IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v56y2022i4p1454-1474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of response efficacy and risk aversion in promoting compliance during crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica L. Thomas
  • Hooman Mirahmad
  • Grace Kemper

Abstract

This research examines consumers' compliance with behaviors that focus on preventing the spread of COVID‐19. Drawing on Protection Motivation Theory and research on efficacy, we find that, during a pandemic, consumers who have higher perceptions of response efficacy are less likely to engage in risky consumption behaviors (Study 1) and more likely to engage in protective consumption behaviors (Study 2). This effect is moderated by risk aversion, such that as risk aversion increases, COVID‐compliant behaviors increase even when consumers do not believe in their ability to effectuate change. Further, the relationship between response efficacy and COVID‐compliant behaviors is mediated by anticipated guilt. Importantly, these constructs are relevant beyond the COVID‐19 pandemic. As situations like drought, rising sea levels, and infectious diseases persist, consumers will continually be asked to sacrifice for their own wellbeing and the wellbeing of others. Thus, we discuss implications for policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica L. Thomas & Hooman Mirahmad & Grace Kemper, 2022. "The role of response efficacy and risk aversion in promoting compliance during crisis," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 1454-1474, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:4:p:1454-1474
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12464
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Steenhaut & Patrick Kenhove, 2006. "The Mediating Role of Anticipated Guilt in Consumers’ Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 269-288, December.
    2. Verena M. Wottrich & Eva A. van Reijmersdal & Edith G. Smit, 2019. "App Users Unwittingly in the Spotlight: A Model of Privacy Protection in Mobile Apps," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1056-1083, September.
    3. Xiao Wang, 2017. "Risk perceptions, moral attitudes, and anticipated guilt in US consumers’ climate change behavioral intentions," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(12), pages 1554-1567, December.
    4. Punam A. Keller, 2006. "Regulatory Focus and Efficacy of Health Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 109-114, June.
    5. Kimberly A. Whitler & Ali Besharat & Saim Kashmiri, 2021. "Exogenous brand crises: brand infection and contamination," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 129-133, March.
    6. Small, Deborah A. & Loewenstein, George & Slovic, Paul, 2007. "Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 143-153, March.
    7. Marie A. Yeh & Ann M. Mirabito & Stacey R. Finkelstein, 2021. "Physical risk messaging enhances favorable attitudes toward mask wearing," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1682-1690, December.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:397-406 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Audrey Light & Taehyun Ahn, 2010. "Divorce as risky behavior," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(4), pages 895-921, November.
    10. S. Steenhaut & P. Van Kenhove, 2006. "The Mediating Role of Anticipated Guilt in Consumers’ Ethical Decision-Making," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/370, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    11. Julie V. Stanton & Deirdre T. Guion, 2013. "Taking Advantage of a Vulnerable Group? Emotional Cues in Ads Targeting Parents," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 485-517, November.
    12. Nhat Quang Le & Magne Supphellen & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2021. "Effects of negative social information on the willingness to support charities: the moderating role of regulatory focus," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 111-122, March.
    13. Kate E. Jones & Nikkita G. Patel & Marc A. Levy & Adam Storeygard & Deborah Balk & John L. Gittleman & Peter Daszak, 2008. "Global trends in emerging infectious diseases," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7181), pages 990-993, February.
    14. Pantano, Eleonora & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Devereux, Luke & Pizzi, Gabriele, 2021. "Tweets to escape: Intercultural differences in consumer expectations and risk behavior during the COVID-19 lockdown in three European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 59-69.
    15. Touré-Tillery, Maferima & Light, Alysson E., 2018. "No self to spare: How the cognitive structure of the self influences moral behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 48-64.
    16. Elizabeth A. Minton & Frank G. Cabano, 2021. "Religiosity’s influence on stability-seeking consumption during times of great uncertainty: the case of the coronavirus pandemic," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 135-148, June.
    17. Ingo Balderjahn & Michael S.W. Lee & Barbara Seegebarth & Mathias Peyer, 2020. "A Sustainable Pathway to Consumer Wellbeing. The Role of Anticonsumption and Consumer Empowerment," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 456-488, June.
    18. Antonetti, Paolo & Baines, Paul & Jain, Shailendra, 2018. "The persuasiveness of guilt appeals over time: Pathways to delayed compliance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 14-25.
    19. Felix Septianto & Widya Paramita, 2021. "Sad but smiling? How the combination of happy victim images and sad message appeals increase prosocial behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 91-110, March.
