IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v280y2020ics0306261920313982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison study on trading behavior and profit distribution in local energy transaction games

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yang
  • Park, Byungkwon
  • Kou, Xiao
  • Hu, Mengqi
  • Dong, Jin
  • Li, Fangxing
  • Amasyali, Kadir
  • Olama, Mohammed

Abstract

With the increasing integration of distributed energy resources, localized peer-to-peer energy transactions are receiving more attention since they could absorb more distributed renewables locally and stabilize the power grid. To better study the trading behavior and provide guidance for a viable local market design, different game-theoretical frameworks including cooperative and non-cooperative games are established and compared in this study. For the cooperative grand coalition, the maximum social welfare is guaranteed, the Shapley value and bargaining based approaches are implemented for further profit redistribution. It is shown that the asymmetrical bargaining power can be critical in the final payment clearing and it is equivalent to the Shapley value allocation if prosumers bargain based on their marginal contributions. Non-cooperative trading is formulated by using a Stackelberg bilevel model in which the upper level has the privilege in internal price setting. However, system optimum is not obtained due to competition, and the selfish leader could take away 89% of the collective benefit by price-gap based arbitraging. Aiming for a long-lasting trading market, a virtual benevolent leader and a uniform price structure in which purchase price equals selling price are tested. Experimental results indicate that maximum social welfare and a fairer profit allocation can be achieved with a uniform price structure, regardless of the selfish or benevolent attitude.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yang & Park, Byungkwon & Kou, Xiao & Hu, Mengqi & Dong, Jin & Li, Fangxing & Amasyali, Kadir & Olama, Mohammed, 2020. "A comparison study on trading behavior and profit distribution in local energy transaction games," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:280:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920313982
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920313982
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kicsiny, R. & Varga, Z. & Scarelli, A., 2014. "Backward induction algorithm for a class of closed-loop Stackelberg games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1021-1036.
    2. Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Yuen, Chau & Morstyn, Thomas & McCulloch, Malcolm D. & Poor, H. Vincent & Wood, Kristin L., 2019. "A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 10-20.
    3. Motalleb, Mahdi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2017. "Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 581-596.
    4. Wang, Yifei & Wang, Xiuli & Shao, Chengcheng & Gong, Naiwei, 2020. "Distributed energy trading for an integrated energy system and electric vehicle charging stations: A Nash bargaining game approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 513-530.
    5. Chen, Yang & Hu, Mengqi, 2016. "Balancing collective and individual interests in transactive energy management of interconnected micro-grid clusters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1075-1085.
    6. Zhang, Bingying & Li, Qiqiang & Wang, Luhao & Feng, Wei, 2018. "Robust optimization for energy transactions in multi-microgrids under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 346-360.
    7. Nikmehr, Nima & Najafi-Ravadanegh, Sajad & Khodaei, Amin, 2017. "Probabilistic optimal scheduling of networked microgrids considering time-based demand response programs under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 267-279.
    8. Mehri Arsoon, Milad & Moghaddas-Tafreshi, Seyed Masoud, 2020. "Peer-to-peer energy bartering for the resilience response enhancement of networked microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    9. Mei, Jie & Chen, Chen & Wang, Jianhui & Kirtley, James L., 2019. "Coalitional game theory based local power exchange algorithm for networked microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 133-141.
    10. Fan, Songli & Ai, Qian & Piao, Longjian, 2018. "Bargaining-based cooperative energy trading for distribution company and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 469-482.
    11. An, Qingxian & Wen, Yao & Ding, Tao & Li, Yongli, 2019. "Resource sharing and payoff allocation in a three-stage system: Integrating network DEA with the Shapley value method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 16-25.
    12. Guajardo, Mario & Jörnsten, Kurt, 2015. "Common mistakes in computing the nucleolus," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 931-935.
    13. Chen, Yue & Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Wu, Qiuwei & Mei, Shengwei, 2018. "Analyzing and validating the economic efficiency of managing a cluster of energy hubs in multi-carrier energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 403-416.
    14. Thomas Morstyn & Niall Farrell & Sarah J. Darby & Malcolm D. McCulloch, 2018. "Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 94-101, February.
