IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v21y2019i51p462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entomofagy – A Viable Solution for Supporting Food Security

Author

Listed:
  • Violeta Elena Simion

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Rocsana ?oniº Bucea-Manea

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Amfim Adriana

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Oliva Maria Dourado Martins

    (UDCE of Instituto Politécnico de IPT)

  • Blagica Sekovska

    (University St. Cyril and Methodius)

  • Irina Dijmãrescu

    (Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children Grigore Alexandrescu)

Abstract

Entomophagy or the practice of eating insects has been known and practiced for millennia by people around the world, and being taken into account in countries where insect consumption is considered to be exotic behavior or the evolution of society begins to impose it. Food security is a prerequisite for the welfare of the population and can be achieved by appropriately capitalizing on the natural resources available to Romania’s agriculture. Its approach and development must be in two directions, strongly interrelated with each other, namely a quantitative one and a qualitative one. The quantitative aspect regards as a matter of priority the provision of the necessary amount of food to meet the physiological needs of a reference population, while the quality aspect focuses on the nutritional value of foods consumed by the population so that its health is not affected or compromised. Considering the two above-mentioned aspects, we consider that the practice of consuming edible insects presents several advantages, both quantitative and qualitative, which should not be neglected in ensuring food security. Innovation must be implemented throughout the agri-food chain, and entomophagy can be one of the viable solutions to support food security. In order to emphasize the importance of entomophagy in ensuring food security, the paper brings to the fore a series os aspects regarding the review of the scientific literature in the field, the nutritional value of insects, the impact of insect food production on the environment, and consumer attitudes towards entomophagy. At the end of the paper, a small attempt is made to assess to what extent Romanian consumers are prepared to accept edible insects in their food.

Suggested Citation

  • Violeta Elena Simion & Rocsana ?oniº Bucea-Manea & Amfim Adriana & Oliva Maria Dourado Martins & Blagica Sekovska & Irina Dijmãrescu, 2019. "Entomofagy – A Viable Solution for Supporting Food Security," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(51), pages 462-462.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2826.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zong, Jian & Zhu, Maoran & Xie, Wei, 2024. "Dietary shift brings non-ignorable cross-border health and environment change," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344345, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    2. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Galina Hale & Vlad Onescu & Ritesh Bhangale, 2024. "Pace of Adoption of Alternatives to Animal-Source Foods and Climate Goals," NBER Working Papers 32736, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Florén, Britta & Amani, Pegah & Davis, Jennifer, 2017. "Climate Database Facilitating Climate Smart Meal Planning for the Public Sector in Sweden," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    5. Castro, P. & Pedroso, R. & Lautenbach, S. & Vicens, R., 2020. "Farmland abandonment in Rio de Janeiro: Underlying and contributory causes of an announced development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Nissan, Hannah & Simmons, Will & Downs, Shauna M., 2022. "Building climate-sensitive nutrition programmes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113561, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2020. "Changes in Dairy Products Value Chain in Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Adrian Muller & Eduardo Aguilera & Colin Skinner & Andreas Gattinger, 2016. "Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Comment on the McGee study," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(4), pages 943-947, December.
    9. Elinor Hallström & Quentin Gee & Peter Scarborough & David A. Cleveland, 2017. "A healthier US diet could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from both the food and health care systems," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 199-212, May.
    10. Xueru Zhang & Wei Song & Jingtao Wang & Bo Wen & Dazhi Yang & Shiliang Jiang & Yanbin Wu, 2020. "Analysis on Decoupling between Urbanization Level and Urbanization Quality in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Romain Espinosa & Anis Nassar, 2021. "The Acceptability of Food Policies," Post-Print halshs-03210654, HAL.
    12. Kousaku Ohta & Tatsuya Kawaoka & Masatoshi Funabashi, 2020. "Secondary Metabolite Differences between Naturally Grown and Conventional Coarse Green Tea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Birgit Kopainsky & Anita Frehner & Adrian Müller, 2020. "Sustainable and healthy diets: Synergies and trade‐offs in Switzerland," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 908-927, November.
    14. Daniel Magnone & Vahid J. Niasar & Alexander F. Bouwman & Arthur H. W. Beusen & Sjoerd E. A. T. M. Zee & Sheida Z. Sattari, 2022. "The impact of phosphorus on projected Sub-Saharan Africa food security futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. K. Viktoria Stein & Thomas E. Dorner, 2024. "From Health-in-All-Policies to Climate-in-All-Policies: Using the Synergies between Health Promotion and Climate Protection to Take Action," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Wu, L. & Harris, P. & Misselbrook, T.H. & Lee, M.R.F., 2022. "Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Raquel Rosas & Filipa Pimenta & Isabel Leal & Ralf Schwarzer, 2022. "FOODLIT-Trial: Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Digital Intervention to Promote Food Literacy and Sustainability Behaviours in Adults Using the Health Action Process Approach and the Behaviour Chan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Adam A. Prag & Christian B. Henriksen, 2020. "Transition from Animal-Based to Plant-Based Food Production to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture—The Case of Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Bonnet, Céline & Coinon, Marine, 2024. "Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Coralie KERSULEC & Luc DOYEN, 2022. "From fork to fish: The role of consumer preferences on the sustainability of fisheries," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2022-10, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entomophagy; food security; edible insects; Romanian consumers.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.