IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v55y2021i4p1682-1690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical risk messaging enhances favorable attitudes toward mask wearing

Author

Listed:
  • Marie A. Yeh
  • Ann M. Mirabito
  • Stacey R. Finkelstein

Abstract

While masks slow the transmission of COVID‐19, many resist wearing them. Extant public service messaging focuses on creating social norms around mask wearing. Drawing on protection motivation theory, we conduct a copy test to determine whether focusing on the physical risks or focusing on the social risks of contracting COVID‐19 is more persuasive in motivating mask wearing. We find that physical risk messaging is more persuasive than social risk messaging and find that the effect is partially mediated by fear of COVID‐19. The mediation is moderated by germ aversion. Specifically, we find people who are high in germ aversion respond to both physical and social risk messaging. However, people low in germ aversion respond only to physical risk messaging—and these are the people who are less likely to wear masks. Our findings offer public health agencies a fresh approach for encouraging those who are resistant to mask wearing to wear a mask.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie A. Yeh & Ann M. Mirabito & Stacey R. Finkelstein, 2021. "Physical risk messaging enhances favorable attitudes toward mask wearing," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1682-1690, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:55:y:2021:i:4:p:1682-1690
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sternthal, Brian & Craig, C Samuel, 1974. "Fear Appeals: Revisited and Revised," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(3), pages 22-34, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fu, Shixuan & Zheng, Xiaojiang & Wang, Hongpeng & Luo, Yunzhong, 2023. "Fear appeals and coping appeals for health product promotion: Impulsive purchasing or psychological distancing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Veronica L. Thomas & Hooman Mirahmad & Grace Kemper, 2022. "The role of response efficacy and risk aversion in promoting compliance during crisis," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 1454-1474, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Scopelliti & Maria Giuseppina Pacilli & Antonio Aquino, 2021. "TV News and COVID-19: Media Influence on Healthy Behavior in Public Spaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Christopher L. Cummings & Sonny Rosenthal & Wei Yi Kong, 2021. "Secondary Risk Theory: Validation of a Novel Model of Protection Motivation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 204-220, January.
    3. Heribert Gierl & Roland Helm & Michaela Satzinger, 2000. "Die Wirkung positiver und negativer Aussagen in der Werbung vor dem Hintergrund des Message Framing," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 234-256, May.
    4. Bartikowski, Boris & Laroche, Michel & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2019. "A content analysis of fear appeal advertising in Canada, China, and France," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 232-239.
    5. Ioannis Kareklas & Darrel D. Muehling, 2014. "Addressing the Texting and Driving Epidemic: Mortality Salience Priming Effects on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 223-250, June.
    6. Cotte, June & Coulter, Robin A. & Moore, Melissa, 2005. "Enhancing or disrupting guilt: the role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 361-368, March.
    7. Key, Thomas Martin & Czaplewski, Andrew J., 2017. "Upstream social marketing strategy: An integrated marketing communications approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 325-333.
    8. Kirk Kristofferson & Michelle E. Daniels & Andrea C. Morales, 2022. "Using virtual reality to increase charitable donations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 75-87, March.
    9. Scholten, Marc, 1996. "Lost and found: The information-processing model of advertising effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 97-104, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:55:y:2021:i:4:p:1682-1690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.