IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v137y2016i4d10.1007_s10551-015-2744-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will I Cooperate? The Moderating Role of Informational Distance on Justice Reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Tessa Melkonian

    (EMLYON Business School)

  • Guillaume Soenen

    (EMLYON Business School)

  • Maureen Ambrose

    (UCF College of Business Administration)

Abstract

This study examines the influence of a dimension of a strategic organizational change context—namely informational distance—on employees’ justice expectations and their behavioral intentions toward the change. Drawing on research from organizational justice and from construal level theory, we hypothesize that informational distance, i.e., the extent to which employees feel knowledgeable about the coming change, affects the relative influence of the anticipatory justice facets and anticipatory overall justice in predicting support for change. Consistent with the hypotheses, results from participants of a merger suggest that when employees feel less knowledgeable about the future change (high-informational distance), overall anticipatory justice predicts their intention to cooperate with the change. However, when employees feel more knowledgeable about the future change (low-informational distance), anticipatory justice facets predict intention to cooperate. Implications for research on organizational justice and change as well as considerations for practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tessa Melkonian & Guillaume Soenen & Maureen Ambrose, 2016. "Will I Cooperate? The Moderating Role of Informational Distance on Justice Reasoning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 663-675, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:137:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2744-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2744-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-015-2744-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-015-2744-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold, Mark J. & Reynolds, Kristy E., 2012. "Approach and Avoidance Motivation: Investigating Hedonic Consumption in a Retail Setting," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 399-411.
    2. repec:pri:cepsud:125krueger is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tessa Melkonian & Philippe Monin & Niels Noorderhaven, 2011. "Distributive justice, procedural justice, exemplarity, and employee’s willingness to cooperate in M&A integration processes : An analysis of the Air France-KLM Merger," Post-Print hal-02312624, HAL.
    4. Kim, Tae-Yeol & Leung, Kwok, 2007. "Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 83-95, September.
    5. Kimberly M. Ellis & Taco H. Reus & Bruce T. Lamont, 2009. "The effects of procedural and informational justice in the integration of related acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 137-161, February.
    6. Cojuharenco, Irina & Patient, David & Bashshur, Michael R., 2011. "Seeing the "forest" or the "trees" of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 17-31, September.
    7. Kimberly M. Ellis & Taco H. Reus & Bruce T. Lamont, 2009. "Erratum: The effects of procedural and informational justice in the integration of related acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1-1, February.
    8. Daniel Kahneman & Alan B. Krueger & David Schkade & Norbert Schwarz & Arthur A. Stone, 2006. "Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion," Working Papers 77, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    9. Yaakov Weber & Oded Shenkar & Adi Raveh, 1996. "National and Corporate Cultural Fit in Mergers/Acquisitions: An Exploratory Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(8), pages 1215-1227, August.
    10. Daniel Kahneman & Alan B. Krueger & David Schkade & Norbert Schwarz & Arthur A. Stone, 2006. "Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion," Working Papers 77, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    11. Jeanne Wilson & C. Brad Crisp & Mark Mortensen, 2013. "Extending Construal-Level Theory to Distributed Groups: Understanding the Effects of Virtuality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 629-644, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bailey, Wendy J. & Sawers, Kimberly M., 2018. "Moving toward a principle-based approach to U.S. accounting standard setting: A demand for procedural justice and accounting reform," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    2. Yi Lin Chow, Dawn & Wen Chan, Xi & Micelotta, Evelyn, 2021. "Cross-border M&As: Theorizing the negative effect of political ideology mismatch with host country labor institutional context on employee outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 164-173.
    3. Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt & Wolf, Stefan, 2016. "M&A and innovation: The role of integration and cultural differences—A central European targets perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 76-86.
    4. Günter K. Stahl & Chei Hwee Chua & Amy L. Pablo, 2012. "Does National Context Affect Target Firm Employees’ Trust in Acquisitions?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 395-423, June.
    5. Reus, Taco H., 2012. "Culture's consequences for emotional attending during cross-border acquisition implementation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 342-351.
    6. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    7. Gomes, Emanuel & Cohen, Marcel & Mellahi, Kamel, 2011. "When two African cultures collide: A study of interactions between managers in a strategic alliance between two African organizations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 5-12, January.
    8. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2008. "Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1733-1749, April.
    9. Thi Truong An Hoang & Andreas Knabe, 2021. "Time Use, Unemployment, and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis Using British Time-Use Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2525-2548, August.
    10. Naomi Friedman-Sokuler & Claudia Senik, 2022. "Time-Use and Subjective Well-Being: Is there a Preference for Activity Diversity?," PSE Working Papers halshs-03828272, HAL.
    11. Arnaud Mertens & Philippe Van Kerm, 2023. "Commuting time and absenteeism: Evidence from a natural experiment," LISER Working Paper Series 2023-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    12. Deckers Thomas & Falk Armin & Schildberg-Hörisch Hannah, 2016. "Nominal or Real? The Impact of Regional Price Levels on Satisfaction with Life," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 1337-1358, September.
    13. Lalin Anik & Lara B Aknin & Michael I Norton & Elizabeth W Dunn & Jordi Quoidbach, 2013. "Prosocial Bonuses Increase Employee Satisfaction and Team Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    14. Piotr Rogala & Bartosz Bartniczak & Tomasz Brzozowski & Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska & Marta Moczulska & Agnieszka Panasiewicz & Adam Płachciak & Sabina Zaremba-Warnke, 2023. "The role of justice in development of temporary teams: Evidence from the high-tech industry," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 4, pages 69-88.
    15. Alejandro Cid & Daniel Ferres & Máximo Rossi, 2008. "Subjective Well-Being in the Southern Cone: Health, Income and Family," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1308, Department of Economics - dECON.
    16. Aaker, Jennifer L. & Garbinsky, Emily N. & Vohs, Kathleen D., 2011. "Cultivating Admiration in Brands: Warmth, Competence, and Landing in the "Golden Quadrant"," Research Papers 2087, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    17. Koen Decancq & Marc Fleurbaey & Erik Schokkaert, 2015. "Happiness, Equivalent Incomes and Respect for Individual Preferences," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82, pages 1082-1106, December.
    18. Iddisah Sulemana, 2015. "The Effect of Fear of Crime and Crime Victimization on Subjective Well-Being in Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 849-872, April.
    19. Ahuvia, Aaron, 2008. "If money doesn't make us happy, why do we act as if it does?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 491-507, August.
    20. Song, Younghwan, 2015. "A Cross-State Comparison of Measures of Subjective Well-Being," IZA Discussion Papers 9396, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:137:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2744-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.