IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v51y2006i7id3945-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system

Author

Listed:
  • V. Pištěková

    (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • M. Hovorka

    (Zoological Garden, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • V. Večerek

    (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • E. Straková

    (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • P. Suchý

    (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

At present the laying hen rearing is transformed into alternative housing systems which include a deep litter system. As for the poultry nutrition, the replacement of animal protein with vegetable protein in poultry feed is applied. Therefore, in an experiment we evaluated the quality of eggs from laying hens in the cage system as compared to the deep litter system with vegetable protein substituted for animal protein in their feed. 72 ISA Brown laying hens were placed into the experiment. 36 laying hens were kept in the deep litter system and 36 laying hens were kept in conventional cages for laying hens. For the period of 9 months, 36 eggs from the group in the deep litter system were examined, always at intervals of five weeks (i.e. 8 × 36 eggs) and so were 36 eggs from the group in the cage system (i.e. 8 × 36 eggs). We found out that in the deep litter system the mean egg weight was higher (P < 0.01), shell weight was lower (P < 0.01), egg albumen was higher (P < 0.01), yolk weight did not differ (P > 0.05), yolk cholesterol was higher (P < 0.01), yolk colour was darker (P < 0.05), shell strength did not differ (P > 0.05), all in comparison with the cage system of laying hen keeping. The results of the experiment show that where vegetable protein was substituted for animal protein in the nutrition of laying hens, there were differences in the quality of eggs from laying hens kept in the deep litter system and eggs from laying hens kept in the cage system.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Pištěková & M. Hovorka & V. Večerek & E. Straková & P. Suchý, 2006. "The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(7), pages 318-325.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:51:y:2006:i:7:id:3945-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/3945-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3945-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3945-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3945-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Suchý & E. Straková & B. Jarka & J. Thiemel & V. Večerek, 2004. "Differences between metabolic profiles of egg-type and meat-type hybrid hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(8), pages 323-328.
    2. E. Tůmová & T. Ebeid, 2005. "Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 129-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Ketta & Eva Tumova, 2018. "Eggshell characteristics and cuticle deposition in three laying hen genotypes housed in enriched cages and on litter," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 11-16.
    2. Guler Yenice & Ozgur Kaynar & Mustafa Ileriturk & Feryaz Hira & Armagan Hayirli, 2016. "Quality of eggs in different production systems," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 34(4), pages 370-376.
    3. M. Ketta & E. Tůmová, 2016. "Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(7), pages 299-309.
    4. M. Englmaierová & E. Tůmová & V. Charvátová & M. Skřivan, 2014. "Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(8), pages 345-352.
    5. E. Tůmová & M. Englmaierová & Z. Ledvinka & V. Charvátová, 2011. "Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(11), pages 490-498.
    6. E. Tůmová & M. Skřivan & M. Englmaierová & L. Zita, 2009. "The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 17-23.
    7. J. Baumgartner & Z. Končeková & J. Benková & D. Peškovičová & J. Simenovová & J. Csuka, 2008. "Changes in egg quality traits associated with long-term selection for lower yolk cholesterol content in Japanese quail," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 119-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. Tůmová & R.M. Gous & N. Tyler, 2014. "Effect of hen age, environmental temperature, and oviposition time on egg shell quality and egg shell and serum mineral contents in laying and broiler breeder hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 435-443.
    2. E. Tůmová & M. Englmaierová & Z. Ledvinka & V. Charvátová, 2011. "Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(11), pages 490-498.
    3. E. Tůmová & R.M. Gous, 2012. "Interaction between oviposition time, age, and environmental temperature and egg quality traits in laying hens and broiler breeders," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(12), pages 541-549.
    4. Moataz Fathi & Tarek Ebeid & Gamal Rayan & Salah El-Safty & Osama Abou-Emera, 2018. "Genetic differences in eggshell ultrastructural properties of Saudi native chicken breeds kept at high ambient temperatures," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 363-370.
    5. H. Arpášová & M. Halaj & P. Halaj, 2010. "Eggshell quality and calcium utilization in feed of hens in repeated laying cycles," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 66-74.
    6. Eva Tůmová & Jana Vlčková & Darina Chodová, 2017. "Differences in oviposition and egg quality of various genotypes of laying hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(9), pages 377-383.
    7. M. Gumulka & E. Kapkowska & D. Maj, 2010. "Laying pattern parameters in broiler breeder hens and intrasequence changes in egg composition," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 428-435.
    8. Ľ. Zemková & J. Simeonovová & M. Lichovníková & K. Somerlíková, 2007. "The effects of housing systems and age of hens on the weight and cholesterol concentration of the egg," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 110-115.
    9. M. Ketta & E. Tůmová, 2016. "Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(7), pages 299-309.
    10. J. Thiemel & P. Jelínek, 2004. "The effect of carnitine on hatching rate and metabolic profile of blood in breeding layers," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(12), pages 517-523.
    11. M. Englmaierová & E. Tůmová & V. Charvátová & M. Skřivan, 2014. "Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(8), pages 345-352.
    12. E. Tůmová & M. Skřivan & M. Englmaierová & L. Zita, 2009. "The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 17-23.
    13. Mohamed Ketta & Eva Tumova, 2018. "Eggshell characteristics and cuticle deposition in three laying hen genotypes housed in enriched cages and on litter," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 11-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:51:y:2006:i:7:id:3945-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.