Layout," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Zilong, Ti & Xiao Wei, Deng, 2022. "Layout optimization of offshore wind farm considering spatially inhomogeneous wave loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    10. Fan, Ailong & Wang, Junteng & He, Yapeng & Perčić, Maja & Vladimir, Nikola & Yang, Liu, 2021. "Decarbonising inland ship power system: Alternative solution and assessment method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    11. Cazzaro, Davide & Fischetti, Martina & Fischetti, Matteo, 2020. "Heuristic algorithms for the Wind Farm Cable Routing problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Umar, Bamanga & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Al-Amin, Abul Quasem, 2021. "Exploring the Contribution of Energy Price to Carbon Emissions in African Countries," OSF Preprints ru4jz, Center for Open Science.
    13. Chen, Zhenling & Yuan, Xiao-Chen & Zhang, Xiaoling & Cao, Yunfei, 2020. "How will the Chinese national carbon emissions trading scheme work? The assessment of regional potential gains," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Dibaj, Ali & Gao, Zhen & Nejad, Amir R., 2023. "Fault detection of offshore wind turbine drivetrains in different environmental conditions through optimal selection of vibration measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 161-176.
    15. Qiu, Yue & Zhou, Suyang & Wang, Jihua & Chou, Jun & Fang, Yunhui & Pan, Guangsheng & Gu, Wei, 2020. "Feasibility analysis of utilising underground hydrogen storage facilities in integrated energy system: Case studies in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. Yuanhang Qi & Peng Hou & Guisong Liu & Rongsen Jin & Zhile Yang & Guangya Yang & Zhaoyang Dong, 2021. "Cable Connection Optimization for Heterogeneous Offshore Wind Farms via a Voronoi Diagram Based Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with Local Search," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Vallès Codina, Oriol, 2023. "Business cycles, sectoral price stabilization, and climate change mitigation: A model of multi-sector growth in the tradition of the Bielefeld disequilibrium approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 636-653.
    18. Geissler, Caleb H. & Maravelias, Christos T., 2021. "Economic, energetic, and environmental analysis of lignocellulosic biorefineries with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    19. Maja Perčić & Nikola Vladimir & Marija Koričan, 2021. "Electrification of Inland Waterway Ships Considering Power System Lifetime Emissions and Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Dawid Augustyn & Martin D. Ulriksen & John D. Sørensen, 2021. "Reliability Updating of Offshore Wind Substructures by Use of Digital Twin Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9893-:d:1176224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.