IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v298y2024ics037837742400218x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SWAP 50 years: Advances in modelling soil-water-atmosphere-plant interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Heinen, Marius
  • Mulder, Martin
  • van Dam, Jos
  • Bartholomeus, Ruud
  • de Jong van Lier, Quirijn
  • de Wit, Janine
  • de Wit, Allard
  • Hack - ten Broeke, Mirjam

Abstract

This paper highlights the evolution and impact of the SWAP model (Soil – Water – Atmosphere – Plant), which was initiated by R.A. Feddes and colleagues fifty years ago, in 1974. Since then, the SWAP model has played a crucial role in the advancement of agrohydrology. This paper highlights some major advances that have been made, especially focussing on the last fifteen years. The domain of the SWAP model deals with the simulation of the soil water balance in both unsaturated and saturated conditions. The model solves the Richards equation using the water retention and hydraulic conductivity functions as described by the Van Genuchten – Mualem equations. Bimodal extensions of the Van Genuchten - Mualem relationships have been implemented, as well as modifications near saturation and addressing hysteresis. An important sink term in the Richards equation is root water uptake. Crop development plays an important role in a robust simulation of root water uptake. That is why a link has been made with the dynamic crop growth model WOFOST. Instead of using a prescribed crop development, a distinction between potential and actual crop development is calculated by reducing the potential photosynthesis as a result of water or oxygen stress. Since the early days of SWAP, empirical and macroscopic concepts have been used to simulate root water uptake. Recently two process-based concepts of root water uptake and oxygen stress have also been implemented. Another important sink-source term in the Richards equation is the interaction with artificial drains. In SWAP, drainage can be simulated by either using prescribed or simulated drain heads and simulation of controlled drainage with subirrigation is possible. Finally, we briefly elaborate on three studies using SWAP: water stresses in agriculture in the Netherlands, regional water productivity in China, and controlled drainage with subirrigation. We finish discussing promising developments for the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinen, Marius & Mulder, Martin & van Dam, Jos & Bartholomeus, Ruud & de Jong van Lier, Quirijn & de Wit, Janine & de Wit, Allard & Hack - ten Broeke, Mirjam, 2024. "SWAP 50 years: Advances in modelling soil-water-atmosphere-plant interactions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:298:y:2024:i:c:s037837742400218x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742400218X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Pei & Ren, Li, 2023. "Evaluating the differences in irrigation methods for winter wheat under limited irrigation quotas in the water-food-economy nexus in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    2. Scott Jasechko & Zachary D. Sharp & John J. Gibson & S. Jean Birks & Yi Yi & Peter J. Fawcett, 2013. "Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7445), pages 347-350, April.
    3. Victor Meriguetti Pinto & Jos C. van Dam & Quirijn de Jong van Lier & Klaus Reichardt, 2019. "Intercropping Simulation Using the SWAP Model: Development of a 2×1D Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. de Wit, Allard & Boogaard, Hendrik & Fumagalli, Davide & Janssen, Sander & Knapen, Rob & van Kraalingen, Daniel & Supit, Iwan & van der Wijngaart, Raymond & van Diepen, Kees, 2019. "25 years of the WOFOST cropping systems model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 154-167.
    5. Jarvis, Nicholas & Larsbo, Mats & Lewan, Elisabet & Garré, Sarah, 2022. "Improved descriptions of soil hydrology in crop models: The elephant in the room?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Bonfante, A. & Sellami, M.H. & Abi Saab, M.T. & Albrizio, R. & Basile, A. & Fahed, S. & Giorio, P. & Langella, G. & Monaco, E. & Bouma, J., 2017. "The role of soils in the analysis of potential agricultural production: A case study in Lebanon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 67-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. dos Santos Vianna, Murilo & Metselaar, Klaas & de Jong van Lier, Quirijn & Gaiser, Thomas & Marin, Fábio Ricardo, 2024. "The importance of model structure and soil data detail on the simulations of crop growth and water use: A case study for sugarcane," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. dos Santos Vianna, Murilo & Metselaar, Klaas & de Jong van Lier, Quirijn & Gaiser, Thomas & Marin, Fábio Ricardo, 2024. "The importance of model structure and soil data detail on the simulations of crop growth and water use: A case study for sugarcane," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    2. Gilson Augusto Helfer & Jorge Luís Victoria Barbosa & Bruno Guilherme Martini & Ronaldo Bastos dos Santos & Adilson Ben da Costa, 2019. "Ubiquitous Computing in Precision Agriculture: A Systematic Review," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 11(4), December.
