IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/341554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative assessment of the deficit in consumption of milk and meat products by the population of Ukraine as a result of food losses and waste

Author

Listed:
  • Kotykova, Olena
  • Pohorielova, Olena
  • Babych, Mykola

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of our study is to assess the extent to which food losses and waste affect the level of deficit in the consumption of milk and meat products by the population of Ukraine, which will allow us to identify the regions of Ukraine for which measures and policies to reduce food losses and waste should be developed. Methodology / approach. The empirical research was conducted using primary and secondary data. Primary data were used to calculate food losses and waste according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) methodology. Secondary data were used for correlation and regression analysis. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted for each of the six types of products: meat and milk. Factorial features are food losses and waste per capita. The result feature of the correlation and regression analysis is the share of consumption deficit resulting from food losses and waste. The sample was formed based on data from 24 regions of Ukraine. Results. According to the results of the correlation and regression analysis, the assumption of the absence of a relationship is not confirmed; all factors are significant. It has been proven that food losses and waste of milk and meat are a significant factor in the formation of a deficit in the consumption of milk and meat by the population of Ukraine. It was determined that milk losses and waste have a somewhat higher impact on the deficit of product consumption than meat losses and waste. It was established that the share of the deficit in milk and meat consumption, which arises as a result of food losses and waste, is higher in those areas that traditionally specialise in the production of livestock products. The feasibility of developing and implementing differentiated measures to reduce the deficit of milk and meat consumption in certain regions is substantiated. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, the degree of impact of food losses and waste of milk and meat production on the deficit of consumption of these products by the population of Ukraine has been scientifically proven and quantified. Practical value / implications. The results of this empirical study are the basis for the development of state and regional programmes and the implementation of the necessary actions to achieve Sustainable Development Goals 2 and 12 (SDG 2, 12) in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotykova, Olena & Pohorielova, Olena & Babych, Mykola, 2024. "Quantitative assessment of the deficit in consumption of milk and meat products by the population of Ukraine as a result of food losses and waste," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:341554
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341554/files/4_Kotykova_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manoj Dora & Joshua Wesana & Xavier Gellynck & Nitin Seth & Bidit Dey & Hans Steur, 2020. "Importance of sustainable operations in food loss: evidence from the Belgian food processing industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 47-72, July.
    2. Brancoli, Pedro & Rousta, Kamran & Bolton, Kim, 2017. "Life cycle assessment of supermarket food waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 39-46.
    3. Małgorzata Karwowska & Sylwia Łaba & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "Food Loss and Waste in Meat Sector—Why the Consumption Stage Generates the Most Losses?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Buzby, Jean C. & Hyman, Jeffrey, 2012. "Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 561-570.
    5. Clapp, Jennifer & Moseley, William G. & Burlingame, Barbara & Termine, Paola, 2022. "Viewpoint: The case for a six-dimensional food security framework," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Olena Kotykova & Mykola Babych, 2019. "Limitations in availability of food in Ukraine as a result of loss and waste," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 153-172, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eriksson, Mattias & Ghosh, Ranjan & Mattsson, Lisa & Ismatov, Alisher, 2017. "Take-back agreements in the perspective of food waste generation at the supplier-retailer interface," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 83-93.
    2. Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann & Michał Gazdecki & Krystyna Rejman & Joanna Kobus-Cisowska & Sylwia Łaba & Robert Łaba, 2020. "How to Prevent Bread Losses in the Baking and Confectionery Industry?—Measurement, Causes, Management and Prevention," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Florin Nenciu & Iustina Stanciulescu & Horia Vlad & Andrei Gabur & Ovidiu Leonard Turcu & Tiberiu Apostol & Valentin Nicolae Vladut & Diana Mariana Cocarta & Constantin Stan, 2022. "Decentralized Processing Performance of Fruit and Vegetable Waste Discarded from Retail, Using an Automated Thermophilic Composting Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Lorenzo Compagnucci & Alessio Cavicchi & Francesca Spigarelli & Lorenza Natali, 2018. "A multi-stakeholder attempt to address food waste: The case of Wellfood Action EU project," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(3), pages 503-528.
    5. Małgorzata Karwowska & Sylwia Łaba & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "Food Loss and Waste in Meat Sector—Why the Consumption Stage Generates the Most Losses?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Cicatiello, Clara & Franco, Silvio & Pancino, Barbara & Blasi, Emanuele & Falasconi, Luca, 2017. "The dark side of retail food waste: Evidences from in-store data," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 273-281.
    7. Rosalinda Nicastro & Petronia Carillo, 2021. "Food Loss and Waste Prevention Strategies from Farm to Fork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Sebastian K. Stankiewicz & Rafael Auras & Susan Selke, 2019. "Modeling American Household Fluid Milk Consumption and their Resulting Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Krishna Bahadur KC & Iftekharul Haque & Alexander F. Legwegoh & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2016. "Strategies to Reduce Food Loss in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2021. "Does dietary knowledge affect household food waste in the developing economy of China?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    12. Jones, R.E. & Speight, R.E. & Blinco, J.L. & O'Hara, I.M., 2022. "Biorefining within food loss and waste frameworks: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Ferrazzi, Giovanni & Ventura, Vera & Balzaretti, Claudia Maria & Castrica, Marta, 2019. "Exploring the Landscape of Innovative “from Food to Feed” Strategies: A Review," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(03), July.
    14. Johnson, Lisa K. & Dunning, Rebecca D. & Gunter, Chris C. & Dara Bloom, J. & Boyette, Michael D. & Creamer, Nancy G., 2018. "Field measurement in vegetable crops indicates need for reevaluation of on-farm food loss estimates in North America," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 136-142.
    15. Bachewe Fantu & Minten Bart & Seyoum Taffesse Alemayehu & Pauw Karl & Cameron Alethia & Genye Endaylalu Tirsit, 2020. "Farmers’ Grain Storage and Losses in Ethiopia," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Lee, Deishin & Sönmez, Erkut & Gómez, Miguel I. & Fan, Xiaoli, 2017. "Combining two wrongs to make two rights: Mitigating food insecurity and food waste through gleaning operations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 40-52.
    17. Dusoruth, Vaneesha, 2018. "Household Food Waste Generation and Organics Recycling: Too Time Consuming or for the Better [Public] Good?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274132, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Cristina Chiarella & Yulia Lamoureaux & Alda A. F. Pires & Rachel Surls & Robert Bennaton & Julia Soelen Kim & Suzanne Grady & Thais M. Ramos & Vikram Koundinya & Erin DiCaprio, 2023. "A preliminary assessment of food policy obstacles in California’s produce recovery networks," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1239-1258, September.
    19. Govindan, K. & Jafarian, A. & Khodaverdi, R. & Devika, K., 2014. "Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-28.
    20. Saman Attiq & Ka Yin Chau & Shahid Bashir & Muhammad Danish Habib & Rauf I. Azam & Wing-Keung Wong, 2021. "Sustainability of Household Food Waste Reduction: A Fresh Insight on Youth’s Emotional and Cognitive Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:341554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.