IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v157y2015icp399-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressurized hydrogen production by fixed-bed chemical looping

Author

Listed:
  • Voitic, Gernot
  • Nestl, Stephan
  • Lammer, Michael
  • Wagner, Julian
  • Hacker, Viktor

Abstract

Fuel cell cars powered by hydrogen enable CO2-emission free mobility. A main requirement for the success of this technology is the availability of an area-wide and affordable hydrogen supply. A significant cost factor in the hydrogen supply chain is the multi-stage gas compression to provide the mandatory filling pressure for the pressurized tanks. One way to address this issue is to perform the hydrogen production process at elevated pressure. In this paper the feasibility of compressed hydrogen production without additional gas compression based on the steam iron process is discussed. Experiments were performed in a lab-scale test rig using fixed bed reactor technology. The focus was to evaluate the influence of pressurized hydrogen production on the cycle stability, on the conversion efficiency and on the structural integrity of a Fe2O3–Al2O3 (90+10wt%) oxygen carrier. The oxidations were performed at different pressure levels of 7–22bar (g) at a temperature of 750°C with steam. The steady steam supply was ensured by a HPLC pump which delivered 0.03gmin−1 (at room temperature) of water, which was evaporated in the heated inlet section. The water was introduced for approximately 100min until the oxygen carrier was fully oxidized. The iron oxide was reduced in the subsequent reaction steps at 750°C and ambient pressure with 25Nmlmin−1 H2 as reducing agent. The reduction reactions were analyzed to evaluate possible influences of its prior oxidations. The results revealed no signs of negative repercussions. The oxygen carrier conversion of initially 84% remained at a steady behavior between the 15 performed cycles. Only small losses of 0.8% per cycle caused by thermal sintering of the contact mass were observed, which was independent from the different pressure levels of the prior oxidations. The evaluation of the pressurized oxidations did not reveal any performance decrease as well. The rise of pressure in each oxidation showed a consistent characteristic throughout the complete test series. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the oxygen carrier sample after the experiment revealed some structural changes, which are related to thermal sintering but the structural integrity of the sample stayed intact. The oxidations yielded an average of 18mmolgFe−1 hydrogen with a maximum hydrogen pressure of 22bar (g). The conducted experiments showed that the steam iron process is very suitable for the production of compressed hydrogen and that the process is not negatively influenced by the elevated system pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Voitic, Gernot & Nestl, Stephan & Lammer, Michael & Wagner, Julian & Hacker, Viktor, 2015. "Pressurized hydrogen production by fixed-bed chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 399-407.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:157:y:2015:i:c:p:399-407
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915003979
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Shuai & Xiao, Rui & Zheng, Wenguang, 2014. "Comparative study between fluidized-bed and fixed-bed operation modes in pressurized chemical looping combustion of coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 181-189.
    2. Cho, Won Chul & Lee, Do Yeon & Seo, Myung Won & Kim, Sang Done & Kang, KyoungSoo & Bae, Ki Kwang & Kim, Change Hee & Jeong, SeongUk & Park, Chu Sik, 2014. "Continuous operation characteristics of chemical looping hydrogen production system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1667-1674.
    3. Tong, Andrew & Bayham, Samuel & Kathe, Mandar V. & Zeng, Liang & Luo, Siwei & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2014. "Iron-based syngas chemical looping process and coal-direct chemical looping process development at Ohio State University," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1836-1845.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Ming & Yi, Yang & Wang, Shuzhong & Wang, Zhuliang & Du, Min & Pan, Jianfeng & Wang, Qian, 2018. "Review of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3186-3214.
    2. Qiu, Yu & Zhang, Shuai & Cui, Dongxu & Li, Min & Zeng, Jimin & Zeng, Dewang & Xiao, Rui, 2019. "Enhanced hydrogen production performance at intermediate temperatures through the synergistic effects of binary oxygen carriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Magnin, Jean-Pierre & Deseure, Jonathan, 2019. "Hydrogen generation in a pressurized photobioreactor: Unexpected enhancement of biohydrogen production by the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 635-643.
    4. Hua, Xiuning & Fan, Yiran & Wang, Yidi & Fu, Tiantian & Fowler, G.D. & Zhao, Dongmei & Wang, Wei, 2017. "The behaviour of multiple reaction fronts during iron (III) oxide reduction in a non-steady state packed bed for chemical looping water splitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 96-111.
    5. Cho, Won Chul & Lee, Doyeon & Kim, Chang Hee & Cho, Hyun Suk & Kim, Sang Done, 2018. "Feasibility study of the use of by-product iron oxide and industrial off-gas for application to chemical looping hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 466-481.
