IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v50y2005i3id4006-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system

Author

Listed:
  • E. Tůmová

    (Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • T. Ebeid

    (Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of the time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in two different housing systems (cages vs. litter). ISA brown hens from 20 to 64 weeks of age were housed in battery cages (550 cm2/hen, 19 526 laying hens in the house) and on deep litter (7 hen/m2, 4 652 laying hens in the house). In both houses, eggs were collected daily at three oviposition times 06:00, 10:00 and 14:00 h. Every four weeks, 90 eggs for each house (30 eggs for each oviposition time) were used for egg quality assessment. The results indicated that in cages the highest percentages (P ≤ 0.001) of normal (74.47%), non-standard (0.85%) and cracked (1.80%) eggs were laid in the early morning (06:00 h). On deep litter, however, the highest percentages (P ≤ 0.05) of normal sound eggs were produced at10:00 h (35.43%) and at14:00 h (33.03%). In the cage system, the heaviest eggs (63.01 g) were laid in the early morning (06:00 h) and the highest shell percentage (10.33%) was in eggs laid in the afternoon and also at 10:00 h (10.31%). On the other hand, in the litter housing system, the time of oviposition had no significant effect on egg weight and eggshell quality characteristics except for shell thickness. Morning eggs had greater shell thickness (0.398 mm) than afternoon eggs (0.390 mm). In cages and on litter, statistically significant differences in albumen height, albumen index and Haugh Units were observed between early morning eggs and afternoon eggs and data showed a pattern of relatively higher albumen quality for eggs collected in the afternoon in both systems.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Tůmová & T. Ebeid, 2005. "Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 129-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:50:y:2005:i:3:id:4006-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/4006-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4006-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4006-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/4006-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Ketta & Eva Tumova, 2018. "Eggshell characteristics and cuticle deposition in three laying hen genotypes housed in enriched cages and on litter," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 11-16.
    2. M. Gumulka & E. Kapkowska & D. Maj, 2010. "Laying pattern parameters in broiler breeder hens and intrasequence changes in egg composition," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 428-435.
    3. E. Tůmová & R.M. Gous & N. Tyler, 2014. "Effect of hen age, environmental temperature, and oviposition time on egg shell quality and egg shell and serum mineral contents in laying and broiler breeder hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 435-443.
    4. E. Tůmová & R.M. Gous, 2012. "Interaction between oviposition time, age, and environmental temperature and egg quality traits in laying hens and broiler breeders," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(12), pages 541-549.
    5. H. Arpášová & M. Halaj & P. Halaj, 2010. "Eggshell quality and calcium utilization in feed of hens in repeated laying cycles," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 66-74.
    6. M. Ketta & E. Tůmová, 2016. "Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(7), pages 299-309.
    7. Moataz Fathi & Tarek Ebeid & Gamal Rayan & Salah El-Safty & Osama Abou-Emera, 2018. "Genetic differences in eggshell ultrastructural properties of Saudi native chicken breeds kept at high ambient temperatures," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 363-370.
    8. Ľ. Zemková & J. Simeonovová & M. Lichovníková & K. Somerlíková, 2007. "The effects of housing systems and age of hens on the weight and cholesterol concentration of the egg," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 110-115.
    9. M. Englmaierová & E. Tůmová & V. Charvátová & M. Skřivan, 2014. "Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(8), pages 345-352.
    10. E. Tůmová & M. Englmaierová & Z. Ledvinka & V. Charvátová, 2011. "Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(11), pages 490-498.
    11. Eva Tůmová & Jana Vlčková & Darina Chodová, 2017. "Differences in oviposition and egg quality of various genotypes of laying hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(9), pages 377-383.
    12. V. Pištěková & M. Hovorka & V. Večerek & E. Straková & P. Suchý, 2006. "The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(7), pages 318-325.
    13. E. Tůmová & M. Skřivan & M. Englmaierová & L. Zita, 2009. "The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 17-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:50:y:2005:i:3:id:4006-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.