IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v202y2017icp581-596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices

Author

Listed:
  • Motalleb, Mahdi
  • Ghorbani, Reza

Abstract

Our research is primarily concerned with the construction of a theoretical model of the competition between demand response aggregators for selling energy previously stored in an aggregation of storage devices (which the aggregator manages) given sufficient demand from other aggregators through an incomplete information game. The model culminates in a game-theoretically justifiable decision making procedure for the sellers which may be used to predict and analyze the bids made for energy sale in the market. The methodology for applying the model is worked out in detail for a three-aggregator case where two players compete with each other for sale to a third. Relevant numerical data for the competition is taken from a real case study which took place on the island of Maui, Hawaii. This market framework is presented as an alternative to the traditional vertically-integrated market structure, which may be better suited for developing demand response and smart grid technologies. We consider two non-cooperative game variants with different market conditions: one competition with no limitation, and one a Stackelberg competition subject to limitations on transaction price and size, each separately with and without inclusion of demand response scheduling (we focus on significant load-bearing thermostatic storage devices such as water heaters, though the principles should be applied generally). Determining the optimal bidding strategies follow the same procedure, and the equilibrium bidding strategies of all others are determined by each player in each case and demonstrates the wide applicability of our methods in each case. Bidding strategy is dependent on parameters inherent to an aggregator’s energy storage hardware. Demand response scheduling offers greater payoff for aggregators who implement it, compared with those who do not. Addition of transaction price and power quantity regulations to the market lowers payoffs for all aggregators participating in the market relative to competition with no limitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Motalleb, Mahdi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2017. "Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 581-596.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:202:y:2017:i:c:p:581-596
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917307481
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.186?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fotouhi Ghazvini, Mohammad Ali & Canizes, Bruno & Vale, Zita & Morais, Hugo, 2013. "Stochastic short-term maintenance scheduling of GENCOs in an oligopolistic electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 667-677.
    2. Liu, Zhen & Zhang, Xiliang & Lieu, Jenny, 2010. "Design of the incentive mechanism in electricity auction market based on the signaling game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1813-1819.
    3. Lo Prete, Chiara & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 524-541.
    4. Wu, Zhou & Tazvinga, Henerica & Xia, Xiaohua, 2015. "Demand side management of photovoltaic-battery hybrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 294-304.
    5. Yu, Mengmeng & Hong, Seung Ho, 2016. "Supply–demand balancing for power management in smart grid: A Stackelberg game approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 702-710.
    6. Nanduri, Vishnu & Kazemzadeh, Narges, 2012. "Economic impact assessment and operational decision making in emission and transmission constrained electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 212-221.
    7. Wu, Tian & Ma, Lin & Mao, Zhonggen & Ou, Xunmin, 2015. "Setting up charging electric stations within residential communities in current China: Gaming of government agencies and property management companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 216-226.
    8. Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa & Moini, Alireza & Makui, Ahmad, 2012. "Operational and non-operational performance evaluation of thermal power plants in Iran: A game theory approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 96-103.
    9. Kamalinia, Saeed & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Wu, Lei, 2014. "Sustainable resource planning in energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 112-120.
    10. Lv, Tianguang & Ai, Qian, 2016. "Interactive energy management of networked microgrids-based active distribution system considering large-scale integration of renewable energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 408-422.
    11. Wang, Jianhui & Zhou, Zhi & Botterud, Audun, 2011. "An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3459-3467.
    12. Wan, Rui & Boyce, John R., 2014. "Non-renewable resource Stackelberg games," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 102-121.
    13. Tian, Ruijie & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Ge & Li, Hailong & Chen, Siyuan & Li, Yan & Tian, Yulu, 2017. "Study on the promotion of natural gas-fired electricity with energy market reform in China using a dynamic game-theoretic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1832-1839.
    14. Orlov, Anton, 2016. "Effects of higher domestic gas prices in Russia on the European gas market: A game theoretical Hotelling model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 188-199.
    15. Motalleb, Mahdi & Thornton, Matsu & Reihani, Ehsan & Ghorbani, Reza, 2016. "A nascent market for contingency reserve services using demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 985-995.
    16. Wang, Ge & Zhang, Qi & Li, Hailong & McLellan, Benjamin C. & Chen, Siyuan & Li, Yan & Tian, Yulu, 2017. "Study on the promotion impact of demand response on distributed PV penetration by using non-cooperative game theoretical analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1869-1878.
