IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i15p3982-d393495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applications of Game Theory to Design and Operation of Modern Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review

Author

Listed:
  • Aviad Navon

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Gefen Ben Yosef

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Ram Machlev

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Shmuel Shapira

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Nilanjan Roy Chowdhury

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Juri Belikov

    (Department of Software Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Ariel Orda

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Yoash Levron

    (The Andrew and Erna Viterbi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

Abstract

In this work, we review papers that employ game theoretic tools to study the operation and design of modern electric grids. We consider four topics in this context: energy trading, energy balancing, grid planning, and system reliability, and we demonstrate the advantages of using game-theoretic approaches for analyzing complex interactions among independent players. The results and conclusions provide insights regarding many aspects of design and operation, such as efficient methodologies for expansion planning, cyber-security, and frequency stability, or fair-benefit allocation among players. A central conclusion is that modeling the system from the perspective of one entity with unlimited information and control span is often impractical, so correct modeling of the selfish behavior of independent players may be critical for the development of future power systems. Another conclusion is that correct usage of incentives by appropriate regulation or sophisticated pricing mechanisms may improve the social welfare, and, in several cases, the results obtained are as good as those obtained by central planning. Using an extensive content analysis, we point to several trends in the current research and attempt to identify the research directions that are currently at the focus of the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Aviad Navon & Gefen Ben Yosef & Ram Machlev & Shmuel Shapira & Nilanjan Roy Chowdhury & Juri Belikov & Ariel Orda & Yoash Levron, 2020. "Applications of Game Theory to Design and Operation of Modern Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-35, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3982-:d:393495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3982/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3982/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Limpens, Gauthier & Jeanmart, Hervé, 2018. "Electricity storage needs for the energy transition: An EROI based analysis illustrated by the case of Belgium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 960-973.
    2. Zhou, Qun & Tesfatsion, Leigh & Liu, Chen-Ching & Chu, Ron F. & Sun, Wei, 2013. "A Nash Approach to Planning Merchant Transmission for Renewable Resource Integration," Staff General Research Papers Archive 36496, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Srinivasan, Dipti & Rajgarhia, Sanjana & Radhakrishnan, Bharat Menon & Sharma, Anurag & Khincha, H.P., 2017. "Game-Theory based dynamic pricing strategies for demand side management in smart grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 132-143.
    4. Yu, Nanpeng & Tesfatsion, Leigh & Liu, Chen-Ching, 2012. "Financial Bilateral Contract Negotiation in Wholesale Electricity Markets Using Nash Bargaining Theory," ISU General Staff Papers 201201010800001470, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Huang, Yu Wen & Kittner, Noah & Kammen, Daniel M., 2019. "ASEAN grid flexibility: Preparedness for grid integration of renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 711-726.
    6. João Soares & Tiago Pinto & Fernando Lezama & Hugo Morais, 2018. "Survey on Complex Optimization and Simulation for the New Power Systems Paradigm," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-32, August.
    7. Zhang, Xian & Chan, K.W. & Wang, Huaizhi & Hu, Jiefeng & Zhou, Bin & Zhang, Yan & Qiu, Jing, 2019. "Game-theoretic planning for integrated energy system with independent participants considering ancillary services of power-to-gas stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 249-264.
    8. Han, Xiaojuan & Ji, Tianming & Zhao, Zekun & Zhang, Hao, 2015. "Economic evaluation of batteries planning in energy storage power stations for load shifting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 643-647.
    9. Kristiansen, Martin & Korpås, Magnus & Svendsen, Harald G., 2018. "A generic framework for power system flexibility analysis using cooperative game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 223-232.
    10. Tengfei Ma & Junyong Wu & Liangliang Hao & Huaguang Yan & Dezhi Li, 2018. "A Real-Time Pricing Scheme for Energy Management in Integrated Energy Systems: A Stackelberg Game Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Klessmann, Corinna & Held, Anne & Rathmann, Max & Ragwitz, Mario, 2011. "Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7637-7657.
    12. Nian Wang & Jing Zhang & Yu He & Min Liu & Ying Zhang & Chaokuan Chen & Yerui Gu & Yongheng Ren, 2020. "Load-Frequency Control of Multi-Area Power System Based on the Improved Weighted Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Su, Wencong & Huang, Alex Q., 2014. "A game theoretic framework for a next-generation retail electricity market with high penetration of distributed residential electricity suppliers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 341-350.
    14. Somi Jung & Dongwoo Kim, 2017. "Pareto-Efficient Capacity Planning for Residential Photovoltaic Generation and Energy Storage with Demand-Side Load Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Arnob Ghosh & Vaneet Aggarwal, 2020. "Penalty Based Control Mechanism for Strategic Prosumers in a Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Lo Prete, Chiara & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 524-541.
    17. Esteban, Miguel & Zhang, Qi & Utama, Agya, 2012. "Estimation of the energy storage requirement of a future 100% renewable energy system in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 22-31.
    18. Banez-Chicharro, Fernando & Olmos, Luis & Ramos, Andres & Latorre, Jesus M., 2017. "Beneficiaries of transmission expansion projects of an expansion plan: An Aumann-Shapley approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 382-401.
    19. Arezou Gholizad & Loza Ahmadi & Erfan Hassannayebi & Mehrdad Memarpour & Masoud Shakibayifar, 2017. "A System Dynamics Model for the Analysis of the Deregulation in Electricity Market," International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), IGI Global, vol. 6(2), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Bohao Sun & Yong Tang & Lin Ye & Chaoyu Chen & Cihang Zhang & Wuzhi Zhong, 2018. "A Frequency Control Strategy Considering Large Scale Wind Power Cluster Integration Based on Distributed Model Predictive Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    21. Fan, Songli & Ai, Qian & Piao, Longjian, 2018. "Bargaining-based cooperative energy trading for distribution company and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 469-482.
