IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2022i1p80-d1010511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Assessment of Operation Strategies on Park-Level Integrated Energy System Coupled with Biogas: A Case Study in a Sewage Treatment Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Zhao

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yanqi Chen

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Gang Xu

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Heng Chen

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

Operation strategies for a park-level integrated energy system (PIES) in terms of carbon prices and feed-in tariffs, have not been adequately studied. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by proposing operation strategies based on the PIES driven by biogas, solar energy, natural gas, and the power grid. Meanwhile, the electricity-driven dispatching strategy (EDS), thermal-driven dispatching strategy (TDS), cost-driven dispatching strategy (CDS) are compared to assess their impacts on operation cost, carbon dioxide emissions, etc. The flexibility and complementarity of the three operation strategies in energy supply are analyzed in detail. The results indicated that biogas was the main energy supply fuel, accounting for 46% to 72% of the total energy supply. About 33% to 54% of electricity was transmitted to the grid each month using the TDS. The annual initial capital cost of the CDS was only 1.39% higher than that of the EDS. However, the annual operation cost of the EDS was 16.86% higher than that of the CDS. The emissions of the EDS were the lowest, and the CDS had 38.51% higher emissions than the EDS. In the CDS, the ratio of carbon emission costs to operation costs was as high as 0.80 when the carbon tax reached USD 100/ton. The carbon tax had a greater impact on the CDS than the other strategies. Feed-in tariffs had a greater impact than the carbon tax on the TDS. This study provides an effective method for the selection of optimal operation strategies in regards to carbon prices and feed-in tariffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Zhao & Yanqi Chen & Gang Xu & Heng Chen, 2022. "Economic Assessment of Operation Strategies on Park-Level Integrated Energy System Coupled with Biogas: A Case Study in a Sewage Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:80-:d:1010511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ju, Liwei & Tan, Zhongfu & Li, Huanhuan & Tan, Qingkun & Yu, Xiaobao & Song, Xiaohua, 2016. "Multi-objective operation optimization and evaluation model for CCHP and renewable energy based hybrid energy system driven by distributed energy resources in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 322-340.
    2. Zheng, C.Y. & Wu, J.Y. & Zhai, X.Q., 2014. "A novel operation strategy for CCHP systems based on minimum distance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 325-335.
    3. Wang, Jiangjiang & Sui, Jun & Jin, Hongguang, 2015. "An improved operation strategy of combined cooling heating and power system following electrical load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 654-666.
    4. Rong, Aiying & Lahdelma, Risto, 2005. "An efficient linear programming model and optimization algorithm for trigeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 40-63, September.
    5. Anna Sobczak & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Monika Różycka & Jacek Stasiak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Petrollese, Mario & Cocco, Daniele, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of hybrid CSP-biogas power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 420-431.
    7. Li, Miao & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Ma, Baoyu, 2016. "Optimal design and operation strategy for integrated evaluation of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 202-220.
    8. Qian, Jiaxin & Wu, Jiahui & Yao, Lei & Mahmut, Saniye & Zhang, Qiang, 2021. "Comprehensive performance evaluation of Wind-Solar-CCHP system based on emergy analysis and multi-objective decision method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Smith, Amanda D. & Mago, Pedro J., 2014. "Effects of load-following operational methods on combined heat and power system efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 337-351.
    10. Carvalho, Monica & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M., 2012. "Multicriteria synthesis of trigeneration systems considering economic and environmental aspects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 245-254.
    11. Adrian Neacșa & Mirela Panait & Jianu Daniel Mureșan & Marian Catalin Voica & Otilia Manta, 2022. "The Energy Transition between Desideratum and Challenge: Are Cogeneration and Trigeneration the Best Solution?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Zhao, Xin & Zheng, Wenyu & Hou, Zhihua & Chen, Heng & Xu, Gang & Liu, Wenyi & Chen, Honggang, 2022. "Economic dispatch of multi-energy system considering seasonal variation based on hybrid operation strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    13. Mehr, A.S. & Gandiglio, M. & MosayebNezhad, M. & Lanzini, A. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Santarelli, M., 2017. "Solar-assisted integrated biogas solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) installation in wastewater treatment plant: Energy and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 620-638.
    14. Cho, Heejin & Mago, Pedro J. & Luck, Rogelio & Chamra, Louay M., 2009. "Evaluation of CCHP systems performance based on operational cost, primary energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emission by utilizing an optimal operation scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(12), pages 2540-2549, December.
    15. Bruno, Joan Carles & Ortega-López, Víctor & Coronas, Alberto, 2009. "Integration of absorption cooling systems into micro gas turbine trigeneration systems using biogas: Case study of a sewage treatment plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 837-847, June.
    16. Jia, Zhijie & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Brink, Corjan & Vollebergh, Herman R.J. & van der Werf, Edwin, 2016. "Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 603-617.
