IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v67y2011i3p975-986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kernel Machine Approach to Testing the Significance of Multiple Genetic Markers for Risk Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxi Cai
  • Giulia Tonini
  • Xihong Lin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxi Cai & Giulia Tonini & Xihong Lin, 2011. "Kernel Machine Approach to Testing the Significance of Multiple Genetic Markers for Risk Prediction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 975-986, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:67:y:2011:i:3:p:975-986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01544.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelle J. Goeman & Sara A. Van De Geer & Hans C. Van Houwelingen, 2006. "Testing against a high dimensional alternative," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 477-493, June.
    2. Dawei Liu & Xihong Lin & Debashis Ghosh, 2007. "Semiparametric Regression of Multidimensional Genetic Pathway Data: Least-Squares Kernel Machines and Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1079-1088, December.
    3. Yuhyun Park, 2003. "Estimating subject-specific survival functions under the accelerated failure time model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(3), pages 717-723, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun Jiehuan & Herazo-Maya Jose D. & Wang Jane-Ling & Kaminski Naftali & Zhao Hongyu, 2019. "LCox: a tool for selecting genes related to survival outcomes using longitudinal gene expression data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Lin Zhang & Inyoung Kim, 2021. "Finite mixtures of semiparametric Bayesian survival kernel machine regressions: Application to breast cancer gene pathway subgroup analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 251-269, March.
    3. Fan, Caiyun & Lu, Wenbin & Zhou, Yong, 2021. "Testing error heterogeneity in censored linear regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Ghosh, Debashis, 2014. "An asymptotically minimax kernel machine," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 33-38.
    5. Wenjing Qi & Andrew S Allen & Yi-Ju Li, 2019. "Family-based association tests for rare variants with censored traits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Cho, Youngjoo & Zhan, Xiang & Ghosh, Debashis, 2022. "Nonlinear predictive directions in clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Yuanyuan Shen & Tianxi Cai, 2016. "Identifying predictive markers for personalized treatment selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1017-1025, December.
    8. Dehan Kong & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Eunjee Lee & Hongtu Zhu, 2018. "FLCRM: Functional linear cox regression model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 109-117, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long Qu & Tobias Guennel & Scott L. Marshall, 2013. "Linear Score Tests for Variance Components in Linear Mixed Models and Applications to Genetic Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 883-892, December.
    2. Zaili Fang & Inyoung Kim & Jeesun Jung, 2018. "Semiparametric Kernel-Based Regression for Evaluating Interaction Between Pathway Effect and Covariate," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 129-152, March.
    3. Roland A. Matsouaka & Junlong Li & Tianxi Cai, 2014. "Evaluating marker-guided treatment selection strategies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 489-499, September.
    4. Arnab Maity & Xihong Lin, 2011. "Powerful Tests for Detecting a Gene Effect in the Presence of Possible Gene–Gene Interactions Using Garrote Kernel Machines," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1271-1284, December.
    5. Teran Hidalgo, Sebastian J. & Wu, Michael C. & Engel, Stephanie M. & Kosorok, Michael R., 2018. "Goodness-of-fit test for nonparametric regression models: Smoothing spline ANOVA models as example," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 135-155.
    6. Lin Zhang & Inyoung Kim, 2021. "Finite mixtures of semiparametric Bayesian survival kernel machine regressions: Application to breast cancer gene pathway subgroup analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 251-269, March.
    7. Zihuai He & Min Zhang & Seunggeun Lee & Jennifer A. Smith & Sharon L. R. Kardia & V. Diez Roux & Bhramar Mukherjee, 2017. "Set-Based Tests for the Gene–Environment Interaction in Longitudinal Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 966-978, July.
    8. Layla Parast & Beth Ann Griffin, 2017. "Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 161-182, April.
    9. Chakraborty, Sounak, 2009. "Bayesian binary kernel probit model for microarray based cancer classification and gene selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4198-4209, October.
    10. Bin Guo & Song Xi Chen, 2016. "Tests for high dimensional generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1079-1102, November.
    11. Tianxi Cai & Lu Tian & L. J. Wei, 2004. "Semi-parametric Box-Cox Power Transformation Models for Censored Survival Observations," Harvard University Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1006, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    12. Layla Parast & Carolyn M. Rutter, 2017. "Discussion of “A risk-based measure of time-varying prognostic discrimination for survival models,” by C. Jason Liang and Patrick J. Heagerty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 742-744, September.
    13. Fan, Caiyun & Lu, Wenbin & Zhou, Yong, 2021. "Testing error heterogeneity in censored linear regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Yunxuan Jiang & Karen N. Conneely & Michael P. Epstein, 2018. "Robust Rare-Variant Association Tests for Quantitative Traits in General Pedigrees," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(3), pages 491-505, December.
    15. Gong, Siliang & Zhang, Kai & Liu, Yufeng, 2018. "Efficient test-based variable selection for high-dimensional linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.
    16. Glen McGee & Ander Wilson & Thomas F. Webster & Brent A. Coull, 2023. "Bayesian multiple index models for environmental mixtures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 462-474, March.
    17. Rui Wang & Xingzhong Xu, 2021. "A Bayesian-motivated test for high-dimensional linear regression models with fixed design matrix," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1821-1852, August.
    18. Pluta, Dustin & Yu, Zhaoxia & Shen, Tong & Chen, Chuansheng & Xue, Gui & Ombao, Hernando, 2018. "Statistical methods and challenges in connectome genetics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 83-86.
    19. Ma, Yingying & Lan, Wei & Wang, Hansheng, 2015. "Testing predictor significance with ultra high dimensional multivariate responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 275-286.
    20. Lebrec Jeremie J & Stijnen Theo & van Houwelingen Hans C, 2010. "Dealing with Heterogeneity between Cohorts in Genomewide SNP Association Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:67:y:2011:i:3:p:975-986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.