IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cup/bjposi/v16y1986i01p57-85_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Jung-In Jo & Hyun Jin Choi, 2019. "Enigmas of grievances about inequality: Effects of attitudes toward inequality and government redistribution on protest participation," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 348-368, December.
  2. Rucht, Dieter, 1994. "Öffentlichkeit als Mobilisierungsfaktor für soziale Bewegungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 337-358.
  3. Silke Roth, 2018. "Introduction: Contemporary Counter-Movements in the Age of Brexit and Trump," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 496-506, June.
  4. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
  5. Cornelia Woll & Alvaro Artigas, 2007. "When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: The impact on business–government relations in international trade politics," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 121-138, June.
  6. Geels, Frank W., 2010. "Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 495-510, May.
  7. Zorn, Annika, 2002. "Wie die Löffelente bis nach Brüssel kam - oder: Wie sucht man nach europäischen Bewegungen?," Discussion Papers, Working Group Political Communication and Mobilization P 02-701, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  8. Huang, Ying & Porter, Alan L. & Cunningham, Scott W. & Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Liu, Jianhua & Zhu, Donghua, 2018. "A technology delivery system for characterizing the supply side of technology emergence: Illustrated for Big Data & Analytics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 165-176.
  9. Satyapriya Rout & Annu Yudik, 2021. "Environmental Movements in North-East India: Political Opportunity Structure and Movement Success," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 26(2), pages 226-246, December.
  10. Edward N. Muller & Erich Weede, 1994. "Theories of Rebellion," Rationality and Society, , vol. 6(1), pages 40-57, January.
  11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
  12. Kazenin, Konstantin (Казенин, Константин) & Koroleva, Maria (Королева, Мария), 2018. "Sociology of Social Movements – Main Approaches [Социология Общественных Движений – Основные Подходы]," Working Papers 061802, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  13. Brandon Ives & Jacob S. Lewis, 2020. "From Rallies to Riots: Why Some Protests Become Violent," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(5), pages 958-986, May.
  14. Watanabe, Tsutomu, 2007. "International comparison on the occurrence of social movements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 806-812, July.
  15. Tim Marshall & Richard Cowell, 2016. "Infrastructure, planning and the command of time," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1843-1866, December.
  16. Zack W. Almquist & Benjamin E. Bagozzi, 2019. "Using Radical Environmentalist Texts to Uncover Network Structure and Network Features," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 905-960, November.
  17. Ćurko Hrvoje, 2016. "Can Institutions of Autonomy Become Potentially “Subversive Institutions”?," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 22(76), pages 52-84, October.
  18. Doowon Suh, 2012. "Intricacies of Social Movement Outcome Research and beyond: “How can you Tell†Social Movements Prompt Changes?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(4), pages 92-102, November.
  19. Galindo-Silva, Hector, 2021. "Political openness and armed conflict: Evidence from local councils in Colombia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
  20. Newton, Kenneth & Giebler, Heiko, 2008. "Patterns of participation: Political and social participation in 22 nations," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Democracy and Democratization SP IV 2008-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  21. Zürn, Michael & Heupel, Monika, 2017. "Human Rights Protection in International Organizations: An Introduction," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-39.
  22. Isabelle Anguelovski, 2015. "Tactical developments for achieving just and sustainable neighborhoods: the role of community-based coalitions and bottom-to-bottom networks in street, technical, and funder activism," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 703-725, August.
  23. Lori M. Poloni-Staudinger, 2008. "The Domestic Opportunity Structure and Supranational Activity," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(4), pages 531-558, December.
  24. Lars Sorge & Anne Neumann & Christian von Hirschhausen & Ben Wealer, 2019. "Nuclear Power, Democracy, Development, and Nuclear Warheads: Determinants for Introducing Nuclear Power," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1811, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  25. Delik Hudalah & Haryo Winarso & Johan Woltjer, 2010. "Planning by Opportunity: An Analysis of Periurban Environmental Conflicts in Indonesia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2254-2269, September.
  26. Ganz, Marshall Louis & Skocpol, Theda & Munson, Ziad, 2000. "A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States," Scholarly Articles 12641806, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
  27. Matthias Brachert & Christoph Hornych, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Opportunity and the Formation of the Photovoltaic Industry in Eastern Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1460, European Regional Science Association.
  28. Matt Patterson, 2012. "The Role of the Public Institution in Iconic Architectural Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3289-3305, November.
  29. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
  30. Kimberly Turner, 2023. "A win or a flop? Measuring mass protest successfulness in authoritarian settings," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(1), pages 107-123, January.
  31. Jale Tosun & Aurel Croissant, 2016. "Policy Diffusion: A Regime-sensitive Conceptual Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(4), pages 534-540, November.
  32. Richard Cowell & Susan Owens, 2010. "Revisiting … Governing Space: Planning Reform and the Politics of Sustainability," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(6), pages 952-957, December.
  33. Kelly, Brendan D., 2008. "The emerging mental health strategy of the European Union: A multi-level work-in-progress," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 60-70, January.