    6. Zhang, Hao & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Deng, Ya'nan & Jin, Hongguang & Kang, Qilan, 2018. "Development of a chemical-looping combustion reactor having porous honeycomb chamber and experimental validation by using NiO/NiAl2O4," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    7. Lu, Xuao & Rahman, Ryad A. & Lu, Dennis Y. & Ridha, Firas N. & Duchesne, Marc A. & Tan, Yewen & Hughes, Robin W., 2016. "Pressurized chemical looping combustion with CO: Reduction reactivity and oxygen-transport capacity of ilmenite ore," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 132-139.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hao & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Deng, Ya'nan & Jin, Hongguang & Kang, Qilan, 2018. "Development of a chemical-looping combustion reactor having porous honeycomb chamber and experimental validation by using NiO/NiAl2O4," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    2. Cho, Won Chul & Lee, Jun Kyu & Nam, Gyeong Duk & Kim, Chang Hee & Cho, Hyun-Seok & Joo, Jong Hoon, 2019. "Degradation analysis of mixed ionic-electronic conductor-supported iron-oxide oxygen carriers for chemical-looping conversion of methane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 644-657.
    3. Zeng, Jimin & Xiao, Rui & Zhang, Shuai & Zhang, Huiyan & Zeng, Dewang & Qiu, Yu & Ma, Zhong, 2018. "Identifying iron-based oxygen carrier reduction during biomass chemical looping gasification on a thermogravimetric fixed-bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 404-412.
    4. Chen, Liangyong & Bao, Jinhua & Kong, Liang & Combs, Megan & Nikolic, Heather S. & Fan, Zhen & Liu, Kunlei, 2016. "The direct solid-solid reaction between coal char and iron-based oxygen carrier and its contribution to solid-fueled chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 9-18.
    5. Fan, Yuyang & Tippayawong, Nakorn & Wei, Guoqiang & Huang, Zhen & Zhao, Kun & Jiang, Liqun & Zheng, Anqing & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin, 2020. "Minimizing tar formation whilst enhancing syngas production by integrating biomass torrefaction pretreatment with chemical looping gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    7. Xiaosong Zhang & Sheng Li & Hongguang Jin, 2014. "A Polygeneration System Based on Multi-Input Chemical Looping Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Zhu, Min & Chen, Shiyi & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Hu, Jun & Sun, Zhao & Ma, Shiwei & Xiang, Wenguo, 2018. "Effects of supports on reduction activity and carbon deposition of iron oxide for methane chemical looping hydrogen generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 912-921.
    9. Li, Fang-zhou & Kang, Jing-xian & Song, Yun-cai & Feng, Jie & Li, Wen-ying, 2020. "Thermodynamic feasibility for molybdenum-based gaseous oxides assisted looping coal gasification and its derived power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Ping Wang & Nicholas Means & Dushyant Shekhawat & David Berry & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2015. "Chemical-Looping Combustion and Gasification of Coals and Oxygen Carrier Development: A Brief Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, September.
    11. Xiang, Dong & Jin, Tong & Lei, Xinru & Liu, Shuai & Jiang, Yong & Dong, Zhongbing & Tao, Quanbao & Cao, Yan, 2018. "The high efficient synthesis of natural gas from a joint-feedstock of coke-oven gas and pulverized coke via a chemical looping combustion scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 944-954.
    12. Zhang, Shuai & Xiao, Rui & Zheng, Wenguang, 2014. "Comparative study between fluidized-bed and fixed-bed operation modes in pressurized chemical looping combustion of coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 181-189.
    13. Xing Chen & Shuai Zhang & Rui Xiao & Peng Li, 2017. "Modification of traditionally impregnated Fe 2 O 3 /Al 2 O 3 oxygen carriers by ultrasonic method and their performance in chemical looping combustion," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 65-77, February.
    14. Sarafraz, M.M. & Jafarian, M. & Arjomandi, M. & Nathan, G.J., 2017. "Potential use of liquid metal oxides for chemical looping gasification: A thermodynamic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 702-712.
    15. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    16. Nandy, Anirban & Loha, Chanchal & Gu, Sai & Sarkar, Pinaki & Karmakar, Malay K. & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2016. "Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 597-619.
    17. Medrano, J.A. & Hamers, H.P. & Williams, G. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2015. "NiO/CaAl2O4 as active oxygen carrier for low temperature chemical looping applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 86-96.
    18. Qiang Tian & Lixin Che & Bin Ding & Qianwei Wang & Qingquan Su, 2017. "Performance of Cu‐Fe‐based oxygen carrier in a CLC process based on fixed bed reactors," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 731-744, August.
    19. Kobayashi, Makoto & Akiho, Hiroyuki & Ozawa, Yasushi & Nakajima, Akira, 2019. "Verification of proper operation of dry acid gas removal process on syngas derived by O2/CO2-blown gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Tang, Mingchen & Xu, Long & Fan, Maohong, 2015. "Progress in oxygen carrier development of methane-based chemical-looping reforming: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 143-156.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:157:y:2015:i:c:p:399-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.