IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v256y2021ics0378377421003413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnosis of winter-wheat water stress based on UAV-borne multispectral image texture and vegetation indices

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Yongcai
  • Lao, Congcong
  • Yang, Yalong
  • Zhang, Zhitao
  • Chen, Haiying
  • Chen, Yinwen
  • Chen, Junying
  • Ning, Jifeng
  • Yang, Ning

Abstract

Timely and accurate detection of crop water stress is vital for precision irrigation. Whether the accuracy of the prevailing diagnosis of crop water stress using vegetation indices (VIs) and spectral reflectance can be improved still remains to be investigated. The crop surface characteristics such as grayscale or color vary under different water stress, so in this study one more variable, image texture, was utilized together to diagnose water stress. For this end, the canopy image of winter wheat in bloom was obtained by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with multispectral sensor, and the effect of soil background was eliminated using vegetation index threshold method. On this basis, Grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) was used to calculate the mean (MEA), variance (VAR), homogeneity (HOM), contrast (CON), dissimilarity (DIS), entropy (ENT), second moment (SEC) and correlation (COR) of the image texture under different spatial resolutions (0.008 m, 0.01 m, 0.02 m, 0.05 m, 0.1 m and 0.2 m). Next, the canopy vegetation indices were obtained by mathematical transformation of canopy reflectance, and then sensitive image texture and vegetation indices by full subset regression method. Finally, Cubist, BPNN (Back Propagation Neural Network) and ELM (Extreme Learning Machine) methods were adopted to build the estimation models of the stomatal conductance (Gs) of winter wheat (between the sensitive image texture and Gs, and between vegetation index and Gs), and the water stress map was plotted based on the optimal Gs estimation model. The result showed: (i) the image texture obtained from the high-resolution multispectral image had a high correlation with Gs, and the image texture (VAR, HOM, CON, DIS, ENT and SEC) at 550 nm had the most significant correlation; (ii) the higher the ground resolution, the higher the correlation between the Gs and the image texture, the vegetation indices, respectively. The image texture with a ground resolution of 0.008 m combined with VIs and Gs had the highest correlation, and combining image texture and vegetation index can significantly improve the estimation accuracy of winter wheat Gs; (iii) Among the three estimation models, the BPNN model constructed by combining the image texture and VIs (MEA, VAR, ENT, DWSI and EXG) had the best estimation performance (Calibration:Rc2 = 0.899, RMSEc = 0.01, MAEc = 0.006; Validation:Rc2 = 0.834, RMSEv =;0.018, MAEv = 0.014), and an accurate estimation could even be achieved at a lower Gs value. Compared with the BPNN model solely based on VIs or image texture, the Rc2 of the BPNN model based on the combined variables increased by 24% and 22.48%, respectively. Therefore, combining UAV multispectral image texture and VIs to estimate Gs provides a feasible and accurate method for water stress diagnosis of winter wheat.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Yongcai & Lao, Congcong & Yang, Yalong & Zhang, Zhitao & Chen, Haiying & Chen, Yinwen & Chen, Junying & Ning, Jifeng & Yang, Ning, 2021. "Diagnosis of winter-wheat water stress based on UAV-borne multispectral image texture and vegetation indices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:256:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421003413
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421003413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. J. Brown & M. Vannucci & T. Fearn, 2002. "Bayes model averaging with selection of regressors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 519-536, August.
    2. Cai, Fu & Zhang, Yushu & Mi, Na & Ming, Huiqing & Zhang, Shujie & Zhang, Hui & Zhao, Xianli, 2020. "Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Gago, J. & Douthe, C. & Coopman, R.E. & Gallego, P.P. & Ribas-Carbo, M. & Flexas, J. & Escalona, J. & Medrano, H., 2015. "UAVs challenge to assess water stress for sustainable agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 9-19.
    4. Ezenne, G.I. & Jupp, Louise & Mantel, S.K. & Tanner, J.L., 2019. "Current and potential capabilities of UAS for crop water productivity in precision agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 158-164.
    5. Carpintero, E. & Mateos, L. & Andreu, A. & González-Dugo, M.P., 2020. "Effect of the differences in spectral response of Mediterranean tree canopies on the estimation of evapotranspiration using vegetation index-based crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aliloo, Jamileh & Abbasi, Enayat & Karamidehkordi, Esmail & Ghanbari Parmehr, Ebadat & Canavari, Maurizio, 2024. "Dos and Don'ts of using drone technology in the crop fields," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Wang, Jingjing & Lou, Yu & Wang, Wentao & Liu, Suyi & Zhang, Haohui & Hui, Xin & Wang, Yunling & Yan, Haijun & Maes, Wouter H., 2024. "A robust model for diagnosing water stress of winter wheat by combining UAV multispectral and thermal remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Lili Zhou & Chenwei Nie & Tao Su & Xiaobin Xu & Yang Song & Dameng Yin & Shuaibing Liu & Yadong Liu & Yi Bai & Xiao Jia & Xiuliang Jin, 2023. "Evaluating the Canopy Chlorophyll Density of Maize at the Whole Growth Stage Based on Multi-Scale UAV Image Feature Fusion and Machine