  34. Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "Von Lefort zu Mouffe. Populismus als Moment und Grenze radikaler Demokratie [From Lefort to Mouffe: Populism as moment and limit of radical democracy]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 767-786.
  35. Roller, Edeltraud & Weßels, Bernhard, 1996. "Contexts of political protest in Western democracies: Political organization and modernity," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 96-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  36. Bornstein, Nicholas & Lanz, Bruno, 2008. "Voting on the environment: Price or ideology? Evidence from Swiss referendums," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 430-440, October.
  37. Michaël Mangeon & Frédérique Pallez, 2018. "Supplely regulating nuclear risks: The origins of a French exception (1960-1985)," Post-Print hal-01904855, HAL.
  38. Cornelia Woll & Alvaro Artigas, 2007. "When Trade Liberalization Turns into Regulatory Reform: The Impact on Business-Government Relations in International Trade Politics," Post-Print hal-01071209, HAL.
  39. Kriesi, Hanspeter, 2001. "Die Rolle der Öffentlichkeit im politischen Entscheidungsprozess: Ein konzeptueller Rahmen für ein international vergleichendes Forschungsprojekt," Discussion Papers, Working Group Political Communication and Mobilization P 01-701, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  40. Waleed A. Jami & Clayton Peoples, 2022. "Political opportunity, democracy, and 40 years of protest, 1981–2020: A cross‐national analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(6), pages 1440-1458, November.
  41. Justin L. Schupp, 2016. "Just where does local food live? Assessing farmers’ markets in the United States," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(4), pages 827-841, December.
  42. Manlio Cinalli, 2003. "Socio‐politically polarized contexts, urban mobilization and the environmental movement: a comparative study of two campaigns of protest in Northern Ireland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 158-177, March.
  43. Sierra, Jazmin & Hochstetler, Kathryn, 2017. "Transnational activist networks and rising powers: transparency and environmental concerns in the Brazilian National Development Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 79089, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  44. Michelsen, Claus & El-Shagi, Makram & Rosenschon, Sebastian, 2016. "The diffusion of "green'' buildings in the housing market: empirics on the long run effects of energy efficiency regulation," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145534, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  45. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," Post-Print hal-01021182, HAL.
  46. Henry, Laura, 2001. "The Greening of Grassroots Democracy? The Russian Environmental Movement, Foreign Aid, and Democratization," Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies, Working Paper Series qt8dz7v28n, Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, UC Berkeley.
  47. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01021182, HAL.
  48. Sébastien Mena & Daniel Waeger, 2014. "Activism for Corporate Responsibility: Conceptualizing Private Regulation Opportunity Structures," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1091-1117, November.
  49. Alison Harcourt, 2013. "Participatory Gains and Policy Effectiveness: The Open Method of Co-ordination Information Society," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 667-683, July.
  50. Ahmet Conker, 2016. "The Power Struggle In The Layer Of Transnational Hydropolitics: The Case Of The Ilisu Dam Project," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(4), pages 14-34.
  51. Scherhaufer, Patrick & Klittich, Philipp & Buzogány, Aron, 2021. "Between illegal protests and legitimate resistance. Civil disobedience against energy infrastructures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
  52. Sergio Belda-Miquel & Jordi Peris Blanes & Alexandre Frediani, 2016. "Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 321-339, March.
  53. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
  54. Hess, David J., 2020. "Incumbent-led transitions and civil society: Autonomous vehicle policy and consumer organizations in the United States," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
  55. Xiaojie Zhang & Lili Wang, 2022. "Factors Contributing to Citizens’ Participation in COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: An Integrated Model Based on Theory of Planned Behavior, Norm Activation Model, and Political Opportunity S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
  56. Richard Cowell & Geraint Ellis & Fionnguala Sherry-Brennan & Peter A Strachan & David Toke, 2017. "Sub-national government and pathways to sustainable energy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(7), pages 1139-1155, November.
  57. Gerhards, Jürgen & Neidhardt, Friedhelm, 1990. "Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: The Public and the Social Movement FS III 90-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  58. Tesoka, Sabrina, 1999. "Judicial politics in the European Union: Its impact on national opportunity structures for gender equality," MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  59. John Gaffney, 2003. "The French Fifth Republic as an Opportunity Structure: A Neo‐institutional and Cultural Approach to the Study of Leadership Politics," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(4), pages 686-705, December.
  60. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
  61. Patibandla Srikant, 2009. "Koodankulam Anti-Nuclear Movement: A Struggle for Alternative Development?," Working Papers 232, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
  62. Coppens, Tom & Van Dooren, Wouter & Thijssen, Peter, 2018. "Public opposition and the neighborhood effect: How social interaction explains protest against a large infrastructure project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 633-640.
  63. Clare Saunders, 2009. "It's Not Just Structural: Social Movements are not Homogenous Responses to Structural Features, but Networks shaped by Organisational Strategies and Status," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(1), pages 26-41, January.
