IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbcacn/v5y2014i2p33n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retrospective evaluation of costs associated with methyl bromide critical use exemptions for open field strawberries in California

Author

Listed:
  • Wolverton Ann

    (U.S. EPA, National Center for Environmental Economics, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, MC 1809T, Washington, D.C. 20460, USA)

Abstract

Methyl bromide (MBr) has been widely used as a fumigant to control pests in the agricultural sector, but it is also an ozone depleting substance. After 2005, methyl bromide could only be produced when a critical use exemption was agreed to by the signatories to the Montreal Protocol. This paper examines how the EPA’s ex ante cost analyses for open field fresh strawberries in California for the 2006–2010 seasons compare to an ex post assessment of costs. A key input into the ex ante cost analysis is the assumed yield loss associated with methyl bromide alternatives. The EPA used conservative assumptions given the wide range of estimates in the literature at the time, but it appears that a number of viable MBr alternatives – either new fumigants or new ways of applying existing fumigants – may have become available more quickly and resulted in lower yield loss than initially anticipated. Likewise, it appears that farmers who substituted away from methyl bromide did so without imposing large negative impacts on production in prime California strawberry growing areas. Ex post evaluation also confirms the effect of California regulatory restrictions in limiting the use of various economically competitive alternatives. It is worth noting that unanticipated complications after switching away from methyl bromide, such as new diseases, slowed the transition to MBr alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolverton Ann, 2014. "Retrospective evaluation of costs associated with methyl bromide critical use exemptions for open field strawberries in California," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 225-257, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:5:y:2014:i:2:p:33:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/jbca-2014-0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-0025
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbca-2014-0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferguson, Walter L. & Yee, Jet, 1997. "Phasing Out Registered Pesticide Uses as an Alternative to Total Bans: A Case Study of Methyl Bromide," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Rachael E. Goodhue & Steven A. Fennimore & Husein A. Ajwa, 2005. "The Economic Importance of Methyl Bromide: Does the California Strawberry Industry Qualify for a Critical Use Exemption from the Methyl Bromide Ban?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 198-211.
    3. Carter, Colin A. & Chalfant, James A. & Goodhue, Rachael E. & Groves, Kiara & Simon, Leo K., 2004. "Impacts Of Pesticide Regulation On The California Strawberry Industry," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20166, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. E. Melanie DuPuis & Brian J. Gareau, 2008. "Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1212-1229, December.
    5. Kopits, Elizabeth & McGartland, Al & Morgan, Cynthia & Pasurka, Carl & Shadbegian, Ron & Simon, Nathalie B. & Simpson, David & Wolverton, Ann, 2014. "Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 173-193, June.
    6. Rachael E. Goodhue & Steven A. Fennimore & Husein A. Ajwa, 2005. "The Economic Importance of Methyl Bromide: Does the California Strawberry Industry Qualify for a Critical Use Exemption from the Methyl Bromide Ban?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 198-211.
    7. Colin A. Carter & James A. Chalfant & Rachael E. Goodhue & Frank M. Han & Massimiliano DeSantis, 2005. "The Methyl Bromide Ban: Economic Impacts on the California Strawberry Industry," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 181-197.
    8. Brent Hueth & Bruce McWilliams & David Sunding & David Zilberman, 2000. "Analysis of an Emerging Market: Can Methyl Iodide Substitute for Methyl Bromide?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 43-54.
    9. VanSickle, John J. & Nalampang, Sikavas, 2002. "The Impact Of The Phase Out Of Methylbromide On The U.S. Vegetable Industry," Policy Briefs 15664, University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon, Daniel H. & Zirogiannis, Nikolaos & Hollingsworth, Alex, 2017. "Estimating Co-pollutant Benefits from Climate Change Policies in the Electricity Sector: An Empirical Approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259116, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Fraas, Arthur G. & Kopits, Elizabeth & Wolverton, Ann, 2021. "A Retrospective Review of Retrospective Cost Analyses," RFF Working Paper Series 21-29, Resources for the Future.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Gareau, 2010. "A critical review of the successful CFC phase-out versus the delayed methyl bromide phase-out in the Montreal Protocol," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 209-231, September.
    2. Ferrier, Peyton, 2010. "Irradiation as a quarantine treatment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 548-555, December.
    3. Suh, Dong Hee & Guan, Zhengfei & Khachatryan, Hayk, 2017. "The impact of Mexican competition on the U.S. strawberry industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), April.
    4. Brian J Gareau & E Melanie DuPuis, 2009. "From Public to Private Global Environmental Governance: Lessons from the Montreal Protocol's Stalled Methyl Bromide Phase-Out," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(10), pages 2305-2323, October.
    5. Lei, Lei, 2018. "Effects of trade policy on technological innovation in agricultural markets - implications for the developing economies," IDE Discussion Papers 687, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Kopits Elizabeth, 2014. "A retrospective assessment of the costs of EPA’s 1998 Locomotive Emission Standards," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 285-314, June.
    7. E. DuPuis & Sean Gillon, 2009. "Alternative modes of governance: organic as civic engagement," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(1), pages 43-56, March.
    8. Carpio, Carlos E. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2006. "A Structural Econometric Model of Consumer Demand at Pick-Your-Own Fruit Operations," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21372, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Ekardt, Felix, 2009. "Welthandelsrecht und Sozialstaatlichkeit: Globalisierung und soziale Ungleichheit," Arbeitspapiere 170, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    10. Morgan Cynthia & Simon Nathalie B., 2014. "National primary drinking water regulation for arsenic: A retrospective assessment of costs," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 259-284, June.
    11. Colin A. Carter & James A. Chalfant & Rachael E. Goodhue & Frank M. Han & Massimiliano DeSantis, 2005. "The Methyl Bromide Ban: Economic Impacts on the California Strawberry Industry," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 181-197.
    12. Hamilton, Lynn L., 2006. "California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops," Research Project Reports 121622, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    13. Cassey, Andrew J. & Galinato, Suzette P. & Taylor, Justin L., 2012. "Environmental Regulation and Regional Economy: Economic Impacts of the Elimination of Azinphos-methyl on the Apple Industry and Washington State," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 43(2), pages 1-22.
    14. Kimitaka Nishitani & Munehiko Itoh, 2014. "Product Innovation in Response to Environmental Standards and Competitive Advantage: A Hedonic Analysis of Refrigerators in the Japanese Retail Market," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-30, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    15. Brian Gareau, 2015. "Lessons from the Montreal Protocol delay in phasing out methyl bromide," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 163-168, June.
    16. Juliet Roper & Shiv Ganesh & Kerr Inkson, 2010. "Neoliberalism and knowledge interests in boundaryless careers discourse," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 24(4), pages 661-679, December.
    17. Morgan, Cynthia & Pasurka, Carl & Shadbegian, Ron & Belova, Anna & Casey, Brendan, 2023. "Estimating the cost of environmental regulations and technological change with limited information," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    18. Gingerich, Daniel B. & Zhao, Yifan & Mauter, Meagan S., 2019. "Environmentally significant shifts in trace element emissions from coal plants complying with the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1206-1215.
    19. Rachael E. Goodhue & Steven A. Fennimore & Husein A. Ajwa, 2005. "The Economic Importance of Methyl Bromide: Does the California Strawberry Industry Qualify for a Critical Use Exemption from the Methyl Bromide Ban?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 198-211.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:5:y:2014:i:2:p:33:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.