IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i4p1683-1696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making black lives don't matter via organizational strategies to avoid the racial debate: The military police in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Alcadipani
  • Dennis Pacheco Lopes da Silva
  • Samira Bueno
  • Renato Sergio de Lima

Abstract

The #BlackLivesMatter movement has raised awareness of the killing of black people by law enforcement agents in the United States specifically and racism in general in different parts of the world. Academics in Management and Organizations have discussed various dimensions of racial inequalities and differences in organizations. However, little discussion has taken place regarding the actual practices deployed by organizations to avoid the racial debate. Based on our experience of doing research into the police in Latin America and engaging in the public debate to stop police killing and the killing of police officers, we discuss here the strategies deployed by the military police forces in Brazil to make black lives don't matter by avoiding discussing the police's role in Brazilian racism. We argue that these strategies make the police to fail to recognize their role in the killing of black people in the country. Despite the Brazilian military police being an extreme case, we suggest organizations maintain more open or more overt strategies that make black lives don't matter and call academics to research and denounce these strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Alcadipani & Dennis Pacheco Lopes da Silva & Samira Bueno & Renato Sergio de Lima, 2021. "Making black lives don't matter via organizational strategies to avoid the racial debate: The military police in Brazil," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1683-1696, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1683-1696
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12698
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pasi Ahonen & Annika Blomberg & Katherine Doerr & Katja Einola & Anna Elkina & Grace Gao & Jennifer Hambleton & Jenny Helin & Astrid Huopalainen & Bjørn Friis Johannsen & Janet Johansson & Pauliina Jä, 2020. "Writing resistance together," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 447-470, July.
    2. L'industria, 2020. "Call for Papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 787-801.
    3. Juliana Cristina Teixeira, 2021. "Brazilian housemaids and COVID‐19: How can they isolate if domestic work stems from racism?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S1), pages 250-259, January.
    4. Rashedur Chowdhury, 2017. "Rana Plaza Fieldwork and Academic Anxiety: Some Reflections," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(7), pages 1111-1117, November.
    5. Myrtle P. Bell & Daphne Berry & Joy Leopold & Stella Nkomo, 2021. "Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S1), pages 39-57, January.
    6. L'industria, 2020. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 173-187.
    7. David Knights & Alison Pullen, 2019. "Masculinity: A contested terrain?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(10), pages 1367-1375, October.
    8. Zhaonan Qu & Isabella Qian & Zhengyuan Zhou, 2020. "Interpretable Personalization via Policy Learning with Linear Decision Boundaries," Papers 2003.07545, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    9. L'industria, 2020. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 367-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    2. Basso, Gaetano & Boeri, Tito & Caiumi, Alessandro & Paccagnella, Marco, 2020. "The New Hazardous Jobs and Worker Reallocation," IZA Discussion Papers 13532, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Jauernig, Johanna & Uhl, Matthias & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2021. "The ethics of corporate hypocrisy: An experimental approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 131.
    4. Reijo Savolainen & Leslie Thomson, 2022. "Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 511-527, April.
    5. Michaelis, Timothy L. & Scheaf, David J. & Carr, Jon C. & Pollack, Jeffrey M., 2022. "An agentic perspective of resourcefulness: Self-reliant and joint resourcefulness behaviors within the entrepreneurship process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    6. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Bylicki, Michał & Budziński, Wiktor & Buczyński, Mateusz, 2022. "Valuing externalities of outdoor advertising in an urban setting – the case of Warsaw," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Lee Yong-Shik, 2020. "Law and Development: Three Irreconcilable Interests – Call for a New Beginning," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 321-333, January.
    8. Michael McAleer, 2021. "A Critique of Recent Medical Research in JAMA on COVID-19," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(1), pages 40-142, March.
    9. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & María-del-Carmen Granada-Abarzuza, 2021. "The Influence of Female Directors and Institutional Pressures on Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms in Latin America," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Aram TERZYAN, 2020. "Change or continuity? Exploring post-revolution state - building in Ukraine and Armenia," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(1), pages 20-41, May.
    11. Michael McAleer, 2021. "A Critique of Recent Medical Research in JAMA on COVID-19," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(1), pages 40-142, March.
    12. Cristiano, S. & Ulgiati, S. & Gonella, F., 2021. "Systemic sustainability and resilience assessment of health systems, addressing global societal priorities: Learnings from a top nonprofit hospital in a bioclimatic building in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Benedikt Fecher & Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, June.
    14. Charpin, Remi & Lee, Min Kyung & Wu, Ting, 2021. "Mobile procurement platforms: Bridging the online and offline worlds in China's restaurant industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Heckelei, Thomas & Huettel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Rommel, Jens, 2021. "The replicability crisis and the p-value debate – what are the consequences for the agricultural and food economics community?," Discussion Papers 316369, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    16. Graeme Auld & Steven Bernstein & Benjamin Cashore & Kelly Levin, 2021. "Managing pandemics as super wicked problems: lessons from, and for, COVID-19 and the climate crisis," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 707-728, December.
    17. Vasja Vehovar & Zdenek Smutny & Alice R. Robbin, 2021. "What is Social Informatics from an International Perspective?," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 207-210.
    18. Christensen, Peter & Osman, Adam, 2021. "The Demand for Mobility: Evidence from an Experiment with Uber Riders," IZA Discussion Papers 14179, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Stephan Kampelmann & Emmanuel Raufflet & Giulia Scialpi, 2020. "Earth, wood, and coffee: empirical evidence on value creation in the circular economy," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/308601, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller, 2021. "Family Firms: A Breed of Extremes?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 663-681, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1683-1696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.