IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v133y2014icp112-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable resource planning in energy markets

Author

Listed:
  • Kamalinia, Saeed
  • Shahidehpour, Mohammad
  • Wu, Lei

Abstract

This study investigates the role of sustainable energy volatility in a market participant’s competitive expansion planning problem. The incomplete information non-cooperative game-theoretic method is utilized in which each generation company (GENCO) perceives strategies of other market participants in order to make a decision on its strategic generation capacity expansion. Sustainable generation incentives, carbon emission penalties, and fuel price forecast errors are considered in the strategic decisions. The market clearing process for energy and reserves is simulated by each GENCO for deriving generation expansion decisions. A merit criterion (i.e., the utility value) is proposed for a more realistic calculation of the expected payoff of a GENCO with sustainable energy resources. Finally, the impact of transmission constraints is investigated on the GENCO’s expansion planning decision. The case studies illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamalinia, Saeed & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Wu, Lei, 2014. "Sustainable resource planning in energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 112-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:133:y:2014:i:c:p:112-120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191400748X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. anonymous, 2008. "The Center for Community Development Investments," Community Investments, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, vol. 20(Spr), pages 1-18.
    2. Oecd, 2008. "Developments in Fibre Technologies and Investment," OECD Digital Economy Papers 142, OECD Publishing.
    3. Ginés de Rus, 2008. "The Economic Effects of High Speed Rail Investment," OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers 2008/16, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Ni & Yan, Yu & Su, Wencong, 2015. "A game-theoretic economic operation of residential distribution system with high participation of distributed electricity prosumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 471-479.
    2. Sadeghi, Hadi & Rashidinejad, Masoud & Abdollahi, Amir, 2017. "A comprehensive sequential review study through the generation expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1369-1394.
    3. Munoz, Francisco D. & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Watson, Jean-Paul, 2017. "Does risk aversion affect transmission and generation planning? A Western North America case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 213-225.
    4. Chen, Qixin & Zou, Peng & Wu, Chenye & Zhang, Junliu & Li, Ming & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2017. "A Nash-Cournot approach to assessing flexible ramping products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 42-50.
    5. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Früh, Wolf-Gerrit & Flynn, David, 2017. "Game-theoretic modeling of curtailment rules and network investments with distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 174-187.
    6. Motalleb, Mahdi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2017. "Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 581-596.
    7. Wang, Lixiao & Jing, Z.X. & Zheng, J.H. & Wu, Q.H. & Wei, Feng, 2018. "Decentralized optimization of coordinated electrical and thermal generations in hierarchical integrated energy systems considering competitive individuals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 607-622.
    8. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    9. Dehghani, Hamed & Vahidi, Behrooz & Hosseinian, Seyed Hossein, 2017. "Wind farms participation in electricity markets considering uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 907-918.
    10. Shi, Kaifang & Chen, Yun & Yu, Bailang & Xu, Tingbao & Chen, Zuoqi & Liu, Rui & Li, Linyi & Wu, Jianping, 2016. "Modeling spatiotemporal CO2 (carbon dioxide) emission dynamics in China from DMSP-OLS nighttime stable light data using panel data analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 523-533.
    11. Fu, Xueqian & Zhang, Xiurong & Qiao, Zheng & Li, Gengyin, 2019. "Estimating the failure probability in an integrated energy system considering correlations among failure patterns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 656-666.
    12. He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Yun & Bai, Lingquan & Zhang, Baosen, 2020. "Smart energy storage management via information systems design," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caginalp, Gunduz & DeSantis, Mark, 2017. "Does price efficiency increase with trading volume? Evidence of nonlinearity and power laws in ETFs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 436-452.
    2. Rassier, Dylan G. & Earnhart, Dietrich, 2015. "Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 129-140.
    3. Wolski, Marcin & van de Leur, Michiel, 2016. "Interbank loans, collateral and modern monetary policy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 388-416.
    4. Adry Liliana Manrique Lagos, 2019. "De la reflexión a la práctica: experiencias y reflexiones en la formación docente," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, number 31.
    5. Frank Bodendorf & Barbara Hollweck & Jörg Franke, 2022. "Information Asymmetry in Business-to-Business Negotiations: A Game Theoretical Approach to Support Purchasing Decisions with Suppliers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 723-745, August.
    6. Marti-Henneberg, Jordi, 2015. "Attracting travellers to the high-speed train: a methodology for comparing potential demand between stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 145-156.
    7. Van der Wee, Marlies & Verbrugge, Sofie & Sadowski, Bert & Driesse, Menno & Pickavet, Mario, 2015. "Identifying and quantifying the indirect benefits of broadband networks for e-government and e-business: A bottom-up approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 176-191.
    8. Westin, Jonas & Kågeson, Per, 2011. "Can high speed rail offset its embedded emissions?," Working papers in Transport Economics 2011:16, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    9. Campos, Javier & de Rus, Ginés, 2009. "Some stylized facts about high-speed rail: A review of HSR experiences around the world," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 19-28, January.
    10. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    11. Vitaly Pruzhansky, 2014. "Luxury goods, vertical restraints and internet sales," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 227-246, October.
    12. Mario Pietrunti, 2010. "Regulation and Investment Incentives for Next Generation Broadband Access Networks," Chapters, in: Morten Falch & Jan Markendahl (ed.), Promoting New Telecom Infrastructures, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Li, Hui & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Kangyin, 2021. "Policy analysis for high-speed rail in China: Evolution, evaluation, and expectation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 37-53.
    14. Chen, Zhenhua & Xue, Junbo & Rose, Adam Z. & Haynes, Kingsley E., 2016. "The impact of high-speed rail investment on economic and environmental change in China: A dynamic CGE analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 232-245.
    15. Marijn A. Weele & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Menno Groen & Ellen H. M. Moors, 2020. "Gimme shelter? Heterogeneous preferences for tangible and intangible resources when choosing an incubator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 984-1015, August.
    16. Henry Antonio Mendoza Tolosa & Carlos Andrés Yanes Guerra, 2014. "Impacto del gasto público en la dinámica económica regional," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 6(1), pages 23-41, April.
    17. Rendon, Juan & Plückebaum, Thomas & Jay, Stephan, 2009. "LRIC cost approaches for differentiated QoS in broadband networks," WIK Discussion Papers 325, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    18. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Holzleitner, Christian, 2014. "Efficient contracts for government intervention in promoting next generation communications networks," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-022, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, Héctor S. & Givoni, Moshe, 2012. "The accessibility impact of a new High-Speed Rail line in the UK – a preliminary analysis of winners and losers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 105-114.
    20. Schmelzer, Matthias, 2015. "The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 262-271.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:133:y:2014:i:c:p:112-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.