    20. Margaret C Campbell & J Jeffrey Inman & Amna Kirmani & Linda L Price, 2020. "In Times of Trouble: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Responses to Threats," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 311-326.
    21. van Esch, Patrick & Cui, Yuanyuan (Gina) & Jain, Shailendra Pratap, 2021. "The effect of political ideology and message frame on donation intent during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 201-213.
    22. DaHee Han & Adam Duhachek & Nidhi Agrawal, 2016. "Coping and Construal Level Matching Drives Health Message Effectiveness viaResponse Efficacy or Self-Efficacy Enhancement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 429-447.
    23. A. Smajgl & T. Q. Toan & D. K. Nhan & J. Ward & N. H. Trung & L. Q. Tri & V. P. D. Tri & P. T. Vu, 2015. "Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 167-174, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Crapa & Maria Elena Latino & Paolo Roma, 2024. "The performance of green communication across social media: Evidence from large‐scale retail industry in Italy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 493-513, January.
    2. Michael G. Luchs & Minu Kumar, 2017. "“Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 567-584, February.
    3. Onwezen, Marleen C. & Antonides, Gerrit & Bartels, Jos, 2013. "The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 141-153.
    4. Jana Eßer & Manuel Frondel & Stephan Sommer, 2023. "Soziale Normen und der Emissionsausgleich bei Flügen: Evidenz für deutsche Haushalte [Social Norms and Flight Emission Offsets: Evidence for German Households]," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 17(1), pages 71-99, March.
    5. Ola Altabbaa & Muge Ors, 2019. "Factors affect Canadian Women Purchase Intention in Green Cosmetics in the Frame of Moral Obligation, Green Trust, Self-Identity, Health, Social Value, and Satisfaction," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(5), pages 42-58.
    6. Tang, Honghong & Li, Lin & Su, Song, 2022. "Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-148.
    7. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    8. Mishra, Sita & Shukla, Yupal & Malhotra, Gunjan & Arora, Vibha, 2023. "Investigating the impact of consumers’ patriotism and ethnocentrism on purchase intention: Moderating role of consumer guilt and animosity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    9. Cosmina Bradu & Jacob Orquin & John Thøgersen, 2014. "The Mediated Influence of a Traceability Label on Consumer’s Willingness to Buy the Labelled Product," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 283-295, October.
    10. Malhotra, Gunjan & Ramalingam, Mahesh, 2022. "Does impact of campaign and consumer guilt help in exploring the role of national identity and purchase decisions of consumers?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Nitika Sharma & Arminda Paço & Raysa Geaquinto Rocha & Maria Palazzo & Alfonso Siano, 2024. "Examining a theoretical model of eco‐anxiety on consumers' intentions towards green products," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1868-1885, May.
    12. Ahsan Habib & Md Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2017. "Determinants of monetary penalties for environmental violations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 754-775, September.
    13. Volker Lingnau & Florian Fuchs & Till E. Dehne-Niemann, 2017. "The influence of psychopathic traits on the acceptance of white-collar crime: do corporate psychopaths cook the books and misuse the news?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(9), pages 1193-1227, December.
    14. Scott J. Vitell & Robert Allen King & Jatinder Jit Singh, 2013. "A special emphasis and look at the emotional side of ethical decision-making," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(2), pages 74-85, June.
    15. Mills, Paul & Groening, Christopher, 2021. "The role of social acceptability and guilt in unethical consumer behavior: Following the crowd or their own moral compass?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 377-388.
    16. Lisa A Williams & Barbara Masser & Jessie Sun, 2015. "Revisiting the Effect of Anthropomorphizing a Social Cause Campaign," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Tejaswi Patil & Zillur Rahman, 2023. "A bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on guilt in marketing," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1385-1415, September.
    18. Yanyan Chen & Dirk C. Moosmayer, 2020. "When Guilt is Not Enough: Interdependent Self-Construal as Moderator of the Relationship Between Guilt and Ethical Consumption in a Confucian Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 551-572, January.
    19. Jatinder J. Singh & Nitika Garg & Rahul Govind & Scott J. Vitell, 2018. "Anger Strays, Fear Refrains: The Differential Effect of Negative Emotions on Consumers’ Ethical Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 235-248, August.
    20. Joëlle Vanhamme & Adam Lindgreen & Gülen Sarial-Abi, 2023. "Luxury Ethical Consumers: Who Are They?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 805-838, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:4:p:1454-1474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.