    17. Lorenczik, Stefan & Panke, Timo, 2016. "Assessing market structures in resource markets — An empirical analysis of the market for metallurgical coal using various equilibrium models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-187.
    18. Finn, P. & O’Connell, M. & Fitzpatrick, C., 2013. "Demand side management of a domestic dishwasher: Wind energy gains, financial savings and peak-time load reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 678-685.
    19. Gong, Chengzhu & Tang, Kai & Zhu, Kejun & Hailu, Atakelty, 2016. "An optimal time-of-use pricing for urban gas: A study with a multi-agent evolutionary game-theoretic perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 283-294.
    20. Nwulu, Nnamdi I. & Xia, Xiaohua, 2015. "Implementing a model predictive control strategy on the dynamic economic emission dispatch problem with game theory based demand response programs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 404-419.
    21. Reihani, Ehsan & Motalleb, Mahdi & Thornton, Matsu & Ghorbani, Reza, 2016. "A novel approach using flexible scheduling and aggregation to optimize demand response in the developing interactive grid market architecture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 445-455.
    22. Su, Wencong & Huang, Alex Q., 2014. "A game theoretic framework for a next-generation retail electricity market with high penetration of distributed residential electricity suppliers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 341-350.
    23. Moura, Pedro S. & de Almeida, Aníbal T., 2010. "The role of demand-side management in the grid integration of wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2581-2588, August.
    24. Zhang, Ni & Yan, Yu & Su, Wencong, 2015. "A game-theoretic economic operation of residential distribution system with high participation of distributed electricity prosumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 471-479.
    25. Motalleb, Mahdi & Reihani, Ehsan & Ghorbani, Reza, 2016. "Optimal placement and sizing of the storage supporting transmission and distribution networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 651-659.
    26. Lise, Wietze & Linderhof, Vincent & Kuik, Onno & Kemfert, Claudia & Ostling, Robert & Heinzow, Thomas, 2006. "A game theoretic model of the Northwestern European electricity market--market power and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 2123-2136, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fioriti, Davide & Frangioni, Antonio & Poli, Davide, 2021. "Optimal sizing of energy communities with fair revenue sharing and exit clauses: Value, role and business model of aggregators and users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    2. Li, Songrui & Zhang, Lihui & Nie, Lei & Wang, Jianing, 2022. "Trading strategy and benefit optimization of load aggregators in integrated energy systems considering integrated demand response: A hierarchical Stackelberg game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Duan, Jiandong & Liu, Fan & Yang, Yao, 2022. "Optimal operation for integrated electricity and natural gas systems considering demand response uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    4. Motalleb, Mahdi & Siano, Pierluigi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2019. "Networked Stackelberg Competition in a Demand Response Market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 680-691.
    5. Elkazaz, Mahmoud & Sumner, Mark & Thomas, David, 2021. "A hierarchical and decentralized energy management system for peer-to-peer energy trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    6. Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Zacharis, Evan, 2019. "Optimisation framework for the design and operation of open-market urban and remote community microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Debin Fang & Qiyu Ren & Qian Yu, 2018. "How Elastic Demand Affects Bidding Strategy in Electricity Market: An Auction Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Barbero, Mattia & Casals, Lluc Canals & Corchero, Cristina, 2020. "Comparison between economic and environmental drivers for demand side aggregator," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Wu, Qiong & Xie, Zhun & Ren, Hongbo & Li, Qifen & Yang, Yongwen, 2022. "Optimal trading strategies for multi-energy microgrid cluster considering demand response under different trading modes: A comparison study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. Jinseok Kim & Hyungseop Hong & Ki-Il Kim, 2018. "Adaptive Optimized Pattern Extracting Algorithm for Forecasting Maximum Electrical Load Duration Using Random Sampling and Cumulative Slope Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Zhang, Chenghua & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Cheng, Meng & Long, Chao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Bin Zhang & Li Sun & Mengyao Yang & Kin-Keung Lai & Bhagwat Ram, 2023. "A Robust Optimization Approach for Smart Energy Market Revenue Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Sobhani, Seyed Omid & Sheykhha, Siamak & Madlener, Reinhard, 2020. "An integrated two-level demand-side management game applied to smart energy hubs with storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Ke & Liu, Shuai & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Yu, 2021. "Distributed coordinative transaction of a community integrated energy system based on a tri-level game model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    15. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    16. Mei, Jie & Chen, Chen & Wang, Jianhui & Kirtley, James L., 2019. "Coalitional game theory based local power exchange algorithm for networked microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 133-141.
