IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v186y2025ics0148296324005216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When employees matter: How employee resource groups and workforce liberalism jointly spur firms to support Pro-LGBTQ legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Selling, Niels
  • de Bakker, Frank G.A.

Abstract

Employees are increasingly vocal about and attentive toward their organizations’ social policies and practices. Scholars have identified two main channels through which employees influence responsible business conduct: (1) employee activists proactively shaping corporate decisions and (2) the prevailing worldviews and attitudes of the workforce, which create normative pressure on appropriate corporate behavior. We propose that these two channels interact to produce high levels of employee influence. To assess this hypothesis, we examined corporate support for the Equality Act, a US congressional bill prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Our quantitative analysis shows that firms with both LGBTQ employee resource groups and liberal workforces were more likely to endorse the Equality Act. Qualitative methods then allowed us to pinpoint the underlying mechanisms. Thus, our study expands our understanding of what enables employees to advance responsible business conduct and why firms engage in sociopolitical issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Selling, Niels & de Bakker, Frank G.A., 2025. "When employees matter: How employee resource groups and workforce liberalism jointly spur firms to support Pro-LGBTQ legislation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:186:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324005216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005216
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:186:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324005216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.