Learning Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Wang, Chu & Zhu, Kai & Bai, YanYan & Li, ChenYan & Li, Maona & Sun, Yan, 2024. "Response of stomatal conductance to plant water stress in buffalograss seed production: Observation with UAV thermal infrared imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grados, D. & Reynarfaje, X. & Schrevens, E., 2020. "A methodological approach to assess canopy NDVI–based tomato dynamics under irrigation treatments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Wang, Jingjing & Lou, Yu & Wang, Wentao & Liu, Suyi & Zhang, Haohui & Hui, Xin & Wang, Yunling & Yan, Haijun & Maes, Wouter H., 2024. "A robust model for diagnosing water stress of winter wheat by combining UAV multispectral and thermal remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Nadia Belmonte & Carlo Luetto & Stefano Staulo & Paola Rizzi & Marcello Baricco, 2017. "Case Studies of Energy Storage with Fuel Cells and Batteries for Stationary and Mobile Applications," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Deng, Juntao & Pan, Shijia & Zhou, Mingu & Gao, Wen & Yan, Yuncai & Niu, Zijie & Han, Wenting, 2023. "Optimum sampling window size and vegetation index selection for low-altitude multispectral estimation of root soil moisture content for Xuxiang Kiwifruit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Ander Wilson & Brian J. Reich, 2014. "Confounder selection via penalized credible regions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 852-861, December.
    6. Padilla-Díaz, C.M. & Rodriguez-Dominguez, C.M. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Perez-Martin, A. & Fernandes, R.D.M. & Montero, A. & García, J.M. & Fernández, J.E., 2018. "Water status, gas exchange and crop performance in a super high density olive orchard under deficit irrigation scheduled from leaf turgor measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 241-252.
    7. Alfredo Valdes Ramos & Elsa N. Aguilera Gonzalez & Gloria Tobón Echeverri & Luis Samaniego Moreno & Lourdes Díaz Jiménez & Salvador Carlos Hernández, 2019. "Potential Uses of Treated Municipal Wastewater in a Semiarid Region of Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Naijun Sha & Marina Vannucci & Mahlet G. Tadesse & Philip J. Brown & Ilaria Dragoni & Nick Davies & Tracy C. Roberts & Andrea Contestabile & Mike Salmon & Chris Buckley & Francesco Falciani, 2004. "Bayesian Variable Selection in Multinomial Probit Models to Identify Molecular Signatures of Disease Stage," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 812-819, September.
    9. Theo S. Eicher & Chris Papageorgiou & Adrian E. Raftery, 2011. "Default priors and predictive performance in Bayesian model averaging, with application to growth determinants," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 30-55, January/F.
    10. Clive J Hoggart & John C Whittaker & Maria De Iorio & David J Balding, 2008. "Simultaneous Analysis of All SNPs in Genome-Wide and Re-Sequencing Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-8, July.
    11. Dimitris Korobilis, 2008. "Forecasting in vector autoregressions with many predictors," Advances in Econometrics, in: Bayesian Econometrics, pages 403-431, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    12. Luxon Nhamo & James Magidi & Adolph Nyamugama & Alistair D. Clulow & Mbulisi Sibanda & Vimbayi G. P. Chimonyo & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2020. "Prospects of Improving Agricultural and Water Productivity through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Annalisa Cadonna & Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter & Peter Knaus, 2020. "Triple the Gamma—A Unifying Shrinkage Prior for Variance and Variable Selection in Sparse State Space and TVP Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, May.
    14. Hwanjo Chung & Seunghwan Wi & Byoung-Kwan Cho & Hoonsoo Lee, 2024. "Classification of Garlic ( Allium sativum L.) Crops by Fertilizer Differences Using Ground-Based Hyperspectral Imaging System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Salgado, Ramiro & Mateos, Luciano, 2021. "Evaluation of different methods of estimating ET for the performance assessment of irrigation schemes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Fullana-Pericàs, Mateu & Conesa, Miquel À. & Gago, Jorge & Ribas-Carbó, Miquel & Galmés, Jeroni, 2022. "High-throughput phenotyping of a large tomato collection under water deficit: Combining UAVs’ remote sensing with conventional leaf-level physiologic and agronomic measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Andrés Ramírez-Hassan, 2020. "Dynamic variable selection in dynamic logistic regression: an application to Internet subscription," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 909-932, August.
    18. Haowen Bao & Zongwu Cai & Yuying Sun & Shouyang Wang, 2023. "Penalized Model Averaging for High Dimensional Quantile Regressions," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202302, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2023.
    19. Naijun Sha & Benard Owusu Dechi, 2019. "A Bayes Inference for Ordinal Response with Latent Variable Approach," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, June.
    20. Romero-Trigueros, Cristina & Nortes, Pedro A. & Alarcón, Juan J. & Hunink, Johannes E. & Parra, Margarita & Contreras, Sergio & Droogers, Peter & Nicolás, Emilio, 2017. "Effects of saline reclaimed waters and deficit irrigation on Citrus physiology assessed by UAV remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 60-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:256:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421003413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.