IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aou/nszioz/y2023i4p69-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of justice in development of temporary teams: Evidence from the high-tech industry

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Rogala
  • Bartosz Bartniczak
  • Tomasz Brzozowski
  • Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska
  • Marta Moczulska
  • Agnieszka Panasiewicz
  • Adam Płachciak
  • Sabina Zaremba-Warnke

Abstract

Justice is a category that significantly impacts corporate performance. It has been shown in many scientific publications that it affects, among other things, the motivation and commitment of employees, shapes the atmosphere in the workplace and influences employee performance. However, research has yet to be done on the effect of justice on the effectiveness of temporary teams (set up for a limited time to solve a problem or carry out a project), even though such teams are now a common form of teamwork. This study is intended to fill an identified research gap. Its purpose is to determine whether justice affects the effectiveness of temporary teams in an organisation and, if so, whether all types of justice affect that effectiveness to the same extent. A main hypothesis was formulated: All kinds of justice (procedural, distributive, interpersonal and informational) have the same effect on the effectiveness of the temporary work team. The modified Colquitt scale was used. Differences in the impact between types of justice on the effectiveness of teams have been assessed using the U-Mann-Whitney test. The paper uses the results of a survey conducted among 110 managers from high – tech industry with experience with temporary teams. Based on their information, it has been established that justice has a significant impact on the effectiveness of temporary teams, and the importance of different types of justice varies. The most important in this respect is informational justice. Interpersonal and distributive justice is slightly less important (there is no statistically significant difference between them). Procedural justice ranked third. Based on the results of the research, it can be pointed out that managers should pay attention to the perception of fairness of temporary team members. Above all, they should take care of the communication aspects, including in particular, the sharing of crucial information with employees of this type of team.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Rogala & Bartosz Bartniczak & Tomasz Brzozowski & Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska & Marta Moczulska & Agnieszka Panasiewicz & Adam Płachciak & Sabina Zaremba-Warnke, 2023. "The role of justice in development of temporary teams: Evidence from the high-tech industry," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 4, pages 69-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2023:i:4:p:69-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nsz.wat.edu.pl/pdf-188843-110556
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorg Sydow & Udo Staber, 2002. "The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 215-227.
    2. Giovan Francesco Lanzara, 1983. "Ephemeral Organizations In Extreme Environments: Emergence, Strategy, Extinction [I]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 71-95, January.
    3. Kimberly M. Ellis & Taco H. Reus & Bruce T. Lamont, 2009. "The effects of procedural and informational justice in the integration of related acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 137-161, February.
    4. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Marion Fortin, 2014. "One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 435-451, October.
    5. Kimberly M. Ellis & Taco H. Reus & Bruce T. Lamont, 2009. "Erratum: The effects of procedural and informational justice in the integration of related acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1-1, February.
    6. Shaobo Wei & Weiling Ke & Augustine A. Lado & Hefu Liu & Kwok Kee Wei, 2020. "The Effects of Justice and Top Management Beliefs and Participation: An Exploratory Study in the Context of Digital Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 51-71, September.
    7. Jeanne Le Roy & Marina Bastounis & Jale Minibas-Poussard, 2012. "Interactional Justice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Emotions," Post-Print hal-01615955, HAL.
    8. Jeanne Le Roy & Marina Bastounis & Jale Minibas-Poussard, 2012. "Interactional justice and counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating role of negative emotions," Post-Print hal-00778737, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tessa Melkonian & Guillaume Soenen & Maureen Ambrose, 2016. "Will I Cooperate? The Moderating Role of Informational Distance on Justice Reasoning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 663-675, September.
    2. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    3. Bauer, Florian & King, David & Matzler, Kurt, 2016. "Speed of acquisition integration: Separating the role of human and task integration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 150-165.
    4. Katrin Hussinger & Abdul-Basit Issah, 2019. "Firm Acquisitions by Family Firms: a Mixed Gamble Approach," DEM Discussion Paper Series 19-16, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    5. Mohd Ridwan ABD RAZAK & Enah ALI, 2020. "Interdependence Between Interactional Justice And Job Satisfaction," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 26-39, May.
    6. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    7. Fagbenro Dare A. & Olasupo Mathew O., 2020. "Quality of Family Life and Workplace Deviant Behaviour with Perceived Competence as a Mediator among University Staff," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(2), pages 15-27, June.
    8. Yeunjae Lee, 2022. "Employees’ Negative Megaphoning in Response to Organizational Injustice: The Mediating Role of Employee–Organization Relationship and Negative Affect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 89-103, June.
    9. Changjoon Lee & Byoung-Chun Ha, 2021. "Interactional Justice, Informational Quality, and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comparison of Domestic and Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Bailey, Wendy J. & Sawers, Kimberly M., 2018. "Moving toward a principle-based approach to U.S. accounting standard setting: A demand for procedural justice and accounting reform," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Tamar Almor & Shlomo Y. Tarba & Avital Margalit, 2014. "Maturing, Technology-Based, Born-Global Companies: Surviving Through Mergers and Acquisitions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 421-444, August.
    12. Yang Liu & Peng Cheng & Li Hu, 2022. "How do justice and top management beliefs matter in industrial symbiosis collaboration: An exploratory study from China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 891-906, June.
    13. Reus, T.H., 2014. "Global Strategy: The World is your Oyster (if you can shuck it!)," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2014-059-S&E, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    14. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Degischer, Daniel, 2022. "Contextualizing deliberate learning from acquisitions: The role of organizational and target contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 194-207.
    15. Jin-Young Jung & Wei Wang & Sung-Woo Cho, 2020. "The Role of Confucius Institutes and One Belt, One Road Initiatives on the Values of Cross-Border M&A: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Ralf Bebenroth & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2015. "When Organizational Justice Matters for Affective Merger Commitment," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-22, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    17. Park, Kathleen Marshall & Meglio, Olimpia & Bauer, Florian & Tarba, Shlomo, 2018. "Managing patterns of internationalization, integration, and identity transformation: The post-acquisition metamorphosis of an Arabian Gulf EMNC," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 122-138.
    18. David R. King & Gang Wang & Mehdi Samimi & Andres Felipe Cortes, 2021. "A Meta‐Analytic Integration of Acquisition Performance Prediction," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1198-1236, July.
    19. Shockley, Jeff & Turner, Tobin, 2016. "A relational performance model for developing innovation and long-term orientation in retail franchise organizations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 175-188.
    20. Maimunah Ismail & Nordahlia Umar Baki & Zoharah Omar, 2018. "The Influence Of Organizational Culture And Organizational Justice On Group Cohesion As Perceived By Merger And Acquisition Employees," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2023:i:4:p:69-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Jurek (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.