IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v151y2015icp143-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progress in oxygen carrier development of methane-based chemical-looping reforming: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Mingchen
  • Xu, Long
  • Fan, Maohong

Abstract

This work comprehensively reviews the recent advances for chemical-looping reforming of CH4 (CLR) technology, which breaks down the traditional CH4 reforming process (including steam and dry reforming) into two separate half-steps, namely CH4 oxidation and replenishment of oxygen carrier (OC) with appropriate oxidizing agents. In order to steer the conversion of CH4 toward partial oxidation (POM) for synthesis gas (H2+CO) production rather than total oxidation for producing CO2 and H2O, the appropriate selection of OC becomes a critical issue. Moreover, instead of the commonly used air to re-oxidize the oxygen-depleted OC after reaction with CH4, steam and CO2 have been proposed as two alternatives, opening up the opportunities to produce extra H2 and CO. However, owing to much weaker oxidization ability of steam and CO2 than air, the low oxidation degree and slow oxidation rate seem to remain as challenges. Furthermore, the resistance of OC to attrition, agglomeration and carbon deposition is also of great importance. In these regards, the latest major milestones are compiled.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Mingchen & Xu, Long & Fan, Maohong, 2015. "Progress in oxygen carrier development of methane-based chemical-looping reforming: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 143-156.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:151:y:2015:i:c:p:143-156
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915004729
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rydén, Magnus & Leion, Henrik & Mattisson, Tobias & Lyngfelt, Anders, 2014. "Combined oxides as oxygen-carrier material for chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1924-1932.
    2. Zhang, Yongxing & Doroodchi, Elham & Moghtaderi, Behdad, 2014. "Chemical looping combustion of ultra low concentration of methane with Fe2O3/Al2O3 and CuO/SiO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1916-1923.
    3. Tong, Andrew & Bayham, Samuel & Kathe, Mandar V. & Zeng, Liang & Luo, Siwei & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2014. "Iron-based syngas chemical looping process and coal-direct chemical looping process development at Ohio State University," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1836-1845.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Fang-zhou & Kang, Jing-xian & Song, Yun-cai & Feng, Jie & Li, Wen-ying, 2020. "Thermodynamic feasibility for molybdenum-based gaseous oxides assisted looping coal gasification and its derived power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Ping Wang & Nicholas Means & Dushyant Shekhawat & David Berry & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2015. "Chemical-Looping Combustion and Gasification of Coals and Oxygen Carrier Development: A Brief Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, September.
    3. Zhang, Hao & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Deng, Ya'nan & Jin, Hongguang & Kang, Qilan, 2018. "Development of a chemical-looping combustion reactor having porous honeycomb chamber and experimental validation by using NiO/NiAl2O4," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    4. Kang, Dohyung & Lim, Hyun Suk & Lee, Minbeom & Lee, Jae W., 2018. "Syngas production on a Ni-enhanced Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier via chemical looping partial oxidation with dry reforming of methane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 174-186.
    5. Zhang, Hao & Liu, Xiangyu & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Characteristics of a 10 kW honeycomb reactor for natural gas fueled chemical-looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 285-292.
    6. Galinsky, Nathan & Mishra, Amit & Zhang, Jia & Li, Fanxing, 2015. "Ca1−xAxMnO3 (A=Sr and Ba) perovskite based oxygen carriers for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 358-367.
    7. Galinsky, Nathan & Sendi, Marwan & Bowers, Lindsay & Li, Fanxing, 2016. "CaMn1−xBxO3−δ (B=Al, V, Fe, Co, and Ni) perovskite based oxygen carriers for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 80-87.
    8. Chang, F.C. & Liao, P.H. & Tsai, C.K. & Hsiao, M.C. & Paul Wang, H., 2014. "Chemical-looping combustion of syngas with nano CuO–NiO on chabazite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1731-1736.
    9. Huang, Liang & Tang, Mingchen & Fan, Maohong & Cheng, Hansong, 2015. "Density functional theory study on the reaction between hematite and methane during chemical looping process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 132-144.
    10. Chen, Liangyong & Bao, Jinhua & Kong, Liang & Combs, Megan & Nikolic, Heather S. & Fan, Zhen & Liu, Kunlei, 2016. "The direct solid-solid reaction between coal char and iron-based oxygen carrier and its contribution to solid-fueled chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 9-18.
    11. Fan, Yuyang & Tippayawong, Nakorn & Wei, Guoqiang & Huang, Zhen & Zhao, Kun & Jiang, Liqun & Zheng, Anqing & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin, 2020. "Minimizing tar formation whilst enhancing syngas production by integrating biomass torrefaction pretreatment with chemical looping gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    13. Xiaosong Zhang & Sheng Li & Hongguang Jin, 2014. "A Polygeneration System Based on Multi-Input Chemical Looping Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Shah, Vedant & Cheng, Zhuo & Baser, Deven S. & Fan, Jonathan A. & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2021. "Highly Selective Production of Syngas from Chemical Looping Reforming of Methane with CO2 Utilization on MgO-supported Calcium Ferrite Redox Materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    15. Akbari-Emadabadi, S. & Rahimpour, M.R. & Hafizi, A. & Keshavarz, P., 2017. "Production of hydrogen-rich syngas using Zr modified Ca-Co bifunctional catalyst-sorbent in chemical looping steam methane reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 51-62.
    16. Abad, A. & Pérez-Vega, R. & de Diego, L.F. & Gayán, P. & Izquierdo, M.T. & García-Labiano, F. & Adánez, J., 2019. "Thermochemical assessment of chemical looping assisted by oxygen uncoupling with a MnFe-based oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Xiang, Dong & Jin, Tong & Lei, Xinru & Liu, Shuai & Jiang, Yong & Dong, Zhongbing & Tao, Quanbao & Cao, Yan, 2018. "The high efficient synthesis of natural gas from a joint-feedstock of coke-oven gas and pulverized coke via a chemical looping combustion scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 944-954.
    18. Hu, Wenting & Donat, Felix & Scott, S.A. & Dennis, J.S., 2016. "Kinetics of oxygen uncoupling of a copper based oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 92-100.
    19. Voitic, Gernot & Nestl, Stephan & Lammer, Michael & Wagner, Julian & Hacker, Viktor, 2015. "Pressurized hydrogen production by fixed-bed chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 399-407.
    20. Henrik Leion & Volkmar Frick & Fredrik Hildor, 2018. "Experimental Method and Setup for Laboratory Fluidized Bed Reactor Testing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:151:y:2015:i:c:p:143-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.