IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v30y2023i4p1317-1333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Femme‐toring: Leveraging critical femininities and femme theory to cultivate alternative approaches to mentoring

Author

Listed:
  • Rhea Ashley Hoskin
  • Lilith A. Whiley

Abstract

Both traditional and new‐wave mentoring (or men‐toring), intentionally or unintentionally, maintain and reproduce neoliberal toxic masculinist norms in academia. By applying femme theory and critical femininities frameworks, we expose how men‐toring is exclusionary and assimilationist. We then queer and feminize mentoring, developing femme‐toring as an alternative reformist approach rooted in fem(me)inist epistemologies and ethics of care, in particular, softness, vulnerability, collaboration, and yielding. Leveraging systems theory and Foucauldian theory, we contend that by centering femininity in these ways, femme‐toring unsettles toxic masculinist norms and offers possibilities for a more inclusive academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhea Ashley Hoskin & Lilith A. Whiley, 2023. "Femme‐toring: Leveraging critical femininities and femme theory to cultivate alternative approaches to mentoring," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1317-1333, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1317-1333
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12984
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amal Abdellatif, 2021. "Marginalized to double marginalized: My mutational intersectionality between the East and the West," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S1), pages 58-65, January.
    2. Agnès Vayreda & Ester Conesa & Beatriz Revelles‐Benavente & Ana M. González Ramos, 2019. "Subjectivation processes and gender in a neoliberal model of science in three Spanish research centres," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 430-447, May.
    3. Lara Pecis & Vincenza Priola, 2019. "The ‘new industrial man’ as unhero: Doing postfeminist masculinities in an Italian pharmacological research centre," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(10), pages 1413-1432, October.
    4. Georgina Santos & Stéphanie Dang Van Phu, 2019. "Gender and Academic Rank in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-46, June.
    5. Kim, Lanu & Smith, Daniel Scott & Hofstra, Bas & McFarland, Daniel A., 2022. "Gendered knowledge in fields and academic careers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    6. Jette Sandager, 2021. "Mentoring as affective governmentality: Shame, (un)happiness, and the (re)production of masculine leadership," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1304-1322, July.
    7. Ruth Weatherall, 2020. "Even when those struggles are not our own: Storytelling and solidarity in a feminist social justice organization," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 471-486, July.
    8. Kirsten Locke & Rebecca W. B. Lund & Susan Wright, 2021. "Rethinking gender equity in the contaminated university: A methodology for listening for music in the ruins," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1079-1097, May.
    9. Patricia Lewis & Maria Adamson & Ingrid Biese & Elisabeth Kelan, 2019. "Introduction to special issue: Exploring the emergence of moderate feminism(s) in contemporary organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1063-1072, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate Kenny, 2024. "Feminist social movements and whistleblowing disclosures: Ireland's Women of Honour," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 961-982, May.
    2. Fitri Hariana Oktaviani & Bernard McKenna & Terrance Fitzsimmons, 2021. "Trapped within ideological wars: Femininities in a Muslim society and the contest of women as leaders," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1152-1176, May.
    3. Julia Gruson‐Wood & Carla Rice & Jess Haines & Gwen E. Chapman, 2022. "The emotional toll of postfeminist fatherhood," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 256-272, January.
    4. Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2020. "Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2421-2447, December.
    5. Brad M. Barber & Wei Jiang & Adair Morse & Manju Puri & Heather Tookes & Ingrid M. Werner, 2021. "What Explains Differences in Finance Research Productivity during the Pandemic?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(4), pages 1655-1697, August.
    6. Wenxuan Shi & Renli Wu, 2024. "Women’s strength in science: exploring the influence of female participation on research impact and innovation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4529-4551, July.
    7. Nataly Matias-Rayme & Iuliana Botezan & Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa & Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez, 2024. "Gender assignment in doctoral theses: revisiting Teseo with a method based on cultural consensus theory," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4553-4572, July.
    8. Nakajima, Kazuki & Liu, Ruodan & Shudo, Kazuyuki & Masuda, Naoki, 2023. "Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    9. Kate White & Paula Burkinshaw, 2019. "Women and Leadership in Higher Education: Special Issue Editorial," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-7, July.
    10. Tove Faber Frandsen & Rasmus Højbjerg Jacobsen & Jakob Ousager, 2020. "Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1511-1527, August.
    11. Elina Meliou & Mustafa Ozbilgin, 2024. "How is the Illusio of Gender Equality in Entrepreneurship Sustained? A Bourdieusian Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1536-1561, June.
    12. George Kandathil & Rajeshwari Chennangodu, 2024. "Postfeminist individuating of a women collective and the strugglesome emergence of a relational collective feminist solidarity: The story of Kudumbashree, a Kerala state‐instituted women empowerment p," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 115-132, January.
    13. Muhammad Aqeel Awan & Daniela Pianezzi, 2023. "Constructing subjects that matter: A case of conditional recognition for Pakistani Khawajasiras," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1124-1141, May.
    14. Pauline Cullen & Mary P. Murphy, 2021. "Responses to the COVID‐19 crisis in Ireland: From feminized to feminist," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 348-365, July.
    15. Awan, Aqeel, 2023. "Constructing subjects that matter: a case of conditional recognition for Pakistani Khawajasiras," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118225, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Maria Inmaculada Tazo & Ana Boyano & Unai Fernandez-Gámiz & Amaia Calleja-Ochoa, 2020. "The Gender Perspective of Professional Competencies in Industrial Engineering Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Cao, Yihui & Sickles, Robin C. & Triebs, Thomas P. & Tumlinson, Justin, 2024. "Linguistic distance to English impedes research performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    18. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, CiriacoAndrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2024. "The moderating role of personal characteristics of authors in the publications’ quality for quantity trade-off," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    19. Magdalena Formanowicz & Marta Witkowska & Weronika Hryniszak & Zuzanna Jakubik & Aleksandra Cisłak, 2023. "Gender bias in special issues: evidence from a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2283-2299, April.
    20. J. Chubb & G. E. Derrick, 2020. "The impact a-gender: gendered orientations towards research Impact and its evaluation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1317-1333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.