IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/27441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Concerns About The Fat Content Of Meats Among Primary Grocery Shoppers In Louisiana And Southeast Texas

Author

Listed:
  • McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E.

Abstract

An ordered-probit model was used to assess concerns about the fat content of meats by primary grocery shoppers in Louisiana and southeast Texas. The results suggested that women, married shoppers, or non-Catholics were more likely to have concerns about fat content than men, unmarried shoppers, or Catholics. Price is an important determinant in meat purchasing decisions when fat content is a concern.

Suggested Citation

  • McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 1998. "Assessing Concerns About The Fat Content Of Meats Among Primary Grocery Shoppers In Louisiana And Southeast Texas," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 1-6, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27441
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.27441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/27441/files/29010044.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.27441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Putnam, Judith Jones, 1993. "American Eating Habits Changing: Part 1 Meat, Dairy, and Fats and Oils," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 16(3), September.
    2. Lutz, Steven M. & Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David M., 1993. "Household Characteristics Affect Food Choices," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 16(2), May.
    3. Rose, Donald, 1994. "Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Weight Status," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    4. Frazao, Betsy & Cleveland, Linda, 1994. "Diet-Health Awareness About Fat and Cholesterol-Only a Start," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    5. Shaw, Anne & Davis, Carole, 1994. "The Dietary Guidelines Focus on Reducing Excessive Intakes," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    6. Tippett, Katherine S. & Goldman, Joseph D., 1994. "Diets More Healthful, But Still Fall Short of Dietary Guidelines," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    7. Jordan, Jeffrey L. & Elnagheeb, Abdelmoneim H., 1991. "Public Perceptions Of Food Safety," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 22(3), pages 1-10, September.
    8. Kinsey, Jean D., 1990. "Diverse Demographics Drive The Food Industry," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(2), pages 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui, Jianguo & McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E. & Jones, Dewitt, 1995. "An Empirical Investigation Of Importance Ratings Of Meat Attributes By Louisiana And Texas Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Chen, Kevin & Ali, Murad & Veeman, Michele & Unterschultz, Jim & Le, Theresa, 2002. "Relative Importance Rankings for Pork Attributes by Asian-Origin Consumers in California: Applying an Ordered Probit Model to a Choice-Based Sample," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 67-79, April.
    3. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Hawkes, Gerard F. & Park, Kristen & Perosio, Debra J., 1995. "Supermarket Bakery Consumers: Attitudes, Preferences, Behaviors," Research Bulletins 122993, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1995. "The American Diet: Health and Economic Consequences," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309727, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Veeman, Michele M. & Unterschultz, James R., 2000. "Pork Market Development Research Project: Market Potential For Alberta'S Pork In Selected U.S. Markets," Project Report Series 24054, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    6. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 1999. "An Analysis Of Factors Affecting Consumers' Decisions To Shop At Stores Offering Specialty Meat," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 1-6, March.
    7. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 2001. "An Analysis Of Nutritional Label Use In The Southern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-5, March.
    8. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 1997. "Factors Influencing Early Adoption Of New Food Products In Louisiana And Southeast Texas," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 28(3), pages 1-10, October.
    9. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: evidence from a consumer survey," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1300, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    10. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1994. "Consumer Concerns about Nutrition: Opportunities for the Food Sector," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309723, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Rimal, Arbindra & Fletcher, Stanley M. & McWatters, Kay H., 2000. "Nutrition Considerations In Food Selection," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16.
    12. Moon, Wanki & Florkowski, Wojciech J. & A. Resurreccion, Anna V. & Paraskova, Pavlina & R. Beuchat, Larry & Jordanov, Jordan & Chinnan, Manjeet S., 1998. "Consumer concerns about nutritional attributes in a transition economy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 357-369, October.
    13. Frazão, Elizabeth & Allshouse, Jane E., 1996. "Size and Growth of the Nutritionally Improved Foods Market," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309836, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Riethmuller, Paul C., 1995. "Recent Developments in Food Retailing in the United States and Australia," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(01), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John, 1999. "Predicting Willingness-To-Pay A Premium For Organically Grown Fresh Produce," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 1-10, July.
    16. Traore, Breima & Traore, Anna, 2023. "Determinants of Household Food Expenditure in Mali: A Quintile Regression Approach," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 11(1), January.
    17. Iskow, Julie & Kolodinsky, Jane & Russo, David, 1994. "THE EFFECTS OF PROMOTION ON THE DEMAND FOR SPECIALTY PRODUCTS AND THEIR MASS MARKET COUNTERPARTS: An Econometric Analysis of the Canadian and U.S. Maple Syrup Markets," Promotion in the Marketing Mix: What Works, Where and Why, April 28-29, 1994, Toronto, Canada 279595, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    18. Lara Cockx & Nathalie Francken & Hannah Pieters, 2015. "Food and nutrition security in the European Union: Overview and case studies," FOODSECURE Working papers 31, LEI Wageningen UR.
    19. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John & Adelaja, Adesoji O., 2001. "Predicting Willingness-To-Pay A Premium For Integrated Pest Management Produce: A Logistic Approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-9, October.
    20. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John & Adelaja, Adesoji O., 1998. "Predicting Consumer Risk Aversions to Synthetic Pesticide Residues: A Logistic Analysis," P Series 36740, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.