IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v6y2007i3p22-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Power in UK Food Retailing Pouvoir de marché du secteur alimentaire de détail au Royaume‐Uni Marktmacht im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel in Großbritannien

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Lloyd
  • Wyn Morgan

Abstract

Market Power in UK Food Retailing Deepening concentration in the food chain throughout Europe suggests antitrust authorities need to be ever vigilant to deter the use of market power. In this article, the authors highlight some of the problems that regulatory authorities face when collating evidence on the existence and use of market power in the food industry, not least the reticence of food suppliers to inform on supermarkets undertaking anti‐competitive practices. The article argues that the systematic effects that anti‐competitive practices have upon retail and producer prices offer economists the opportunity to detect the exercise of market power in publicly available aggregate data. Drawing on recent research, the article proposes a simple empirical test of the use of market power that is based on economic theory and complementary to extant sources of evidence. While the test does not measure the extent of market power, it does offer a tractable means of detecting its existence. The article summarises the findings from two recent academic papers in which the test has been applied. Results point to the existence of market power in all fresh food products that were assessed, corroborating both the conclusions of the first competition enquiry in 2000 and the recent decision to launch a further investigation into British supermarkets that is due to report in 2007. Au vu de l'accentuation de la concentration de la filière alimentaire dans l'ensemble de l'Europe, les autorités de la concurrence doivent veiller encore davantage à empêcher l'exercice de pouvoirs de marché. Dans cet article, les auteurs mettent l'accent sur certains des problèmes auxquels les autorités réglementaires sont confrontées lorsqu'elles enquêtent sur l'existence et l'exercice de pouvoirs de marché dans l'industrie alimentaire, en particulier la réticence des fournisseurs alimentaires à dénoncer les supermarchés qui exercent des pratiques anticoncurrentielles. Selon cet article, les effets systématiques que les pratiques anticoncurrentielles ont sur les prix à la production et de détail permettent aux économistes de détecter l'exercice de pouvoirs de marchéà partir de données agrégées publiées. A partir de recherches récentes, cet article propose un test empirique simple pour détecter l'exercice de pouvoirs de marché. Il est fondé sur la théorie économique et est complémentaire aux sources d'information existantes. Le test ne mesure pas l'intensité du pouvoir de marché mais il offre un moyen aisé de détecter son existence. Cet article résume les résultats de deux articles académiques récents dans lesquels ce test a été employé. Les résultats indiquent l'existence de pouvoir de marché pour tous les produits alimentaires frais qui ont étéétudiés. Ils corroborent donc les conclusions de la première enquête sur la concurrence de 2000 et la récente décision de lancer une enquête supplémentaire portant sur les supermarchés britanniques, dont les conclusions devraient être rendues en 2007. Die zunehmende Konzentration auf die Nahrungskette überall in Europa deutet darauf hin, dass die Kartellämter stets wachsam sein müssen, um den Gebrauch von Marktmacht zu verhindern. Dieser Beitrag hebt einige jener Probleme hervor, denen die Aufsichtsbehörden gegenüber stehen, wenn sie Beweismaterial für die Existenz und den Gebrauch von Marktmacht in der Lebensmittelindustrie zusammen tragen, wie z.B. nicht zuletzt das Widerstreben der Lebensmittelzulieferer, Supermärkte mit wettbewerbswidrigen Methoden zu melden. In diesem Beitrag wird dargelegt, dass die systematischen Auswirkungen von wettbewerbswidrigen Methoden auf die Einzelhandels‐ und Erzeugerpreise den Ökonomen eine Gelegenheit bieten, den Gebrauch von Marktmacht an Hand von öffentlich zugänglichen, aggregierten Daten aufzudecken. Unter Berücksichtigung der jüngsten Forschungsergebnisse wird in diesem Beitrag ein einfacher empirischer Test für den Gebrauch von Marktmacht vorgeschlagen, welcher auf der Wirtschaftstheorie basiert und die vorhandenen Beweisquellen ergänzt. Obwohl der Test nicht den Umfang der Marktmacht misst, handelt es sich doch dabei um ein einfaches Mittel, um deren Existenz aufzudecken. In diesem Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse zweier kürzlich verfasster wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen zusammengefasst, in welchen der Test angewendet wurde. Die Ergebnisse legen es nahe, dass die Marktmacht in allen untersuchten Lebensmittelprodukten vorhanden ist. Dies untermauert sowohl die Schlussfolgerungen der ersten Wettbewerbsuntersuchung aus dem Jahr 2000 als auch die vor kurzem getroffene Entscheidung, eine weitere Untersuchung der britischen Supermärkte zu veranlassen, deren Ergebnisse im Jahr 2007 vorgestellt werden sollen.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Lloyd & Wyn Morgan, 2007. "Market Power in UK Food Retailing Pouvoir de marché du secteur alimentaire de détail au Royaume‐Uni Marktmacht im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel in Großbritannien," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 22-29, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:3:p:22-29
