IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000475/014305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Análisis bibliométrico para la identificación de factores de innovación en la industria alimenticia

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Lorena Pineda Ospina

Abstract

El artículo que se presenta a continuación plantea el objetivo de identificar los principales factores de la innovación expuestos en la literatura especializada en la industria alimenticia. Para su desarrollo, se realizó un ejercicio bibliométrico orientado al análisis de artículos científicos en el sector. A partir de los resultados, se concluye que los principales factores para la innovación en la industria alimenticia se asocian a los canales de comunicación y la participación en el proceso productivo de los clientes, proveedores o instituciones públicas o privadas (como universidades o Centros de Investigación). De acuerdo con los vínculos creados entre los actores involucrados, se genera un intercambio de conocimiento o información relacionada, principalmente, con la calidad de vida, nutrición y eficiencia en la producción, impactando así el desarrollo de productos, cambios a la oferta existente o transformaciones de los procesos productivos. En esta perspectiva, la innovación en la industria se adscribe a la “Innovación abierta”, donde la “Coinnovación” y “Cocreación” son claves para la relación de intercambio, y participación, de los actores involucrados.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Lorena Pineda Ospina, 2015. "Análisis bibliométrico para la identificación de factores de innovación en la industria alimenticia," Revista Ad-Minister, Universidad EAFIT, issue 27, pages 95-126, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000475:014305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/administer/article/view/2867/2797
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhona Johnsen & Isaac K. Ngugi & Peter Erdelyi, 2010. "Relational capabilities for value co-creation and innovation in SMEs," Post-Print hal-00771149, HAL.
    2. Francis Narin & Dominic Olivastro & Kimberly A. Stevens, 1994. "Bibliometrics/Theory, Practice and Problems," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(1), pages 65-76, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Zárate-Rueda & Yolima Ivonne Beltrán-Villamizar & Daniella Murallas-Sánchez, 2021. "Social representations of socioenvironmental dynamics in extractive ecosystems and conservation practices with sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16428-16453, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, K. & Marinova, D., 2005. "Use of bibliometric modelling for policy making," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 177-187.
    2. Ghulam-Muhammad Shah & Farid Ahmad & Shailesh Panwar & Manbar S. Khadka & Ajaz Ali & Suman Bisht, 2019. "Ocimum Sanctum [ Tulsi ]—An Alternative Additional Livelihood Option for the Poor and Smallholder Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Xianwen Wang & Xi Zhang & Shenmeng Xu, 2011. "Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 761-770, September.
    4. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong & He, Gang, 2018. "Research status of nuclear power: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 90-96.
    5. Hasyim & Sahyar & Mahmud, 2017. "Isolating Mechanism as a Mean to Improve Performance of SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 594-612.
    6. Appiah, Gloria & Bonsu, Samuel K. & Sarpong, David, 2021. "The unpowered customer: Co-creation as tactics of the weak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 317-326.
    7. Hofmann, Peter & Keller, Robert & Urbach, Nils, 2019. "Inter-technology relationship networks: Arranging technologies through text mining," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 202-213.
    8. Meena Chavan & Renu Agarwal, 2016. "The Efficacy of Linkages for Relational Capability Building and Internationalization-Indian and Australian Mining Firms," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 15(1), pages 51-78, June.
    9. Gegužytė Gintarė & Bagdonienė Liudmila, 2021. "Value Co-Creation in Engineering Service Innovation: Resources and Capabilities Perspectives," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 91-123, December.
    10. Momeni, Abdolreza & Rost, Katja, 2016. "Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 16-29.
    11. Aris Tri Haryanto & Tulus Haryono & Hunik Sri Runing Sawitri, 2017. "Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Small Medium Enterprises Performance:The Mediating Role of Innovation," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 484-491.
    12. de Paulo, Alex Fabianne & Porto, Geciane Silveira, 2017. "Solar energy technologies and open innovation: A study based on bibliometric and social network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 228-238.
    13. Agustinus A. Toryanto & Hasyim, 2017. "Networking Quality and Trust in Professional Services," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 354-370.
    14. Jonathan Rösler & Tobias Söll & Louise Hancock & Thomas Friedli, 2021. "Value Co-Creation between Public Service Organizations and the Private Sector: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Cinzia Daraio, 2003. "Age effects in scientific productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(1), pages 49-90, September.
    16. Malik, Ashish & Sharma, Piyush & Kingshott, Russel & Laker, Benjamin, 2022. "Leveraging cultural and relational capabilities for business model innovation: The case of a digital media EMMNE," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 270-282.
    17. Szu-chia Lo, 2007. "Patent analysis of genetic engineering research in Japan, Korea and Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(1), pages 183-200, January.
    18. Handyanto Widjojo & Avanti Fontana & Gita Gayatri & Agus W. Soehadi, 2019. "Value Co-Creation For Marketing Innovation: Comparative Study In The Sme Community," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Matthews, Russell S. & Chalmers, Dominic M. & Fraser, Simon S., 2018. "The intersection of entrepreneurship and selling: An interdisciplinary review, framework, and future research agenda," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 691-719.
    20. Seyedghorban, Zahra & Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & LaPlaca, Peter, 2016. "Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2664-2677.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovación; Industria Alimenticia; Análisis Bibliométrico;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • Y10 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Data: Tables and Charts - - - Data: Tables and Charts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000475:014305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heiner Mercado Percia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaeafco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.