    17. Jeseok Ryu & Jinho Kim, 2020. "Non-Cooperative Indirect Energy Trading with Energy Storage Systems for Mitigation of Demand Response Participation Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Chen, Yang & Park, Byungkwon & Kou, Xiao & Hu, Mengqi & Dong, Jin & Li, Fangxing & Amasyali, Kadir & Olama, Mohammed, 2020. "A comparison study on trading behavior and profit distribution in local energy transaction games," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    19. Homa Rashidizadeh-Kermani & Hamid Reza Najafi & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Josep M. Guerrero, 2018. "Optimal Decision-Making Strategy of an Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Short-Term Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Li, Yang & Wang, Bin & Yang, Zhen & Li, Jiazheng & Chen, Chen, 2022. "Hierarchical stochastic scheduling of multi-community integrated energy systems in uncertain environments via Stackelberg game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    21. Lüth, Alexandra & Zepter, Jan Martin & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging, Ruud, 2018. "Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1233-1243.
    22. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    23. Yu, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Fan, Y.R. & Yin, S., 2018. "Planning regional-scale electric power systems under uncertainty: A case study of Jing-Jin-Ji region, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 834-849.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    2. Motalleb, Mahdi & Siano, Pierluigi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2019. "Networked Stackelberg Competition in a Demand Response Market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 680-691.
    3. Nurcan Yarar & Yeliz Yoldas & Serkan Bahceci & Ahmet Onen & Jaesung Jung, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review Based on the Game Theory with Energy Management and Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Hu, Maomao & Xiao, Fu & Wang, Shengwei, 2021. "Neighborhood-level coordination and negotiation techniques for managing demand-side flexibility in residential microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Früh, Wolf-Gerrit & Flynn, David, 2017. "Game-theoretic modeling of curtailment rules and network investments with distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 174-187.
    6. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    8. Fan, Songli & Ai, Qian & Piao, Longjian, 2018. "Bargaining-based cooperative energy trading for distribution company and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 469-482.
    9. Wu, Qiong & Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Ren, Jianxing, 2017. "Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 384-391.
    10. Wu, Qiong & Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Ren, Jianxing & Lao, Changshi, 2017. "Profit allocation analysis among the distributed energy network participants based on Game-theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 783-794.
    11. Aviad Navon & Gefen Ben Yosef & Ram Machlev & Shmuel Shapira & Nilanjan Roy Chowdhury & Juri Belikov & Ariel Orda & Yoash Levron, 2020. "Applications of Game Theory to Design and Operation of Modern Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-35, August.
    12. Acuña, Luceny Guzmán & Ríos, Diana Ramírez & Arboleda, Carlos Paternina & Ponzón, Esneyder González, 2018. "Cooperation model in the electricity energy market using bi-level optimization and Shapley value," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 161-168.
    13. Lu, Tianguang & Ai, Qian & Wang, Zhaoyu, 2018. "Interactive game vector: A stochastic operation-based pricing mechanism for smart energy systems with coupled-microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1462-1475.
    14. Sourav Khanna & Victor Becerra & Adib Allahham & Damian Giaouris & Jamie M. Foster & Keiron Roberts & David Hutchinson & Jim Fawcett, 2020. "Demand Response Model Development for Smart Households Using Time of Use Tariffs and Optimal Control—The Isle of Wight Energy Autonomous Community Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    15. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Bhatti, Bilal Ahmad & Broadwater, Robert, 2019. "Energy trading in the distribution system using a non-model based game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Pfeifer, Antun & Feijoo, Felipe & Duić, Neven, 2023. "Fast energy transition as a best strategy for all? The nash equilibrium of long-term energy planning strategies in coupled power markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Akhil Joseph & Patil Balachandra, 2020. "Energy Internet, the Future Electricity System: Overview, Concept, Model Structure, and Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Rajeev, T. & Ashok, S., 2015. "Dynamic load-shifting program based on a cloud computing framework to support the integration of renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 141-149.
    20. Konstantakopoulos, Ioannis C. & Barkan, Andrew R. & He, Shiying & Veeravalli, Tanya & Liu, Huihan & Spanos, Costas, 2019. "A deep learning and gamification approach to improving human-building interaction and energy efficiency in smart infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 810-821.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:202:y:2017:i:c:p:581-596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.