IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jetheo/v7y1974i4p388-410.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim

Citations

RePEc Biblio mentions

As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography for Economics:
  1. > Economics, Ethics, and Culture > Social justice > Liberal theories > Libertarianism and rights

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Herrade Igersheim, 2006. "Libéralisme de la liberté versus libéralisme du bonheur. Le cas du paradoxe libéral-parétien," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(3), pages 389-398.
  2. Robert Sugden, 2021. "Normative economics without preferences," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 68(1), pages 5-19, March.
  3. Ben McQuillin & Robert Sugden, 2011. "The representation of alienable and inalienable rights: games in transition function form," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(4), pages 683-706, October.
  4. Kretz, Claudio, 2021. "Consistent rights on property spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  5. Bezalel Peleg & Ron Holzman, 2017. "Representations of Political Power Structures by Strategically Stable Game Forms: A Survey," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
  6. Herrade Igersheim, 2013. "Invoking a Cartesian product structure on social states," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 463-477, April.
  7. van Hees, Martin, 1999. "Liberalism, Efficiency, and Stability: Some Possibility Results," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 294-309, October.
  8. E. Guzzini & A. Palestrini, 2012. "Coase theorem and exchangeable rights in non-cooperative games," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 83-100, February.
  9. Roth, Timothy P., 1999. "Consequentialism, rights, and the new social welfare theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 95-109.
  10. Edward Green, 1982. "Equilibrium and efficiency under pure entitlement systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 185-212, January.
  11. John Aldrich, 1977. "The dilemma of a paretian liberal: Some consequences of Sen's theorem," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-21, June.
  12. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2014. "Representation of constitutions under incomplete information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(2), pages 279-302, October.
  13. Berrens, Robert P. & Polasky, Stephen, 1995. "The Paretian Liberal Paradox and ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 45-56, July.
  14. Ruvin Gekker, 1992. "On the strategic inconsistency of the meta-rights approach," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 265-275, October.
  15. Christian Seidl, 1986. "The impossibility of nondictatorial tolerance," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 211-225, December.
  16. Perote-Pena, Juan & Piggins, Ashley, 2005. "Pareto efficiency with spatial rights," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 265-283, April.
  17. Caroline Berden & Hans Peters, 2006. "On the Effect of Risk Aversion in Bimatrix Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 359-370, June.
  18. Chetan Dave & Stefan Dodds, 2012. "Nosy Preferences, Benevolence, and Efficiency," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 78(3), pages 878-894, January.
  19. Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2013. "Bezalel Peleg and Hans Peters: Strategic Social Choice. Stable Representations of Constitutions, Studies in choice and welfare, Springer, 2010, 154 pp," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00666816, HAL.
  20. Christian Seidl, 1990. "On the impossibility of a generalization of the libertarian resolution of the liberal paradox," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 71-88, February.
  21. Stanley Reiter, 2001. "Interdependent Preferences and Groups of Agents," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 3(1), pages 27-67, January.
  22. Roy Gardner, 1980. "The strategic inconsistency of Paretian liberalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 241-252, January.
  23. S. Subramanian, 2010. "Liberty, equality, and impossibility: some general results in the space of 'soft' preferences," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 325-341.
  24. Alessandro Morselli, 2021. "Individual decisions and collective choices in the history of economic thought," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 77-96,97-11.
  25. Biung-Ghi Ju, 2010. "Individual powers and social consent: an axiomatic approach," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(4), pages 571-596, April.
  26. Massimiliano Vatiero, 2023. "Extending Amartya Sen’s Paretian Liberal Paradox to a Firm’s Hierarchy," DEM Working Papers 2023/3, Department of Economics and Management.
  27. Maurice Salles, 2006. "La théorie du choix social : de l'importance des mathématiques," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 200617, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
  28. Alessandra F. Lütz & Marco Antonio Amaral & Ian Braga & Lucas Wardil, 2023. "Invasion of Optimal Social Contracts," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, May.
  29. Roth, Timothy P., 2000. "Efficiency: An inappropriate guide to structural transformation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 109-126.