    22. Wang, Jianhui & Zhou, Zhi & Botterud, Audun, 2011. "An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3459-3467.
    23. Leach, Gerald, 1992. "The energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 116-123, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pfeifer, Antun & Feijoo, Felipe & Duić, Neven, 2023. "Fast energy transition as a best strategy for all? The nash equilibrium of long-term energy planning strategies in coupled power markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Younes Zahraoui & Tarmo Korõtko & Argo Rosin & Saad Mekhilef & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Alex Stojcevski & Ibrahim Alhamrouni, 2024. "AI Applications to Enhance Resilience in Power Systems and Microgrids—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-35, June.
    3. Yuly V. Garcia & Oscar Garzon & Carlos J. Delgado & Jan L. Diaz & Cesar A. Vega Penagos & Fabio Andrade & Adriana C. Luna & J. C. Hernandez, 2023. "Overview on Transactive Energy—Advantages and Challenges for Weak Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Marcel Clemens & Torsten Clemens, 2022. "Scenarios to Decarbonize Austria’s Energy Consumption and the Role of Underground Hydrogen Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Li, Ke & Ye, Ning & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui, 2023. "Distributed collaborative operation strategies in multi-agent integrated energy system considering integrated demand response based on game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Li, Xu & Deng, Jianhua & Liu, Jichun, 2024. "A two-layer and three-stage dynamic demand response game model considering the out of sync response for gases generators," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Nurcan Yarar & Yeliz Yoldas & Serkan Bahceci & Ahmet Onen & Jaesung Jung, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review Based on the Game Theory with Energy Management and Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Filipe Bandeiras & Álvaro Gomes & Mário Gomes & Paulo Coelho, 2023. "Application and Challenges of Coalitional Game Theory in Power Systems for Sustainable Energy Trading Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-42, December.
    9. Noppada Teera-achariyakul & Dulpichet Rerkpreedapong, 2022. "Optimal Preventive Maintenance Planning for Electric Power Distribution Systems Using Failure Rates and Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Gustavo Chica-Pedraza & Eduardo Mojica-Nava & Ernesto Cadena-Muñoz, 2021. "Boltzmann Distributed Replicator Dynamics: Population Games in a Microgrid Context," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurcan Yarar & Yeliz Yoldas & Serkan Bahceci & Ahmet Onen & Jaesung Jung, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review Based on the Game Theory with Energy Management and Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Motalleb, Mahdi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2017. "Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 581-596.
    3. Mei, Jie & Chen, Chen & Wang, Jianhui & Kirtley, James L., 2019. "Coalitional game theory based local power exchange algorithm for networked microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 133-141.
    4. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    5. Churkin, Andrey & Bialek, Janusz & Pozo, David & Sauma, Enzo & Korgin, Nikolay, 2021. "Review of Cooperative Game Theory applications in power system expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Li, Bo & Li, Xu & Su, Qingyu, 2022. "A system and game strategy for the isolated island electric-gas deeply coupled energy network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    8. Wu, Qiong & Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Ren, Jianxing, 2017. "Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 384-391.
    9. Jalali, Mohammad Majid & Kazemi, Ahad, 2015. "Demand side management in a smart grid with multiple electricity suppliers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 766-776.
    10. Wu, Qiong & Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Ren, Jianxing & Lao, Changshi, 2017. "Profit allocation analysis among the distributed energy network participants based on Game-theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 783-794.
    11. Faria, Victor. A.D. & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & Lima, Luana M.M. & Lima, José W.M., 2018. "Cooperative game theory and last addition method in the allocation of firm energy rights," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 905-915.
    12. Matsuo, Yuhji & Endo, Seiya & Nagatomi, Yu & Shibata, Yoshiaki & Komiyama, Ryoichi & Fujii, Yasumasa, 2020. "Investigating the economics of the power sector under high penetration of variable renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Jiang, Qian & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie & Cao, Yan & Wang, Zibo & Wei, Wei & Hou, Kai & Yu, Xiaodan, 2022. "A Stackelberg Game-based planning approach for integrated community energy system considering multiple participants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Kai Ma & Congshan Wang & Jie Yang & Qiuxia Yang & Yazhou Yuan, 2017. "Economic Dispatch with Demand Response in Smart Grid: Bargaining Model and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Motalleb, Mahdi & Siano, Pierluigi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2019. "Networked Stackelberg Competition in a Demand Response Market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 680-691.
    16. Wang, Haiyang & Li, Ke & Zhang, Chenghui & Chen, Jianfei, 2024. "Capacity and operation joint optimization for integrated energy system based on Nash bargaining game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    17. Kristiansen, Martin & Korpås, Magnus & Svendsen, Harald G., 2018. "A generic framework for power system flexibility analysis using cooperative game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 223-232.
    18. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Früh, Wolf-Gerrit & Flynn, David, 2017. "Game-theoretic modeling of curtailment rules and network investments with distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 174-187.
    19. Voswinkel, Simon & Höckner, Jonas & Khalid, Abuzar & Weber, Christoph, 2022. "Sharing congestion management costs among system operators using the Shapley value," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    20. Jing, Rui & Wang, Meng & Liang, Hao & Wang, Xiaonan & Li, Ning & Shah, Nilay & Zhao, Yingru, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of a neighborhood-level urban energy network: Considering Game-theory inspired multi-benefit allocation constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 534-548.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3982-:d:393495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.