IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0039059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Simple Statistical Method to Deal with Across-Individual Variations of Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Vindras
  • Michel Desmurget
  • Pierre Baraduc

Abstract

In science, it is a common experience to discover that although the investigated effect is very clear in some individuals, statistical tests are not significant because the effect is null or even opposite in other individuals. Indeed, t-tests, Anovas and linear regressions compare the average effect with respect to its inter-individual variability, so that they can fail to evidence a factor that has a high effect in many individuals (with respect to the intra-individual variability). In such paradoxical situations, statistical tools are at odds with the researcher’s aim to uncover any factor that affects individual behavior, and not only those with stereotypical effects. In order to go beyond the reductive and sometimes illusory description of the average behavior, we propose a simple statistical method: applying a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to assess whether the distribution of p-values provided by individual tests is significantly biased towards zero. Using Monte-Carlo studies, we assess the power of this two-step procedure with respect to RM Anova and multilevel mixed-effect analyses, and probe its robustness when individual data violate the assumption of normality and homoscedasticity. We find that the method is powerful and robust even with small sample sizes for which multilevel methods reach their limits. In contrast to existing methods for combining p-values, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test has unique resistance to outlier individuals: it cannot yield significance based on a high effect in one or two exceptional individuals, which allows drawing valid population inferences. The simplicity and ease of use of our method facilitates the identification of factors that would otherwise be overlooked because they affect individual behavior in significant but variable ways, and its power and reliability with small sample sizes (

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Vindras & Michel Desmurget & Pierre Baraduc, 2012. "When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Simple Statistical Method to Deal with Across-Individual Variations of Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0039059
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039059&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0039059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoav Benjamini & Ruth Heller, 2008. "Screening for Partial Conjunction Hypotheses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1215-1222, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia Fu & Jiajia Xu & Li Song & Hua Li & Jing Wang & Xiaohua Wu & Yani Hu & Lijun Wei & Lingling Gao & Qiyi Wang & Zhanyi Lin & Huigen Huang, 2015. "Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Amar & Ron Shamir & Daniel Yekutieli, 2017. "Extracting replicable associations across multiple studies: Empirical Bayes algorithms for controlling the false discovery rate," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Hillary Koch & Cheryl A. Keller & Guanjue Xiang & Belinda Giardine & Feipeng Zhang & Yicheng Wang & Ross C. Hardison & Qunhua Li, 2022. "CLIMB: High-dimensional association detection in large scale genomic data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. T. Tony Cai & Wenguang Sun & Weinan Wang, 2019. "Covariate‐assisted ranking and screening for large‐scale two‐sample inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 187-234, April.
    4. Eric F. Lock & David B. Dunson, 2017. "Bayesian genome- and epigenome-wide association studies with gene level dependence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 1018-1028, September.
    5. Qunhua Li & Feipeng Zhang, 2018. "A regression framework for assessing covariate effects on the reproducibility of high‐throughput experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 803-813, September.
    6. Ruth Heller, 2020. "Comments on: Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 51-55, March.
    7. Saumard, Adrien & Wellner, Jon A., 2018. "Efron’s monotonicity property for measures on R2," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 212-224.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0039059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.