    18. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun, 2010. "A MILP model for integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 1001-1014, March.
    19. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    20. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2018. "Novel performance curves to determine optimal operation of CCHP systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1009-1036.
    21. Liting Zhang & Weijun Gao & Yongwen Yang & Fanyue Qian, 2020. "Impacts of Investment Cost, Energy Prices and Carbon Tax on Promoting the Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (CCHP) System of an Amusement Park Resort in Shanghai," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    22. Zhang, Guoqiang & Li, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Na, 2017. "Performance analysis of a novel low CO2-emission solar hybrid combined cycle power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 152-162.
    23. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Photovoltaic Market in Poland and the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    24. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Xu, Zi-Long & Jin, Hong-Guang & Shi, Guo-hua & Fu, Chao & Yang, Kun, 2014. "Design optimization and analysis of a biomass gasification based BCHP system: A case study in Harbin, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 572-583.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kang, Ligai & Yang, Junhong & An, Qingsong & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Jun & Wang, Hui & Li, Zelin, 2017. "Effects of load following operational strategy on CCHP system with an auxiliary ground source heat pump considering carbon tax and electricity feed in tariff," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 454-466.
    2. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Cotton, James S. & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2020. "Urban community energy systems design under uncertainty for specified levels of carbon dioxide emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2018. "Novel performance curves to determine optimal operation of CCHP systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1009-1036.
    4. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Zhang, Xiaosong & Chen, Yi & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Assessment of a combined cooling, heating and power system by synthetic use of biogas and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 922-935.
    5. Zheng, Xuyue & Wu, Guoce & Qiu, Yuwei & Zhan, Xiangyan & Shah, Nilay & Li, Ning & Zhao, Yingru, 2018. "A MINLP multi-objective optimization model for operational planning of a case study CCHP system in urban China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1126-1140.
    6. Chen, W.D. & Chua, K.J., 2022. "A novel and optimized operation strategy map for CCHP systems considering optimal thermal energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Huang, Chang & Yan, Yixian & Madonski, Rafal & Zhang, Qi & Deng, Hui, 2023. "Improving operation strategies for solar-based distributed energy systems: Matching system design with operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Hou, Hongjuan & Wu, Jiwen & Ding, Zeyu & Yang, Bo & Hu, Eric, 2021. "Performance analysis of a solar-assisted combined cooling, heating and power system with an improved operation strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Li, Longxi & Yu, Shiwei & Mu, Hailin & Li, Huanan, 2018. "Optimization and evaluation of CCHP systems considering incentive policies under different operation strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 825-840.
    10. Li, Longxi & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Li, Miao, 2016. "Economic and environmental optimization for distributed energy resource systems coupled with district energy networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 947-960.
    11. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhai, Zhiqiang (John), 2011. "Performance comparison of combined cooling heating and power system in different operation modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4621-4631.
    12. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2017. "Optimal design, operation and analytical criteria for determining optimal operating modes of a CCHP with fired HRSG, boiler, electric chiller and absorption chiller," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1052-1065.
    13. Jiang-Jiang, Wang & Chun-Fa, Zhang & You-Yin, Jing, 2010. "Multi-criteria analysis of combined cooling, heating and power systems in different climate zones in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1247-1259, April.
    14. Han, Jie & Ouyang, Leixin & Xu, Yuzhen & Zeng, Rong & Kang, Shushuo & Zhang, Guoqiang, 2016. "Current status of distributed energy system in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 288-297.
    15. Zhang, Chong & Xue, Xue & Du, Qianzhou & Luo, Yimo & Gang, Wenjie, 2019. "Study on the performance of distributed energy systems based on historical loads considering parameter uncertainties for decision making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 778-791.
    16. Jradi, M. & Riffat, S., 2014. "Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 396-415.
    17. Li, Fan & Sun, Bo & Zhang, Chenghui & Zhang, Lizhi, 2018. "Operation optimization for combined cooling, heating, and power system with condensation heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 305-316.
    18. Tian, Zhe & Niu, Jide & Lu, Yakai & He, Shunming & Tian, Xue, 2016. "The improvement of a simulation model for a distributed CCHP system and its influence on optimal operation cost and strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 430-444.
    19. Zhao Luo & Wei Gu & Yong Sun & Xiang Yin & Yiyuan Tang & Xiaodong Yuan, 2016. "Performance Analysis of the Combined Operation of Interconnected-BCCHP Microgrids in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Wu, Haifeng & Liu, Qibin & Xie, Gengxin & Guo, Shaopeng & Zheng, Jie & Su, Bosheng, 2020. "Performance investigation of a novel hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system with solar thermochemistry in different climate zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:80-:d:1010511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.