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00071.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00071.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00071.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Clarke & Stephen Davies & Paul Dobson & Michael Waterson, 2002. "Buyer Power and Competition in European Food Retailing," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2405.
    2. Paul Wilson, 2003. "Papers from a Mini‐symposium on Competition in the Food Industry: An Introduction," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 85-87, March.
    3. John Vickers, 2005. "Abuse of Market Power," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 115(504), pages 244-261, June.
    4. T. A. Lloyd & S. McCorriston & C. W. Morgan & A. J. Rayner, 2006. "Food scares, market power and price transmission: the UK BSE crisis," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(2), pages 119-147, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Götz, Linde & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan & Kachel, Yael, 2014. "Vertical Price Transmission in the International Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chain: Israeli Grapefruit Exports to the EU after Export Liberalisation," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 53(2), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    2. Islam Hassouneh & Teresa Serra & José M. Gil, 2010. "Price transmission in the Spanish bovine sector: the BSE effect," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(1), pages 33-42, January.
    3. Lloyd, Tim A. & McCorriston, Steve & Morgan, C. Wyn & Weldegebriel, Habtu T., 2007. "Buyer Market Power in UK Food Retailing," Working Papers 46007, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    4. Zhiyong Liu & Yue Qiao, 2012. "Abuse of Market Dominance Under China’s 2007 Anti-monopoly Law: A Preliminary Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(1), pages 77-107, August.
    5. Assefa, Tsion & Meuwissen, Miranda & Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2015. "Food scares and price volatility: the case of German and Spanish pig chains," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210966, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Stéphanie Truchet & Nicolas Mauhe & Marie Herve, 2017. "Veterinarian shortage areas: what determines the location of new graduates?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 255-282, December.
    7. repec:lic:licosd:35114 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Simshauser, Paul & Whish-Wilson, Patrick, 2017. "Price discrimination in Australia's retail electricity markets: An analysis of Victoria & Southeast Queensland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 92-103.
    9. Ioanna Reziti & Yannis Panagopoulos, 2008. "Asymmetric price transmission in the greek agri-food sector: some tests," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 16-30.
    10. Sebastian Koos, 2011. "Varieties of Environmental Labelling, Market Structures, and Sustainable Consumption Across Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational and Market Supply Determinants of Environmental-Labelled Go," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 127-151, March.
    11. May, Daniel E., 2011. "Incentives of small countries to participate in a global free trade agreement in agriculture: a theoretical analysis," Economi­a Agraria (Revista Economia Agraria), Agrarian Economist Association (AEA), Chile, vol. 15, pages 1-7.
    12. Perrigot, Rozenn & Barros, Carlos Pestana, 2008. "Technical efficiency of French retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 296-305.
    13. Simshauser, Paul, 2018. "Price discrimination and the modes of failure in deregulated retail electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 54-70.
    14. Monterio, G.F.A. & Farina, Elizabeth Maria Mercier Querido & Nunes, R., 2008. "Market Structure and Competition in Food Retail: Some Evidences from Brazil," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44199, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Nazmus Sakib & Federica Appiotti & Filippo Magni & Denis Maragno & Alberto Innocenti & Elena Gissi & Francesco Musco, 2018. "Addressing the Passenger Transport and Accessibility Enablers for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Paul W. Dobson & Michael Waterson, 2005. "Chain‐Store Pricing Across Local Markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 93-119, March.
    17. van Damme, E.E.C. & Larouche, P. & Müller, W., 2006. "Abuse of a Dominant Position : Cases and Experiments," Other publications TiSEM 7e471876-96e7-46c7-a956-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Øystein Foros & Hans Jarle Kind, 2008. "Do Slotting Allowances Harm Retail Competition?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 110(2), pages 367-384, June.
    19. Dobson, Paul W. & Waterson, Michael, 2007. "The competition effects of industry-wide vertical price fixing in bilateral oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 935-962, October.
    20. Jitka Sirohi & Zuzana Hloušková & Klára Bartoňová & Karel Malec & Mansoor Maitah & Robert Koželský, 2023. "The Vertical Price Transmission in Pork Meat Production in the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    21. Carlos Noton & Andrés Elberg, 2013. "Revealing Bargaining Power through Actual Wholesale Prices," Documentos de Trabajo 304, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:3:p:22-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.