  64. Livia Johannesson & Noomi Weinryb, 2021. "How to blame and make a difference: perceived responsibility and policy consequences in two Swedish pro-migrant campaigns," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 41-62, March.
  65. Richard Cowell & Mick Lennon, 2014. "The Utilisation of Environmental Knowledge in Land-Use Planning: Drawing Lessons for an Ecosystem Services Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(2), pages 263-282, April.
  66. Karen Stenner & Zim Nwokora, 2015. "Current and Future Friends of the Earth: Assessing Cross-National Theories of Environmental Attitudes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
  67. Kovács, Anna & Luckner, Katharina & Sekuła, Anna & Kantorowicz, Jarosław, 2024. "Beyond courts: Does strategic litigation affect climate change policy support?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  68. Luis Diestre & Juan Santaló, 2020. "Why Do Firms Suffer Differently from Input Stigmatization? The Costs of Removing Stigmatized Inputs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 47-66, January.
  69. Cornelia Woll & Alvaro Artigas, 2007. "When Trade Liberalization Turns into Regulatory Reform: The Impact on Business-Government Relations in International Trade Politics," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01071209, HAL.
  70. Fremeth, Adam R. & Holburn, Guy L. F. & Piazza, Alessandro, 2021. "Activist Protest Spillovers into the Regulatory Domain: Theory and Evidence from the U.S. Nuclear Power Generation Industry," OSF Preprints s39h2, Center for Open Science.
  71. Joly, Philippe, 2018. "Generations and protest in Eastern Germany: Between revolution and apathy," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Democracy and Democratization SP V 2018-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  72. Anna Pacześniak & Maria Wincławska, 2024. "Migrants’ Political Participation and Representation in Poland: What Do Political Parties Have to Offer?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
  73. Rucht, Dieter, 1991. "Soziale Bewegungen, Gegenbewegungen und Staat: der Abtreibungskonflikt in den USA, Frankreich und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 31-42.
  74. Jakob Anton Luger, 2015. "Ein neues Werkzeug: Die Europäische Bürgerinitiative am Fallbeispiel von „right2water“," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 4, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
  75. Joly, Philippe, 2018. "Generations and Protest in Eastern Germany: Between Revolution and Apathy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(6), pages 704-737.
  76. Neumann, Anne & Sorge, Lars & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Wealer, Ben, 2020. "Democratic quality and nuclear power: Reviewing the global determinants for the introduction of nuclear energy in 166 countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63.
  77. Rucht, Dieter, 1990. "Campaigns, skirmishes and battles: anti-nuclear movements in the USA, France and West-Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 193-222.
  78. Maarten Johannes Bezouw & Anastasia Garyfallou & Ioana-Elena Oană & Sebastien Rojon, 2019. "A methodology for cross-national comparative focus group research: illustrations from discussions about political protest," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 2719-2739, November.
  79. Scheer, Dirk & Konrad, Wilfried & Wassermann, Sandra, 2017. "The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 89-100.
  80. Wu, Jing & Chang, I-Shin & Yilihamu, Qimanguli & Zhou, Yu, 2017. "Study on the practice of public participation in environmental impact assessment by environmental non-governmental organizations in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 186-200.
  81. Zachrisson, Anna & Beland Lindahl, Karin, 2019. "Political opportunity and mobilization: The evolution of a Swedish mining-sceptical movement," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
  82. Solomon, Barry D. & Krishna, Karthik, 2011. "The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7422-7431.
  83. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
  84. Winkelmann, Ricarda & Donges, Jonathan F. & Smith, E. Keith & Milkoreit, Manjana & Eder, Christina & Heitzig, Jobst & Katsanidou, Alexia & Wiedermann, Marc & Wunderling, Nico & Lenton, Timothy M., 2022. "Social tipping processes towards climate action: A conceptual framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  85. Farhad Hassan Abdullah, 2020. "Revolution in Egypt: Political Movements and Mobilisation of Resources," Insight on Africa, , vol. 12(1), pages 7-28, January.
  86. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
  87. Richard Cowell & Susan Owens, 2006. "Governing Space: Planning Reform and the Politics of Sustainability," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 403-421, June.
  88. König Pascal D., 2020. "Why Digital-Era Political Marketing is Not the Death Knell for Democracy: On the Importance of Placing Political Microtargeting in the Context of Party Competition," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 87-110, June.
  89. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
  90. Sevgi Balkan Şahin & Marella Bodur Ün, 2022. "Counter-hegemonic struggle and the framing practices of the anti-nuclear platform in Turkey (2002–2018)," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 31-49, February.
  91. Phil Johnstone, 2014. "Planning Reform, Rescaling, and the Construction of the Postpolitical: The Case of the Planning Act 2008 and Nuclear Power Consultation in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 697-713, August.
  92. Brigitte Horváthová & Michael Dobbins, 2019. "Organised Interests in the Energy Sector: A Comparative Study of the Influence of Interest Groups in Czechia and Hungary," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 139-151.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.