IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v64y2008i4p1215-1222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening for Partial Conjunction Hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Yoav Benjamini
  • Ruth Heller

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoav Benjamini & Ruth Heller, 2008. "Screening for Partial Conjunction Hypotheses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1215-1222, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:64:y:2008:i:4:p:1215-1222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00984.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John D. Storey & Jonathan E. Taylor & David Siegmund, 2004. "Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 187-205, February.
    2. Yoav Benjamini & Daniel Yekutieli, 2005. "False Discovery Rate-Adjusted Multiple Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 71-81, March.
    3. Loughin, Thomas M., 2004. "A systematic comparison of methods for combining p-values from independent tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 467-485, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Amar & Ron Shamir & Daniel Yekutieli, 2017. "Extracting replicable associations across multiple studies: Empirical Bayes algorithms for controlling the false discovery rate," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. T. Tony Cai & Wenguang Sun & Weinan Wang, 2019. "Covariate‐assisted ranking and screening for large‐scale two‐sample inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 187-234, April.
    3. Qunhua Li & Feipeng Zhang, 2018. "A regression framework for assessing covariate effects on the reproducibility of high‐throughput experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 803-813, September.
    4. Philippe Vindras & Michel Desmurget & Pierre Baraduc, 2012. "When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Simple Statistical Method to Deal with Across-Individual Variations of Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Saumard, Adrien & Wellner, Jon A., 2018. "Efron’s monotonicity property for measures on R2," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 212-224.
    6. Eric F. Lock & David B. Dunson, 2017. "Bayesian genome- and epigenome-wide association studies with gene level dependence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 1018-1028, September.
    7. Hillary Koch & Cheryl A. Keller & Guanjue Xiang & Belinda Giardine & Feipeng Zhang & Yicheng Wang & Ross C. Hardison & Qunhua Li, 2022. "CLIMB: High-dimensional association detection in large scale genomic data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Ruth Heller, 2020. "Comments on: Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 51-55, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingyun Cai & Hock Peng Chan, 2017. "A Double Application of the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure for Testing Batched Hypotheses," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 429-443, June.
    2. Andrew Y. Chen & Tom Zimmermann, 2022. "Publication Bias in Asset Pricing Research," Papers 2209.13623, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    3. Yoav Benjamini, 2010. "Discovering the false discovery rate," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 405-416, September.
    4. Timothy B. Armstrong & Michal Kolesár & Mikkel Plagborg‐Møller, 2022. "Robust Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2567-2602, November.
    5. Bajgrowicz, Pierre & Scaillet, Olivier, 2012. "Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 473-491.
    6. Lan, Wei & Ding, Yue & Fang, Zheng & Fang, Kuangnan, 2016. "Testing covariates in high dimension linear regression with latent factors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 25-37.
    7. Marco Marozzi, 2012. "A combined test for differences in scale based on the interquantile range," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 61-72, February.
    8. Zarrabi, Nima & Snaith, Stuart & Coakley, Jerry, 2017. "FX technical trading rules can be profitable sometimes!," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 113-127.
    9. Gontscharuk, Veronika & Finner, Helmut, 2013. "Asymptotic FDR control under weak dependence: A counterexample," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(8), pages 1888-1893.
    10. Jianqing Fan & Xu Han, 2017. "Estimation of the false discovery proportion with unknown dependence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1143-1164, September.
    11. Guo, Wenge & Bhaskara Rao, M., 2008. "On optimality of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for the false discovery rate," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(14), pages 2024-2030, October.
    12. Gharad Bryan & James J Choi & Dean Karlan, 2021. "Randomizing Religion: the Impact of Protestant Evangelism on Economic Outcomes," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(1), pages 293-380.
    13. Jeffrey T. Leek, 2011. "Asymptotic Conditional Singular Value Decomposition for High-Dimensional Genomic Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 344-352, June.
    14. Shigeyuki Matsui & Hisashi Noma, 2011. "Estimating Effect Sizes of Differentially Expressed Genes for Power and Sample-Size Assessments in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1225-1235, December.
    15. Lianming Wang & David B. Dunson, 2010. "Semiparametric Bayes Multiple Testing: Applications to Tumor Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 493-501, June.
    16. Toshiaki Tsukurimichi & Yu Inatsu & Vo Nguyen Le Duy & Ichiro Takeuchi, 2022. "Conditional selective inference for robust regression and outlier detection using piecewise-linear homotopy continuation," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(6), pages 1197-1228, December.
    17. Hanck, Christoph, 2011. "Now, whose schools are really better (or weaker) than Germany's? A multiple testing approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 1739-1746, July.
    18. Dette, Holger & Hoderlein, Stefan & Neumeyer, Natalie, 2016. "Testing multivariate economic restrictions using quantiles: The example of Slutsky negative semidefiniteness," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 129-144.
    19. Keith Cuthbertson & Dirk Nitzsche & Niall O'Sullivan, 2012. "False Discoveries in UK Mutual Fund Performance," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 444-463, June.
    20. Hunt, Daniel L. & Cheng, Cheng & Pounds, Stanley, 2009. "The beta-binomial distribution for estimating the number of false rejections in microarray gene expression studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1688-1700, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:64:y:2008:i:4:p:1215-1222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.