    15. Wang, Jianxiao & Zhong, Haiwang & Wu, Chenye & Du, Ershun & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2019. "Incentivizing distributed energy resource aggregation in energy and capacity markets: An energy sharing scheme and mechanism design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    16. S. Yu & E. C. Ierland & H.-P. Weikard & X. Zhu, 2017. "Nash bargaining solutions for international climate agreements under different sets of bargaining weights," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 709-729, October.
    17. Cornélusse, Bertrand & Savelli, Iacopo & Paoletti, Simone & Giannitrapani, Antonio & Vicino, Antonio, 2019. "A community microgrid architecture with an internal local market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 547-560.
    18. Bertrand Corn'elusse & Iacopo Savelli & Simone Paoletti & Antonio Giannitrapani & Antonio Vicino, 2018. "A Community Microgrid Architecture with an Internal Local Market," Papers 1810.09803, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    19. Dahlberg, Joen & Göthe-Lundgren, Maud & Engevall, Stefan, 2017. "A note on the nonuniqueness of the Equal Profit Method," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 84-89.
    20. Zhang, Chenghua & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Cheng, Meng & Long, Chao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Ni & Liu, Ziyi & Heijnen, Petra & Warnier, Martijn, 2022. "A peer-to-peer market mechanism incorporating multi-energy coupling and cooperative behaviors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    2. Xuefeng Min & Yang Yu & Rui Zhao & Xin Xiong & Sen Du & Qin Mou & Wenjie Xu, 2023. "System Dynamics-Based Game Theoretical Analysis for Watershed Eco-Compensation Design: A Case Study in Tuojiang River, Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Ju, Liwei & Yin, Zhe & Zhou, Qingqing & Li, Qiaochu & Wang, Peng & Tian, Wenxu & Li, Peng & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "Nearly-zero carbon optimal operation model and benefit allocation strategy for a novel virtual power plant using carbon capture, power-to-gas, and waste incineration power in rural areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Dynge, Marthe Fogstad & Berg, Kjersti & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Cali, Ümit, 2023. "Local electricity market pricing mechanisms’ impact on welfare distribution, privacy and transparency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Cui, Shiting & Wu, Jun & Gao, Yao & Zhu, Ruijin, 2023. "A high altitude prosumer energy cooperation framework considering composite energy storage sharing and electric‑oxygen‑hydrogen flexible supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    6. Nie, Qingyun & Zhang, Lihui & Li, Songrui, 2022. "How can personal carbon trading be applied in electric vehicle subsidies? A Stackelberg game method in private vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    7. Mohseni, Shayan & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2023. "Energy trading and scheduling in networked microgrids using fuzzy bargaining game theory and distributionally robust optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    8. Cui, Shiting & Zhu, Ruijin & Wu, Jun, 2024. "A double layer energy cooperation framework for prosumer groups in high altitude areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Zeng, Lijun & Du, Wenjing & Zhang, Wencheng & Zhao, Laijun & Wang, Zhaohua, 2023. "An inter-provincial cooperation model under Renewable Portfolio Standard policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Hosseini Dolatabadi, Sayed Hamid & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Chen, Yang & Morales, Jose Luis, 2024. "A stochastic game-theoretic optimization approach for managing local electricity markets with electric vehicles and renewable sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    11. Wu, Chuantao & Chen, Cen & Ma, Yuncong & Li, Feiyu & Sui, Quan & Lin, Xiangning & Wei, Fanrong & Li, Zhengtian, 2022. "Enhancing resilient restoration of distribution systems utilizing electric vehicles and supporting incentive mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    12. Lonergan, Katherine Emma & Suter, Nicolas & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2023. "Energy systems modelling for just transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Jinglve Wang & Hongping Yuan, 2023. "Deciphering the Innovation Subsidy Puzzle: Government Choices amid Supply Chain Encroachment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-38, November.
