IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v23y2018i1d10.1007_s13253-017-0317-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semiparametric Kernel-Based Regression for Evaluating Interaction Between Pathway Effect and Covariate

Author

Listed:
  • Zaili Fang

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University)

  • Inyoung Kim

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University)

  • Jeesun Jung

    (National Institutes of Health)

Abstract

Pathway-based analysis has the ability to detect subtle changes in response variables that could be missed when using gene-based analysis. Since genes interact with other covariates such as environmental or clinical variables, so do pathways, which are sets of genes that serve particular cellular or physiological functions. However, since pathways are sets of genes and since environmental or clinical variables do not have parametric relationships with response variables, it is difficult to model unknown interaction terms between high-dimensional variables and low-dimensional variables as environmental or clinical variables. In this paper, we propose a semiparametric interaction model for two unknown functions to evaluate the interaction between a pathway and environmental or clinical variable: for the pathway, we use an unknown high-dimensional function, and for environmental or clinical variable, we use an unknown low-dimensional function. We model the environmental or clinical variable nonparametrically via a natural cubic spline. We model both the pathway effect and the interaction between the pathway and environmental or clinical effect nonparametrically via a kernel machine. Since both interactions among genes within the same pathway and the interaction between the pathway and the environmental or clinical variables are complex, we allow for the possibility that a pathway is interacting with environmental or clinical variables and the genes within the same pathway are interacting with each other. We illustrate our approach using simulated data and genetic pathway data for type II diabetes. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaili Fang & Inyoung Kim & Jeesun Jung, 2018. "Semiparametric Kernel-Based Regression for Evaluating Interaction Between Pathway Effect and Covariate," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 129-152, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0317-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-017-0317-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-017-0317-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-017-0317-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnab Maity & Xihong Lin, 2011. "Powerful Tests for Detecting a Gene Effect in the Presence of Possible Gene–Gene Interactions Using Garrote Kernel Machines," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1271-1284, December.
    2. Ciprian Crainiceanu & David Ruppert & Gerda Claeskens & M. P. Wand, 2005. "Exact likelihood ratio tests for penalised splines," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(1), pages 91-103, March.
    3. Zaili Fang & Inyoung Kim & Patrick Schaumont, 2016. "Flexible variable selection for recovering sparsity in nonadditive nonparametric models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1155-1163, December.
    4. Gerda Claeskens, 2004. "Restricted likelihood ratio lack‐of‐fit tests using mixed spline models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 909-926, November.
    5. Lulu Cheng & Inyoung Kim & Herbert Pang, 2016. "Bayesian Semiparametric Model for Pathway-Based Analysis with Zero-Inflated Clinical Outcomes," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 641-662, December.
    6. Dawei Liu & Xihong Lin & Debashis Ghosh, 2007. "Semiparametric Regression of Multidimensional Genetic Pathway Data: Least-Squares Kernel Machines and Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1079-1088, December.
    7. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lulu Cheng & Inyoung Kim & Herbert Pang, 2016. "Bayesian Semiparametric Model for Pathway-Based Analysis with Zero-Inflated Clinical Outcomes," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 641-662, December.
    2. Sonja Greven & Ciprian Crainiceanu, 2013. "On likelihood ratio testing for penalized splines," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 97(4), pages 387-402, October.
    3. Xia Zheng & Yaohua Rong & Ling Liu & Weihu Cheng, 2021. "A More Accurate Estimation of Semiparametric Logistic Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Rong Chen & Hua Liang & Jing Wang, 2011. "Determination of linear components in additive models," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 367-383.
    5. Zaili Fang & Inyoung Kim & Patrick Schaumont, 2016. "Flexible variable selection for recovering sparsity in nonadditive nonparametric models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1155-1163, December.
    6. J. D. Opsomer & G. Claeskens & M. G. Ranalli & G. Kauermann & F. J. Breidt, 2008. "Non‐parametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 265-286, February.
    7. Ana-Maria Staicu & Yingxing Li & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu & David Ruppert, 2014. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Dependent Data with Applications to Longitudinal and Functional Data Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 932-949, December.
    8. Youngchao Ge & Sandrine Dudoit & Terence Speed, 2003. "Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 1-77, June.
    9. Bajgrowicz, Pierre & Scaillet, Olivier, 2012. "Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 473-491.
    10. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    11. Dørum Guro & Snipen Lars & Solheim Margrete & Saebo Solve, 2011. "Smoothing Gene Expression Data with Network Information Improves Consistency of Regulated Genes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Jianqing Fan & Xu Han, 2017. "Estimation of the false discovery proportion with unknown dependence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1143-1164, September.
    13. A Bottle & P Aylin, 2011. "Predicting the false alarm rate in multi-institution mortality monitoring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1711-1718, September.
    14. Van Hanh Nguyen & Catherine Matias, 2014. "On Efficient Estimators of the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses in a Multiple Testing Setup," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1167-1194, December.
    15. Shigeyuki Matsui & Hisashi Noma, 2011. "Estimating Effect Sizes of Differentially Expressed Genes for Power and Sample-Size Assessments in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1225-1235, December.
    16. Lianming Wang & David B. Dunson, 2010. "Semiparametric Bayes Multiple Testing: Applications to Tumor Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 493-501, June.
    17. Ebrahimi, Nader, 2008. "Simultaneous control of false positives and false negatives in multiple hypotheses testing," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 437-450, March.
    18. B. Moerkerke & E. Goetghebeur & J. De Riek & I. Roldán‐Ruiz, 2006. "Significance and impotence: towards a balanced view of the null and the alternative hypotheses in marker selection for plant breeding," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(1), pages 61-79, January.
    19. Mark Rempel, 2016. "Improving Overnight Loan Identification in Payments Systems," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2-3), pages 549-564, March.
    20. Timothy B. Armstrong, 2014. "Adaptive Testing on a Regression Function at a Point," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1957R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Feb 2015.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0317-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.