IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122993.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supermarket Bakery Consumers: Attitudes, Preferences, Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • McLaughlin, Edward W.
  • Hawkes, Gerard F.
  • Park, Kristen
  • Perosio, Debra J.

Abstract

For at least a decade, supermarket operators have turned increasingly to fresh foods for the strategic direction of their business by remodeling existing stores and building new stores to feature and emphasize produce, the delicatessen, the bakery, and other perishable departments. These departments have been the fastest growing and offer the greatest future sales potential as consumer demand for "fresh" and "ready to eat" prepared foods continues to grow. Despite these prospects, little is actually known about how consumers perceive and respond to product offerings and retailer initiatives in perishable departments. The objective ofthis report is to shed light on consumer attitudes and behavior with respect to one of the major supermarket perishable departments: the bakery. This report is based on a study which incorporated both primary and secondary sources of data (details in Section II). The primary data were collected through consumer surveys conducted nationwide by telephone and in-person at supermarkets in several regional market areas. A total of 700 consumers were surveyed. Additional primary data and insights were gathered through personal interviews with key supermarket bakery executives. Secondary data were gathered from trade reports, academic journals, and previously published research. The empirical results and analyses presented in Section III include such key findings as: • consumers consider convenience the most important reason for shopping supermarket bakeries, • the main reason some consumers do not buy baked goods in supermarkets is "freshness," which is perceived to be better at local bakeries, • consumer awareness of health and nutrition concerns is greater than consumer knowledge about these issues, • about half of consumers are familiar with the United States Department of Agriculture's Food Guide Pyramid, but the percentage varies greatly by age with the youngest shoppers being most familiar, • consumers rate many of the most popular retailer promotional efforts as uninfluential factors in their purchase decisions, and • price plays only a minor role in bakery purchase decisions for most consumers. The implications of these findings and others are discussed in Section IV which also discusses opportunities for the supermarket bakery industry to respond to the consumer characteristics and issues identified in this study. The results present many marketing challenges for supermarket bakery managers as consumers increasingly make bakery decisions based on knowledge of health, nutrition, and other issues.

Suggested Citation

  • McLaughlin, Edward W. & Hawkes, Gerard F. & Park, Kristen & Perosio, Debra J., 1995. "Supermarket Bakery Consumers: Attitudes, Preferences, Behaviors," Research Bulletins 122993, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122993
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122993/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb9501.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smallwood, David M. & Blaylock, James R., 1994. "Fiber: Not Enough of a Good Thing?," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    2. Rose, Donald, 1994. "Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Weight Status," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    3. Shaw, Anne & Davis, Carole, 1994. "The Dietary Guidelines Focus on Reducing Excessive Intakes," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    4. Tippett, Katherine S. & Goldman, Joseph D., 1994. "Diets More Healthful, But Still Fall Short of Dietary Guidelines," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 1998. "Assessing Concerns About The Fat Content Of Meats Among Primary Grocery Shoppers In Louisiana And Southeast Texas," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 1-6, February.
    2. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1995. "The American Diet: Health and Economic Consequences," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309727, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1994. "Consumer Concerns about Nutrition: Opportunities for the Food Sector," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309723, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Frazão, Elizabeth & Allshouse, Jane E., 1996. "Size and Growth of the Nutritionally Improved Foods Market," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309836, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Chen, Kevin & Ali, Murad & Veeman, Michele & Unterschultz, Jim & Le, Theresa, 2002. "Relative Importance Rankings for Pork Attributes by Asian-Origin Consumers in California: Applying an Ordered Probit Model to a Choice-Based Sample," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 67-79, April.
    6. Binkley, James K., 1997. "The Relation Between Dietary Change and Rising U.S. Obesity," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35896, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Variyam, Jayachandran N. & Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David M., 1998. "Informational Effects Of Nutrient Intake Determinants On Cholesterol Consumption," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 1999. "Toward An Understanding Of Consumers' Perceptions Of Food Labels," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17.
    9. Hui, Jianguo & McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E. & Jones, Dewitt, 1995. "An Empirical Investigation Of Importance Ratings Of Meat Attributes By Louisiana And Texas Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 1998. "Consumer Characteristics Associated With Low Fat, Low Cholesterol Foods," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9.
    11. Nayga Jr., Rodolfo M. & Capps Jr., Oral, 1999. "US consumers' perceptions of the importance of following the US dietary guidelines," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 553-564, October.
    12. Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Lazaridis, Panagiotis & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 2006. "Food involvement and food purchasing behaviour," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10048, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Saltos, Etta & Davis, Carole & Welsh, Susan & Guthrie, Joanne & Tamaki, Junko, 1994. "Using Food Labels to Follow the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: A Reference," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309722, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 2001. "An Analysis Of Nutritional Label Use In The Southern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-5, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.