IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v4y2016i2p17-d72354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Benedikt Fecher

    (German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin 10108, Germany
    Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Berlin 10117, Germany)

  • Gert G. Wagner

    (German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin 10108, Germany
    Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Berlin University of Technology, Berlin 10623, Germany)

Abstract

In this article we argue that the current endeavors to achieve open access in scientific literature require a discussion about innovation in scholarly publishing and research infrastructure. Drawing on path dependence theory and addressing different open access (OA) models and recent political endeavors, we argue that academia is once again running the risk of outsourcing the organization of its content.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedikt Fecher & Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:17-:d:72354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/4/2/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/4/2/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L'industria, 2020. "Call for Papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 787-801.
    2. Mirowski, Philip, 2011. "Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674046467, Spring.
    3. Gunther Eysenbach, 2006. "Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles," Working Papers id:626, eSocialSciences.
    4. L'industria, 2020. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 173-187.
    5. Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick & Mueller-Langer, Frank, 2014. "Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1621-1633.
    6. L'industria, 2020. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 367-370.
    7. Declan Butler, 2016. "Dutch lead European push to flip journals to open access," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7584), pages 13-13, January.
    8. Franzoni, Chiara & Sauermann, Henry, 2014. "Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20.
    9. Philip Ball, 2015. "Leading mathematician launches arXiv 'overlay' journal," Nature, Nature, vol. 526(7571), pages 146-146, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan-Carlos Valderrama-Zurián & Remedios Aguilar-Moya & Juan Gorraiz, 2019. "On the bibliometric nature of a foreseeable relationship: open access and education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1031-1057, September.
    2. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    3. Basso, Gaetano & Boeri, Tito & Caiumi, Alessandro & Paccagnella, Marco, 2020. "The New Hazardous Jobs and Worker Reallocation," IZA Discussion Papers 13532, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Jauernig, Johanna & Uhl, Matthias & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2021. "The ethics of corporate hypocrisy: An experimental approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 131.
    5. Reijo Savolainen & Leslie Thomson, 2022. "Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 511-527, April.
    6. Michaelis, Timothy L. & Scheaf, David J. & Carr, Jon C. & Pollack, Jeffrey M., 2022. "An agentic perspective of resourcefulness: Self-reliant and joint resourcefulness behaviors within the entrepreneurship process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    7. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Bylicki, Michał & Budziński, Wiktor & Buczyński, Mateusz, 2022. "Valuing externalities of outdoor advertising in an urban setting – the case of Warsaw," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Lee Yong-Shik, 2020. "Law and Development: Three Irreconcilable Interests – Call for a New Beginning," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 321-333, January.
    9. Michael McAleer, 2021. "A Critique of Recent Medical Research in JAMA on COVID-19," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(1), pages 40-142, March.
    10. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & María-del-Carmen Granada-Abarzuza, 2021. "The Influence of Female Directors and Institutional Pressures on Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms in Latin America," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Aram TERZYAN, 2020. "Change or continuity? Exploring post-revolution state - building in Ukraine and Armenia," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(1), pages 20-41, May.
    12. Michael McAleer, 2021. "A Critique of Recent Medical Research in JAMA on COVID-19," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(1), pages 40-142, March.
    13. Cristiano, S. & Ulgiati, S. & Gonella, F., 2021. "Systemic sustainability and resilience assessment of health systems, addressing global societal priorities: Learnings from a top nonprofit hospital in a bioclimatic building in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Charpin, Remi & Lee, Min Kyung & Wu, Ting, 2021. "Mobile procurement platforms: Bridging the online and offline worlds in China's restaurant industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Heckelei, Thomas & Huettel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Rommel, Jens, 2021. "The replicability crisis and the p-value debate – what are the consequences for the agricultural and food economics community?," Discussion Papers 316369, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    16. Graeme Auld & Steven Bernstein & Benjamin Cashore & Kelly Levin, 2021. "Managing pandemics as super wicked problems: lessons from, and for, COVID-19 and the climate crisis," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 707-728, December.
    17. Vasja Vehovar & Zdenek Smutny & Alice R. Robbin, 2021. "What is Social Informatics from an International Perspective?," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 207-210.
    18. Christensen, Peter & Osman, Adam, 2021. "The Demand for Mobility: Evidence from an Experiment with Uber Riders," IZA Discussion Papers 14179, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Stephan Kampelmann & Emmanuel Raufflet & Giulia Scialpi, 2020. "Earth, wood, and coffee: empirical evidence on value creation in the circular economy," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/308601, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller, 2021. "Family Firms: A Breed of Extremes?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 663-681, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; Open Access; research infrastructure; scholarly publishing; green open access; gold open access; diamond open access; journal flipping;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:17-:d:72354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.