IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i5p2388-2407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Knowledge Management Process and Approach on Innovation Performance: A Case Study of Telekom Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Ap-Azli Bunawan

    (School of Information Science, College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Puncak Perdana Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.)

  • Nur Ardilla Fathin Ahmad Sham

    (School of Information Science, College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Puncak Perdana Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.)

Abstract

The paper aims to examine the effect of knowledge management processes (knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization) and knowledge management approaches (codification strategy and personalization strategy) on innovation performance in Telekom Malaysia. Quantitative research has been used as a research approach for the study. Data was collected through an online questionnaire. Out of 172 questionnaires distributed, 172 were returned with a 100 percent response rate. A Partial Least Square approach of Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the research hypothesis, and a path coefficients analysis was conducted, in addition to descriptive statistics that provide a background about the respondents. The analysis showed that there is a significant and positive impact of knowledge management processes (knowledge sharing & knowledge utilization) on innovation performance in Telekom Malaysia, as well as a significant and positive effect of personalization strategy approaches on innovation performance, whereas the knowledge process (knowledge acquisition) and (codification strategy) does not. This study contributed new insights to our present understanding of the impact of knowledge management processes and approaches on innovation performance in the telecommunications industries. With the help of these contributions, Telekom Malaysia can implement the proper knowledge management and practises in order to make better decisions in many ways of innovation performance. Although there are several sorts of innovation, all of them contribute to the generation of new knowledge within the organization

Suggested Citation

  • Ap-Azli Bunawan & Nur Ardilla Fathin Ahmad Sham, 2024. "The Impact of Knowledge Management Process and Approach on Innovation Performance: A Case Study of Telekom Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 2388-2407, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:2388-2407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-5/2388-2407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-impact-of-knowledge-management-process-and-approach-on-innovation-performance-a-case-study-of-telekom-malaysia/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Asrar-ul-Haq & Sadia Anwar, 2016. "A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1127744-112, December.
    2. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-06-2021-0137 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Helena Yli‐Renko & Erkko Autio & Harry J. Sapienza, 2001. "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 587-613, June.
    4. Michael O’Meara & Felicity Kelliher, 2021. "Knowledge Codification," Springer Books, in: Carolina Machado & J. Paulo Davim (ed.), Knowledge Management and Learning Organizations, pages 25-50, Springer.
    5. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    6. Giovanni Mangiarotti & Anne-Laure Mention, 2015. "Investigating Firm-Level Effects Of Knowledge Management Strategies On Innovation Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-24.
    7. Nguyen Ngoc Thang & Pham Anh Tuan, 2020. "Knowledge acquisition, knowledge management strategy and innovation: An empirical study of Vietnamese firms," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1786314-178, January.
    8. Samar Rahi & Mahmoud Alghizzawi & Sajjad Ahmad & Mubbsher Munawar Khan & Abdul Hafaz Ngah, 2021. "Does employee readiness to change impact organization change implementation? Empirical evidence from emerging economy," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 235-253, November.
    9. Carnevale, Joel B. & Hatak, Isabella, 2020. "Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 183-187.
    10. Vida Davidavičienė & Khaled Al Majzoub & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2020. "Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Teams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Ikujiro Nonaka & Ryoko Toyama, 2003. "The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 2-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Chavez, 2014. "Customer integration, information quality and operational performance: A social capital view," Working Papers 57, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad Diego Portales.
    2. Ghadah Lafi Alharbi & Monira Essa Aloud, 2024. "The effects of knowledge management processes on service sector performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Qu, Guannan & Wang, Luyao & Chen, Jin & Sun, Tara Qian, 2024. "How to transform “social value” into meaningful products? ——A multiple-case study of leading innovative enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Constantin BRATIANU & Nicolae Alexandru BUDEANU, 2023. "National Security Intelligence and Business Intelligence: A Comparative Analysis," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 188-197, May.
    5. McCarthy, Killian J & Aalbers, Hendrik Leendert, 2022. "Alliance-to-acquisition transitions: The technological performance implications of acquiring one's alliance partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    6. Budeanu Nicolae Alexandru, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis Regarding Knowledge Strategies in Intelligence Structures," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1179-1192, July.
    7. Jörg Zimmermann & Wolfgang Sofka, 2013. "Knowledge search versus knowledge deployment: How foreignness can be both an asset and a liability for firms," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2013-03, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Tran Huy Phuong, 2019. "How authentic leadership promotes individual knowledge sharing: viewing from the lens of COR theory," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 386-401, December.
    9. Carmen Dolores Blázquez Puerta & Guillermo Bermúdez-González & Ismael P. Soler García, 2022. "Human Systematic Innovation Helix: Knowledge Management, Emotional Intelligence and Entrepreneurial Competency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Kathryn Cormican & Chen Meng & Suzana Sampaio & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Knowledge Sharing Practices: An Analysis of Organizational Level Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Marco-Lajara, B. & Úbeda-García, M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. & Manresa-Marhuenda, E., 2023. "The impact of international experience on firm economic performance. The double mediating effect of green knowledge acquisition & eco-innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Dirk De Clercq & Dimo Dimov & Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl, 2013. "Organizational Social Capital, Formalization, and Internal Knowledge Sharing in Entrepreneurial Orientation Formation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(3), pages 505-537, May.
    13. Sapienza, Harry J. & Parhankangas, Annaleena & Autio, Erkko, 2004. "Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 809-829, November.
    14. Patrick A. Saparito & Joseph E. Coombs, 2013. "Bureaucratic Systems’ Facilitating and Hindering Influence on Social Capital," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(3), pages 625-639, May.
    15. Roden, Sinéad & Lawson, Benn, 2014. "Developing social capital in buyer–supplier relationships: The contingent effect of relationship-specific adaptations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 89-99.
    16. Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel & Sanz-Valle, Raquel, 2011. "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 408-417, April.
    17. Tzu-Hsin Liu & Yung-Chang Hsiao, 2019. "Fitting cooperative mode in inter-organizational strategic alliance: a perspective from innovative and financial performances," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 73-96, February.
    18. Mia Hsiao-Wen Ho & Pervez N. Ghauri & Mario Kafouros, 2019. "Knowledge Acquisition in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Knowledge Ambiguity," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 439-463, June.
    19. De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2015. "Intergenerational strategy involvement and family firms’ innovation pursuits: The critical roles of conflict management and social capital," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 178-189.
    20. François Therin, 2003. "Learning Organization and Innovation Performance in High-Tech Small Firms," Post-Print hal-00451466, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:2388-2407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.