IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v185y2017ip1p805-813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Streamlined life cycle analysis for assessing energy and exergy performance as well as impact on the climate for landfill gas utilization technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Friesenhan, Christian
  • Agirre, Ion
  • Eltrop, Ludger
  • Arias, Pedro L.

Abstract

Three landfill gas (LFG) valorization technologies were compared using energy and exergy efficiency and a streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The technologies were (i) steam reforming and hydrogen utilization in an in situ cogeneration fuel cell (SR-IS-FCC), (ii) biogas utilization in an in situ gas engine cogeneration plant (IS-GEC), and (iii) amine scrubbing and biomethane utilization in an ex situ gas engine cogeneration plant (AS-ES-GEC). The SR-IS-FCC alternative recorded the highest exergy efficiency and savings in cumulative energy demand (CED), and the lowest global warming potential (GWP) when all the heat is utilized in situ; otherwise, the highest exergy efficiency and the lowest GWP and CED were associated with the AS-ES-GEC alternative. The results indicate that AS-ES-GEC is the preferential choice when heat cannot be utilized in situ. Otherwise, SR-IS-FCC records the best values for the three criteria, and the AS-ES-GEC technology is the least interesting alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Friesenhan, Christian & Agirre, Ion & Eltrop, Ludger & Arias, Pedro L., 2017. "Streamlined life cycle analysis for assessing energy and exergy performance as well as impact on the climate for landfill gas utilization technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 805-813.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p1:p:805-813
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916315434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & Ferruzzi, Gabriele & Palombo, Adolfo, 2015. "Molten carbonate fuel cell: An experimental analysis of a 1kW system fed by landfill gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 146-160.
    2. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    3. Duan, Liqiang & Zhao, Mingde & Yang, Yongping, 2012. "Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 107-116.
    4. Xavier Labandeira & José M. Labeaga & Xiral López-Otero, 2011. "Energy Demand for Heating in Spain: An Empirical Analysis with Policy Purposes," Working Papers 06-2011, Economics for Energy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Park, Ho Young & Han, Karam & Kim, Hyun Hee & Park, Sangbin & Jang, Jihoon & Yu, Geun Sil & Ko, Ji Ho, 2020. "Comparisons of combustion characteristics between bioliquid and heavy fuel oil combustion in a 0.7 MWth pilot furnace and a 75 MWe utility boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    3. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, Saeed & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mahmoudi, Seyed Bagher, 2019. "A review on beet sugar industry with a focus on implementation of waste-to-energy strategy for power supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 423-442.
    4. Aloys Martial Ekoe A Akata & Donatien Njomo & Basant Agrawal & Auguste Mackpayen & Abdel-Hamid Mahamat Ali, 2022. "Tilt Angle and Orientation Assessment of Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) System for Sub-Saharan Tropical Regions: Case Study Douala, Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Dan Cudjoe, 2023. "Energy-economics and environmental prospects of integrated waste-to-energy projects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12597-12628, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Zhang, Xiaosong & Chen, Yi & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Assessment of a combined cooling, heating and power system by synthetic use of biogas and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 922-935.
    2. Liqiang Xu & Qiufang Cui & Te Tu & Shuo Liu & Long Ji & Shuiping Yan, 2020. "Waste heat recovery from the stripped gas in carbon capture process by membrane technology: Hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic membrane cases," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 421-435, April.
    3. Fardadi, Mahshid & McLarty, Dustin F. & Jabbari, Faryar, 2016. "Investigation of thermal control for different SOFC flow geometries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 43-55.
    4. Li, Wenjia & Ling, Yunyi & Liu, Xiangxin & Hao, Yong, 2017. "Performance analysis of a photovoltaic-thermochemical hybrid system prototype," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 939-947.
    5. Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Dryjańska, Aleksandra, 2015. "Possibilities for improving the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of an oxy-type power plant with a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 45-61.
    6. Li, Chunxi & Guo, Shiqi & Ye, Xuemin & Fu, Wenfeng, 2019. "Performance and thermoeconomics of solar-aided double-reheat coal-fired power systems with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "Proposal and assessment of a novel integrated CCHP system with biogas steam reforming using solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Stanisław Kruczyński & Wojciech Kamela, 2019. "Evaluation of Using Biogas to Supply the Dual Fuel Diesel Engine of an Agricultural Tractor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Ostrycharczyk, Michał & Czerep, Michał & Plutecki, Zbigniew, 2019. "Potential and methods for increasing the flexibility and efficiency of the lignite fired power unit, using integrated lignite drying," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1142-1151.
    10. Wang, Dandan & Li, Sheng & Liu, Feng & Gao, Lin & Sui, Jun, 2018. "Post combustion CO2 capture in power plant using low temperature steam upgraded by double absorption heat transformer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 603-612.
    11. Gordeeva, L.G. & Aristov, Yu.I., 2019. "Adsorptive heat storage and amplification: New cycles and adsorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 440-453.
    12. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    13. Tsipis, E.V. & Agarkov, D.A. & Borisov, Yu.A. & Kiseleva, S.V. & Tarasenko, A.B. & Bredikhin, S.I. & Kharton, V.V., 2023. "Waste gas utilization potential for solid oxide fuel cells: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Parham, Kiyan & Khamooshi, Mehrdad & Tematio, Daniel Boris Kenfack & Yari, Mortaza & Atikol, Uğur, 2014. "Absorption heat transformers – A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 430-452.
    16. Xin Zhao & Yanqi Chen & Gang Xu & Heng Chen, 2022. "Economic Assessment of Operation Strategies on Park-Level Integrated Energy System Coupled with Biogas: A Case Study in a Sewage Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Kefang Zhang & Zhongliang Liu & Zhaoliang Wang & Yanxia Li, 2016. "Specific exergy consumption as an index for steam extraction scheme selection for CO 2 capture systems in coal‐fired power plants," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 275-287, April.
    18. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Valiani, Saba & Tahouni, Nassim & Panjeshahi, M. Hassan, 2017. "Optimization of pre-combustion capture for thermal power plants using Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 950-960.
    20. George Mallouppas & Elias Ar. Yfantis & Constantina Ioannou & Andreas Paradeisiotis & Angelos Ktoris, 2023. "Application of Biogas and Biomethane as Maritime Fuels: A Review of Research, Technology Development, Innovation Proposals, and Market Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p1:p:805-813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.