IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v192y2024ics1364032123010626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy demand distribution and environmental impact assessment of chitosan production from shrimp shells

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente, Filipa A.
  • Hren, Robert
  • Novak, Uroš
  • Čuček, Lidija
  • Likozar, Blaž
  • Vujanović, Annamaria

Abstract

Step towards resilience and sustainability through exploring renewable biomass and waste streams to produce higher-added value products and energy is among key aspects for closing the loops, saving resources, and reducing the resource and emission footprints. In that respective, crustacean shells waste can offer rich spectre of valuable compounds such as proteins, chitin, carotenoids. This waste is produced in large quantities worldwide, thus allowing for commercial valorisation. An overview of technologies is undertaken for more sustainable and environmentally friendly chitosan production via chitin isolation and conversion and compared to the conventional processes. Furthermore, an assessment of the environmental burden and energy demand distribution for conventional and more sustainable alternative processes was performed, based on lab-scale experimental data. Three different chitin extraction routes and three distinct chitosan conversion processes were considered and compared for their greenhouse gas footprint, abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication and other potentials. Finally, the energy demand distribution was analysed considering electricity production patterns from three European countries, Slovenia, Portugal and Norway. The results showed that alternatives 3-A and 3-B (conventional eco-solvents - conventional deacetylation with 40 % and 50 % NaOH) generate the lowest environmental burden (184 g CO2 eq./g chitosan). Electricity was the main hotspot of the processes, used either for extraction, plasma treatment or deacetylation. The sensitivity analysis proved that the Norwegian electricity mix has the lowest environmental impact (4.2 g CO2 eq./g chitosan). This study highlights the impact of blue biorefineries by transforming marine waste to valuable biopolymers such as chitin and chitosan.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente, Filipa A. & Hren, Robert & Novak, Uroš & Čuček, Lidija & Likozar, Blaž & Vujanović, Annamaria, 2024. "Energy demand distribution and environmental impact assessment of chitosan production from shrimp shells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s1364032123010626
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123010626
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ning Yan & Xi Chen, 2015. "Sustainability: Don't waste seafood waste," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7564), pages 155-157, August.
    2. Liu, Yang & Lyu, Yizheng & Tian, Jinping & Zhao, Jialing & Ye, Ning & Zhang, Yongming & Chen, Lujun, 2021. "Review of waste biorefinery development towards a circular economy: From the perspective of a life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Cai, Xin & Wang, Zhichao & Ye, Yueyuan & Wang, Duo & Zhang, Zhaoxia & Zheng, Zhifeng & Liu, Yunquan & Li, Shuirong, 2021. "Conversion of chitin biomass into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Varjani, Sunita & Wang, Yajing & Peng, Wanxi & Pan, Junting & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "Marine shell-based biorefinery: A sustainable solution for aquaculture waste valorization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 623-634.
    5. Yin, Zhihong & Chu, Ruoyu & Zhu, Liandong & Li, Shuangxi & Mo, Fan & Hu, Dan & Liu, Chenchen, 2021. "Application of chitosan-based flocculants to harvest microalgal biomass for biofuel production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Siddiqui, M.T.H. & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Mubarak, N.M. & Hossain, Nazia & Zavabeti, Ali & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Griffin, G.J. & Srinivasan, Madapusi, 2021. "Synthesis and optimization of chitosan supported magnetic carbon bio-nanocomposites and bio-oil production by solvothermal carbonization co-precipitation for advanced energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 587-599.
    7. Friederike Ziegler & Andreas Emanuelsson & John Lucas Eichelsheim & Anna Flysjö & Vaque Ndiaye & Mikkel Thrane, 2011. "Extended Life Cycle Assessment of Southern Pink Shrimp Products Originating in Senegalese Artisanal and Industrial Fisheries for Export to Europe," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(4), pages 527-538, August.
