IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v63y2018i9id29-2018-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic differences in eggshell ultrastructural properties of Saudi native chicken breeds kept at high ambient temperatures

Author

Listed:
  • Moataz Fathi

    (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
    Department of Animal Production and Breeding, College of Agriculture and VeterinaryMedicine, Qassim University, Al-Mulida, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)

  • Tarek Ebeid

    (Department of Animal Production and Breeding, College of Agriculture and VeterinaryMedicine, Qassim University, Al-Mulida, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt)

  • Gamal Rayan

    (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt)

  • Salah El-Safty

    (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt)

  • Osama Abou-Emera

    (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
    Department of Animal Production and Breeding, College of Agriculture and VeterinaryMedicine, Qassim University, Al-Mulida, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Egg quality and eggshell ultrastructural properties of four Saudi native chicken breeds were compared to detect genetic differences. A total of 480 laying hens at 28 weeks of age, representing four Saudi native breeds of chicken (black, black-barred, gray, and brown) kept under hot environmental conditions (34 ± 1°C) were randomly assigned to the current experiment. Laying hens were housed in individual cages in an open-sided house during hot summer season. A total of 360 intact eggs were randomly collected (90 from each breed) for egg quality assessment. Eggshell samples were prepared to evaluate ultrastructural measurements using a scanning electron microscope. No significant variations between the breeds concerning egg weight, egg-shape index, yolk index, albumen (%), yolk (%), shell (%), and shell thickness traits were detected. Brown breed showed significantly higher Haugh units compared to the other breeds. Moreover, brown breed scored the best for eggshell breaking strength trait (the highest crack resistance), followed by gray, black, and black-barred breeds, respectively (P < 0.005). Total ultrastructural score for mammillary layer measurements was significantly higher in black-barred breed if compared with black, brown, and gray breeds. Gray, brown, and black Saudi native breeds had an outstanding eggshell ultrastructure and, in turn, stiffer and stronger eggshell comparable with black-barred counterpart under high ambient temperatures. At the national level, for cross-breeding and selection programs aimed at producing good quality table and hatching eggs the use of gray, brown, and black breeds can be recommended due to excellent ultrastructural properties of their eggshell.

Suggested Citation

  • Moataz Fathi & Tarek Ebeid & Gamal Rayan & Salah El-Safty & Osama Abou-Emera, 2018. "Genetic differences in eggshell ultrastructural properties of Saudi native chicken breeds kept at high ambient temperatures," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 363-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:63:y:2018:i:9:id:29-2018-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/29/2018-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2018-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2018-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/29/2018-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Ketta & E. Tůmová, 2016. "Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(7), pages 299-309.
    2. E. Tůmová & T. Ebeid, 2005. "Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 129-134.
    3. E. Tůmová & L. Zita & M. Hubený & M. Skřivan & Z. Ledvinka, 2007. "The effect of oviposition time and genotype on egg quality characteristics in egg type hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 26-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moataz Fathi & Ibrahim Al-Homidan & Gamal Rayan & Salah El-Safty & Tarek Ebeid & Osama Abou-Emera, 2019. "Laying performance, immune response and antioxidant properties of hens segregating for naked neck and frizzle genes under low ambient temperature," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(5), pages 216-225.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Ketta & Eva Tumova, 2018. "Eggshell characteristics and cuticle deposition in three laying hen genotypes housed in enriched cages and on litter," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 11-16.
    2. E. Tůmová & M. Englmaierová & Z. Ledvinka & V. Charvátová, 2011. "Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(11), pages 490-498.
    3. E. Tůmová & R.M. Gous, 2012. "Interaction between oviposition time, age, and environmental temperature and egg quality traits in laying hens and broiler breeders," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(12), pages 541-549.
    4. Eva Tůmová & Jana Vlčková & Darina Chodová, 2017. "Differences in oviposition and egg quality of various genotypes of laying hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(9), pages 377-383.
    5. M. Gumulka & E. Kapkowska & D. Maj, 2010. "Laying pattern parameters in broiler breeder hens and intrasequence changes in egg composition," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 428-435.
    6. E. Tůmová & R.M. Gous & N. Tyler, 2014. "Effect of hen age, environmental temperature, and oviposition time on egg shell quality and egg shell and serum mineral contents in laying and broiler breeder hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 435-443.
    7. M. Ketta & E. Tůmová, 2016. "Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(7), pages 299-309.
    8. E. Tůmová & M. Skřivan & M. Englmaierová & L. Zita, 2009. "The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 17-23.
    9. V. Pištěková & M. Hovorka & V. Večerek & E. Straková & P. Suchý, 2006. "The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(7), pages 318-325.
    10. Z. Ledvinka & L. Zita & M. Hubený & E. Tůmová & M. Tyller & P. Dobrovolný & M. Hruška, 2011. "Effect of genotype, age of hens and K/k allele on eggshell quality," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(5), pages 242-249.
    11. H. Arpášová & M. Halaj & P. Halaj, 2010. "Eggshell quality and calcium utilization in feed of hens in repeated laying cycles," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 66-74.
    12. Anna Musilova & Martina Lichovnikova & Lucie Kupcikova & Vojtech Anderle, 2017. "Effect of suboptimal levels of non-phytate phosphorus and exogenous phytase on precaecal digestibility of phosphorus and calcium in laying hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(11), pages 473-481.
    13. Ľ. Zemková & J. Simeonovová & M. Lichovníková & K. Somerlíková, 2007. "The effects of housing systems and age of hens on the weight and cholesterol concentration of the egg," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 110-115.
    14. Jana Vlčková & Eva Tůmová & Mohamed Ketta & Michaela Englmaierová & Darina Chodová, 2018. "Effect of housing system and age of laying hens on eggshell quality, microbial contamination, and penetration of microorganisms into eggs," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 51-60.
    15. M. Englmaierová & E. Tůmová & V. Charvátová & M. Skřivan, 2014. "Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(8), pages 345-352.
    16. Laura Aline Zanelatto de Souza & Heder José D'Avila Lima & Renata Aparecida Martins & Andrey Sávio de Almeida Assunção & Donaldo Antônio Nunes Junior & Willian Ferreira Silva & Felipe Gomes da Silva, 2019. "Egg yolk colour and retinol concentration of eggs from laying hens fed diets containing carrot and beetroot meal," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(9), pages 395-403.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:63:y:2018:i:9:id:29-2018-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.