    3. Wu, Jie & Feng, Yu & Liang, Lili & He, Xinyue & Zeng, Zhenzhong, 2022. "Assessing evapotranspiration observed from ECOSTRESS using flux measurements in agroecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Lucash, Melissa S. & Marshall, Adrienne M. & Weiss, Shelby A. & McNabb, John W. & Nicolsky, Dmitry J. & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Link, Timothy E. & Vogel, Jason G. & Scheller, Robert M. & Abramoff, Ro, 2023. "Burning trees in frozen soil: Simulating fire, vegetation, soil, and hydrology in the boreal forests of Alaska," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    5. Shen Tan & Shengchao Qiao & Han Wang & Sheng Chang, 2024. "Predicting Wheat Potential Yield in China Based on Eco-Evolutionary Optimality Principles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Shi, Yinfang & Wang, Zhaoyang & Hou, Cheng & Zhang, Puhan, 2022. "Yield estimation of Lycium barbarum L. based on the WOFOST model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    7. Chen, Yuzhang & Chai, Shouxi & Tian, Huihui & Chai, Yuwei & Li, Yawei & Chang, Lei & Cheng, Hongbo, 2019. "Straw strips mulch on furrows improves water use efficiency and yield of potato in a rainfed semiarid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 142-151.
    8. Feng, Dingrui & Li, Guangyong & Wang, Dan & Wulazibieke, Mierguli & Cai, Mingkun & Kang, Jing & Yuan, Zicheng & Xu, Houcheng, 2022. "Evaluation of AquaCrop model performance under mulched drip irrigation for maize in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    9. Mary Ollenburger & Page Kyle & Xin Zhang, 2022. "Uncertainties in estimating global potential yields and their impacts for long-term modeling," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1177-1190, October.
    10. Melpomeni Nikou & Theodoros Mavromatis, 2023. "Demonstrating the Use of the Yield-Gap Concept on Crop Model Calibration in Data-Poor Regions: An Application to CERES-Wheat Crop Model in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Malmquist, Louise & Barron, Jennie, 2023. "Improving spatial resolution in soil and drainage data to combine natural and anthropogenic water functions at catchment scale in agricultural landscapes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Urszula Somorowska, 2022. "Changes in Terrestrial Evaporation across Poland over the Past Four Decades Dominated by Increases in Summer Months," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Batista, Fabiana de Souza & Duku, Confidence & Hein, Lars, 2023. "Deforestation-induced changes in rainfall decrease soybean-maize yields in Brazil," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    14. Gardner, A.S. & Gaston, K.J. & Maclean, I.M.D., 2021. "Combining qualitative and quantitative methodology to assess prospects for novel crops in a warming climate," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Jinmei Zhao & Benjamin Adu & Jingnan Wang & Yuhang Fan, 2024. "Assessing Shrub Patch Characteristics and Soil Nutrient Distribution Patterns of Four Typical Alpine Shrub Plants in the Eastern Qilian Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Di Wang, & Wang, Li, 2023. "Characteristics of soil evaporation at two stages of growth in apple orchards with different ages in a semi-humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Dhouib, M. & Zitouna-Chebbi, R. & Prévot, L. & Molénat, J. & Mekki, I. & Jacob, F., 2022. "Multicriteria evaluation of the AquaCrop crop model in a hilly rainfed Mediterranean agrosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Hamze, Mohamad & Cheviron, Bruno & Baghdadi, Nicolas & Lo, Madiop & Courault, Dominique & Zribi, Mehrez, 2023. "Detection of irrigation dates and amounts on maize plots from the integration of Sentinel-2 derived Leaf Area Index values in the Optirrig crop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Desheng Wang & Chengkun Wang & Lichao Xu & Tiecheng Bai & Guozheng Yang, 2022. "Simulating Growth and Evaluating the Regional Adaptability of Cotton Fields with Non-Film Mulching in Xinjiang," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Siatwiinda M. Siatwiinda & Iwan Supit & Bert van Hove & Olusegun Yerokun & Gerard H. Ros & Wim de Vries, 2021. "Climate change impacts on rainfed maize yields in Zambia under conventional and optimized crop management," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:298:y:2024:i:c:s037837742400218x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.