    14. Zhang, Junxia & Li, Xingmei & Jia, Dongqing & Zhou, Yuexin, 2023. "A Bi-level programming for union battery swapping stations location-routing problem under joint distribution and cost allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    15. Bochun Zhan & Changsen Feng & Zhemin Lin & Xiaoyu Shao & Fushuan Wen, 2023. "Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading among Prosumers with Voltage Regulation Services Provision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Tang, Bao-Jun & Cao, Xi-Lin & Li, Ru & Xiang, Zhi-Bo & Zhang, Sen, 2024. "Economic and low-carbon planning for interconnected integrated energy systems considering emerging technologies and future development trends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    17. Li, Ling-Ling & Miao, Yan & Lim, Ming K. & Sethanan, Kanchana & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2024. "Integrated energy system for low-carbon economic operation optimization: Pareto compromise programming and master-slave game," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Yang, Peiwen & Fang, Debin & Wang, Shuyi, 2022. "Optimal trading mechanism for prosumer-centric local energy markets considering deviation assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Tushar, Wayes & Yuen, Chau & Saha, Tapan K. & Morstyn, Thomas & Chapman, Archie C. & Alam, M. Jan E. & Hanif, Sarmad & Poor, H. Vincent, 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy systems for connected communities: A review of recent advances and emerging challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    3. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    4. Filipe Bandeiras & Álvaro Gomes & Mário Gomes & Paulo Coelho, 2023. "Exploring Energy Trading Markets in Smart Grid and Microgrid Systems and Their Implications for Sustainability in Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.
    5. Gorbatcheva, Anna & Watson, Nicole & Schneiders, Alexandra & Shipworth, David & Fell, Michael J., 2024. "Defining characteristics of peer-to-peer energy trading, transactive energy, and community self-consumption: A review of literature and expert perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Bhatti, Bilal Ahmad & Broadwater, Robert, 2019. "Energy trading in the distribution system using a non-model based game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Hu, Qian & Zhu, Ziqing & Bu, Siqi & Wing Chan, Ka & Li, Fangxing, 2021. "A multi-market nanogrid P2P energy and ancillary service trading paradigm: Mechanisms and implementations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Wang, Lu & Gu, Wei & Wu, Zhi & Qiu, Haifeng & Pan, Guangsheng, 2020. "Non-cooperative game-based multilateral contract transactions in power-heating integrated systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Fioriti, Davide & Frangioni, Antonio & Poli, Davide, 2021. "Optimal sizing of energy communities with fair revenue sharing and exit clauses: Value, role and business model of aggregators and users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    11. Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Yuen, Chau & Azim, M. Imran & Morstyn, Thomas & Poor, H. Vincent & Niyato, Dustin & Bean, Richard, 2020. "A coalition formation game framework for peer-to-peer energy trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    12. Soto, Esteban A. & Bosman, Lisa B. & Wollega, Ebisa & Leon-Salas, Walter D., 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy trading: A review of the literature," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    13. Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Foivos Palaiogiannis & Iasonas Kouveliotis-Lysikatos & Panos Kotsampopoulos & Nikos Hatziargyriou, 2021. "Photovoltaics Enabling Sustainable Energy Communities: Technological Drivers and Emerging Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Wenting Zhao & Jun Lv & Xilong Yao & Juanjuan Zhao & Zhixin Jin & Yan Qiang & Zheng Che & Chunwu Wei, 2019. "Consortium Blockchain-Based Microgrid Market Transaction Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Savelli, Iacopo & Hepburn, Cameron & Morstyn, Thomas, 2024. "A blueprint for energy systems in the era of central bank digital currencies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Gan, Wei & Yan, Mingyu & Yao, Wei & Wen, Jinyu, 2021. "Peer to peer transactive energy for multiple energy hub with the penetration of high-level renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    17. Siripha Junlakarn & Phimsupha Kokchang & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Drivers and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Mustika, Alyssa Diva & Rigo-Mariani, Rémy & Debusschere, Vincent & Pachurka, Amaury, 2022. "A two-stage management strategy for the optimal operation and billing in an energy community with collective self-consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    19. Rodrigues, Daniel L. & Ye, Xianming & Xia, Xiaohua & Zhu, Bing, 2020. "Battery energy storage sizing optimisation for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    20. Yi Kuang & Xiuli Wang & Hongyang Zhao & Yijun Huang & Xianlong Chen & Xifan Wang, 2020. "Agent-Based Energy Sharing Mechanism Using Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:280:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920313982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.