IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v35y1998i2p213-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leverage, Resistance and the Success of Implementation Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Paul C. Nutt

Abstract

The research reported in this paper explored the success of implementation approaches used by managers with differing amounts of leverage facing resistance from key stakeholders. The explanatory variables were implementation approach and resistance, measured by the extent of stakeholder support, scale and disruptiveness of the decision, as well as the implementing manager’s leverage. ‘Intervention’ was found to be the most successful approach, no matter what situation faced a manager seeking to implement a decision. Intervention proved to be a viable substitute for participation that has a favourable adoption rate and a dramatic increase in timeliness. Persuasion and edicts were often used and generally unsuccessful. More implementation success seems possible if other approaches are used. The findings indicate that the most successful approach, intervention, was not subject to situational influences. This questions the value of contingency frameworks that call for an implementation approach to be selected according to the demands of the situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul C. Nutt, 1998. "Leverage, Resistance and the Success of Implementation Approaches," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 213-240, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:2:p:213-240
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00091
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cees B. M. Van Riel & Guido Berens & Majorie Dijkstra, 2009. "Stimulating Strategically Aligned Behaviour Among Employees," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1197-1226, November.
    2. Raelin, Joseph A., 2012. "The manager as facilitator of dialogue," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(6), pages 818-839.
    3. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Orr, Kevin & Hughes, Jeffrey, 2023. "My colleagues (do not) think the same: Middle managers’ shared and separate realities in strategy implementation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Nutt, Paul C., 2005. "Search during decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 851-876, February.
    5. Albert Marouani, 2013. "The Management Of Strategic Change In Public Organisations In The Light Of The Experience Of Autonomy Of French Universities: An Attempt At Critical Appraisal [Le management du changement stratégiq," Post-Print hal-02108163, HAL.
    6. Paul C. Nutt, 2008. "Investigating the Success of Decision Making Processes," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 425-455, March.
    7. Albert Marouani, 2013. "La gestion du changement stratégique dans les organisations publiques à la lumière de l'expérience d'autonomie des universités françaises: un essai d'appréciation critique," Post-Print halshs-01964577, HAL.
    8. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2021. "Strategy implementation: A review and an introductory framework," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 22-33.
    9. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon & Elif Genc, 2017. "Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Mohammed Belkasseh & Morad Lemtaoui, 2015. "Let'S Talk Performance Some Hints," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(3), pages 57-70.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:2:p:213-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.