  30. Kotaro Suzumura, 2002. "Introduction to social choice and welfare," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 442, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  31. Wulf Gaertner, 2023. "On the possibility of Paretian liberalism: a comment," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 361-363, August.
  32. Keith L. Dougherty & Julian Edward, 2022. "The effect of unconditional preferences on Sen’s paradox," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 427-447, October.
  33. Peleg, Bezalel & Peters, Hans & Storcken, Ton, 2002. "Nash consistent representation of constitutions: a reaction to the Gibbard paradox," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 267-287, March.
  34. Suzumura, Kotaro & 鈴村, 興太郎 & スズムラ, コウタロウ, 2007. "Choice, Opportunities, and Procedures: Collected Papers of Kotaro Suzumura. Part IV, Individual rights and Social Welfare," Discussion Paper 301, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
  35. Peter Bernholz, 1975. "Is a paretian liberal really impossible," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 69-73, September.
  36. S. Subramanian, 2006. "A sort of Paretian liberalism," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 311-324.
  37. Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2013. "Bezalel Peleg and Hans Peters: Strategic social choice. Stable representations of constitutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 631-634, February.
  38. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoit M., 2012. "Choix social et partage équitable : Une analyse mathématique a posteriori des élections législatives et présidentielles de 2006 et 2011 en RDC [Social choice and fair sharing: An a posteriori mathe," MPRA Paper 64915, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  39. Enrico Guzzini, 2010. "Efficient Nash equilibria, individual rights and Pareto principle: an impossibility result," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(1), pages 103-114.
  40. Piacquadio Paolo G. & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni & Acocella Nicola, 2009. "A simple framework for investigating the properties of policy games," wp.comunite 0059, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
  41. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2013. "Choix social et préférence collective : analyse a posteriori de l’élection présidentielle de 2011 en République Démocratique du Congo [Social choice and collective value: A posteriori analysis of 2," MPRA Paper 64538, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jan 2015.
  42. Roy Gardner, 1983. "Variation of the electorate: Veto and purge," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 237-247, January.
  43. Peleg, Bezalel & Peters, Hans, 2009. "Nash consistent representation of effectivity functions through lottery models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 503-515, March.
  44. Aldo Montesano, 2022. "The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal, Game Theory and Negotiation," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 8(3), pages 719-732, November.
  45. Gardner, Roy, 1980. "Game-Theoretic Remarks on Gibbard's Libertarian Social Choice Functions," ISU General Staff Papers 198001010800001024, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  46. A. Hamlin, 1985. "The political economy of constitutional federalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 187-195, January.
  47. Walter Bossert & Marc Fleurbaey, 2015. "An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(1), pages 179-208, January.
  48. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:103-114 is not listed on IDEAS
  49. Friedrich Breyer & Roy Gardner, 1980. "Liberal paradox, game equilibrium, and Gibbard optimum," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 469-481, January.
  50. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & Mehmet S. Ismail, 2021. "No-harm principle, rationality, and Pareto optimality in games," Papers 2101.10723, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
  51. Martin van Hees, 2000. "Negative Freedom And The Liberal Paradoxes," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(3), pages 335-352, August.
  52. Valentina Erasmo, 2023. "The Impossibility of a Paretian (Il)liberal. A Historical Review Around Sen?s Liberalism (1970-1996)," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 91-116.
  53. Marc Fleurbaey & Bertil Tungodden & Howard F. Chang, 2003. "Any Non-welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: A Comment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(6), pages 1382-1386, December.
  54. Wulf Gaertner, 1986. "Pareto, interdependent rights exercising and strategic behaviour," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 79-98, December.
  55. John W. Patty & Elizabeth Maggie Penn, 2019. "A defense of Arrow’s independence of irrelevant alternatives," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 145-164, April.
  56. zhao, guo & Chai, Yingming, 2024. "A Sufficient Condition for Weakly Acyclic games with Applications," MPRA Paper 120789, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  57. Heap, Shaun Hargreaves & Ismail, Mehmet, 2021. "Liberalism, rationality, and Pareto optimality," SocArXiv mgqh7, Center for Open Science.
  58. Cato, Susumu, 2013. "Remarks on Suzumura consistent collective choice rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 40-47.
  59. Amaresh Das & Biruk Alemayehu, 2013. "The Game Theory, Morality and the ’Game of Life’," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(3), pages 39-47, March.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.