    8. Vance, C. & Sweeney, J. & Murphy, F., 2022. "Space, time, and sustainability: The status and future of life cycle assessment frameworks for novel biorefinery systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Kravanja, Zdravko & Čuček, Lidija, 2013. "Multi-objective optimisation for generating sustainable solutions considering total effects on the environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 67-80.
    10. Ruiz, Héctor A. & Rodríguez-Jasso, Rosa M. & Fernandes, Bruno D. & Vicente, António A. & Teixeira, José A., 2013. "Hydrothermal processing, as an alternative for upgrading agriculture residues and marine biomass according to the biorefinery concept: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 35-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Chai, Yu & Tian, Xin-Yu & Zheng, Xiao-Ping & Du, Ya-Peng & Zhang, Yu-Cang & Zheng, Yan-Zhen, 2024. "An effective approach for chitosan conversion to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by bio-based organic acid with ionic liquids additive," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Du, Ya-Peng & Tian, Xin-Yu & Zheng, Xiao-Ping & Chai, Yu & Zhang, Yu-Cang & Zheng, Yan-Zhen, 2024. "Efficient preparation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from cellulose via one-step combination of mechanical and chemical pre-treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    5. Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz, 2022. "Outflow from a Biogas Plant as a Medium for Microalgae Biomass Cultivation—Pilot Scale Study and Technical Concept of a Large-Scale Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Tuan Hoang, Anh & Viet Pham, Van, 2021. "2-Methylfuran (MF) as a potential biofuel: A thorough review on the production pathway from biomass, combustion progress, and application in engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    8. Tahir H. Seehar & Saqib S. Toor & Ayaz A. Shah & Thomas H. Pedersen & Lasse A. Rosendahl, 2020. "Biocrude Production from Wheat Straw at Sub and Supercritical Hydrothermal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Kouteu Nanssou, Paul Alain & Jiokap Nono, Yvette & Kapseu, César, 2016. "Pretreatment of cassava stems and peelings by thermohydrolysis to enhance hydrolysis yield of cellulose in bioethanol production process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 252-265.
    10. Corton, J. & Donnison, I.S. & Ross, A.B. & Lea-Langton, A.R. & Wachendorf, M. & Fraser, M.D., 2021. "Impact of vegetation type and pre-processing on product yields and properties following hydrothermal conversion of conservation biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Vasilakou, K. & Nimmegeers, P. & Billen, P. & Van Passel, S., 2023. "Geospatial environmental techno-economic assessment of pretreatment technologies for bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Cheila Almeida & Philippe Loubet & Tamíris Pacheco da Costa & Paula Quinteiro & Jara Laso & David Baptista de Sousa & Ronan Cooney & Sinead Mellett & Guido Sonnemann & Carlos José Rodríguez & Neil Row, 2022. "Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1961-1978, December.
    13. Bieber, Niclas & Ker, Jen Ho & Wang, Xiaonan & Triantafyllidis, Charalampos & van Dam, Koen H. & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M. & Shah, Nilay, 2018. "Sustainable planning of the energy-water-food nexus using decision making tools," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 584-607.
    14. da Silva, Francinaldo Leite & de Oliveira Campos, Alan & dos Santos, Davi Alves & Batista Magalhães, Emilianny Rafaely & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino, 2018. "Valorization of an agroextractive residue—Carnauba straw—for the production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 661-669.
    15. Cuevas, Manuel & Sánchez, Sebastián & García, Juan F. & Baeza, Jaime & Parra, Carolina & Freer, Juanita, 2015. "Enhanced ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated olive stones," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 839-847.
    16. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    17. Giacomo Fabbrizi & Tommaso Giannoni & Leonardo Lorenzi & Andrea Nicolini & Paola Iodice & Valentina Coccia & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Mattia Gelosia, 2022. "High Solid and Low Cellulase Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cardoon Stems Pretreated by Acidified γ-Valerolactone/Water Solution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, April.
    18. Dragan Pamučar & Ibrahim Badi & Korica Sanja & Radojko Obradović, 2018. "A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Varjani, Sunita & Wang, Yajing & Peng, Wanxi & Pan, Junting & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "Marine shell-based biorefinery: A sustainable solution for aquaculture waste valorization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 623-634.
    20. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s1364032123010626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.