IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb475/200809.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal designs for dose finding experiments in toxicity studies

Author

Listed:
  • Dette, Holger
  • Pepelyshev, Andrey
  • Wong, Weng Kee

Abstract

We construct optimal designs for estimating fetal malformation rate, prenatal death rate and an overall toxicity index in a toxicology study under a broad range of model assumptions. We use Weibull distributions to model these rates and assume that the number of implants depend on the dose level. We study properties of the optimal designs when the intra-litter correlation coefficient depends on the dose levels in different ways. Locally optimal designs are found, along with robustified versions of the designs that are less sensitive to mis-specification in the nominal values of the model parameters. We also report e?ciencies of commonly used designs in toxicological experiments and efficiencies of the proposed optimal designs when the true rates have non-Weibull distributions. Optimal design strategies for ?nding multiple-objective designs in toxicology studies are outlined as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Dette, Holger & Pepelyshev, Andrey & Wong, Weng Kee, 2008. "Optimal designs for dose finding experiments in toxicity studies," Technical Reports 2008,09, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/36583/1/600066363.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Krewski & Y. Zhu, 1995. "A Simple Data Transformation for Estimating Benchmark Doses in Developmental Toxicity Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 29-39, February.
    2. Y. Zhu & D. Krewski & W. H. Ross, 1994. "Dose‐Response Models for Correlated Multinomial Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(4), pages 583-598, December.
    3. Mirjam Moerbeek & Aldert H. Piersma & Wout Slob, 2004. "A Comparison of Three Methods for Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Benchmark Dose," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 31-40, February.
    4. Holger Dette, 1997. "Designing Experiments with Respect to ‘Standardized’ Optimality Criteria," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(1), pages 97-110.
    5. Jim Giles, 2006. "Animal experiments under fire for poor design," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7122), pages 981-981, December.
    6. Obaid M. Al-Saidy & Walter W. Piegorsch & R. Webster West & Daniela K. Nitcheva, 2003. "Confidence Bands for Low-Dose Risk Estimation with Quantal Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1056-1062, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dette, Holger & Pepelyshev, Andrey & Shpilev, Piter & Wong, Weng Kee, 2009. "Optimal designs for estimating critical effective dose under model uncertainty in a dose response study," Technical Reports 2009,07, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    2. Jiajing Xu & Guosheng Yin & David Ohlssen & Frank Bretz, 2016. "Bayesian two-stage dose finding for cytostatic agents via model adaptation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(3), pages 465-482, April.
    3. Dette, Holger & Pepelyshev, Andrey & Shpilev, Piter & Wong, Weng Kee, 2009. "Optimal designs for estimating critical effective dose under model uncertainty in a dose response study," Technical Reports 2009,09, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    4. Holger Dette & Laura Hoyden & Sonja Kuhnt & Kirsten Schorning, 2017. "Optimal designs for thermal spraying," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 53-72, January.
    5. Dette, Holger & Holland-Letz, Tim, 2008. "A geometric characterization of c-optimal designs for heteroscedastic regression," Technical Reports 2008,26, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    6. Bretz, Frank & Dette, Holger & Pinheiro, José, 2008. "Practical considerations for optimal designs in clinical dose finding studies," Technical Reports 2008,22, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela K. Nitcheva & Walter W. Piegorsch & R. Webster West & Ralph L. Kodell, 2005. "Multiplicity-Adjusted Inferences in Risk Assessment: Benchmark Analysis with Quantal Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 277-286, March.
    2. Daniel Krewski & Robert Smythe & Karen Y. Fung, 2002. "Optimal Designs for Estimating the Effective Dose in Developmental Toxicity Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 1195-1205, December.
    3. Walter W. Piegorsch, 2010. "Translational benchmark risk analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 653-667, July.
    4. Walter W. Piegorsch & R. Webster West, 2005. "Benchmark Analysis: Shopping with Proper Confidence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 913-920, August.
    5. Signe M. Jensen & Felix M. Kluxen & Christian Ritz, 2019. "A Review of Recent Advances in Benchmark Dose Methodology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(10), pages 2295-2315, October.
    6. Gupta, Ramesh C. & Wang, Na, 2009. "Estimation of extra risk and benchmark dose in dose–response models," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(7), pages 2036-2050.
    7. Karen Y. Fung & Leonora Marro & Daniel Krewski, 1998. "A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Benchmark Dose Based on Overdispersed Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 329-342, June.
    8. Dennis Schmidt & Rainer Schwabe, 2015. "On optimal designs for censored data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 237-257, April.
    9. Lenka Filová & Mária Trnovská & Radoslav Harman, 2012. "Computing maximin efficient experimental designs using the methods of semidefinite programming," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(5), pages 709-719, July.
    10. Dette, Holger & O'Brien, Timothy E., 2003. "Efficient experimental design for the Behrens-Fisher problem with application to bioassay," Technical Reports 2003,21, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    11. Harman, Radoslav & Jurík, Tomás, 2008. "Computing c-optimal experimental designs using the simplex method of linear programming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 247-254, December.
    12. Dette, Holger & Melas, Viatcheslav B. & Pepelyshev, Andrey, 2006. "Optimal designs for free knot least squares splines," Technical Reports 2006,34, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    13. Li, Guanghui & Zhang, Chongqi, 2017. "The pseudo component transformation design for experiment with mixture," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 19-24.
    14. John F. Fox & Karen A. Hogan & Allen Davis, 2017. "Dose‐Response Modeling with Summary Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 905-917, May.
    15. Andrew S. Allen & Huiman X. Barnhart, 2002. "Joint Models for Toxicology Studies with Dose‐Dependent Number of Implantations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 1165-1173, December.
    16. Dette, Holger & Pepelyshev, Andrey & Zhigljavsky, Anatoly, 2014. "‘Nearly’ universally optimal designs for models with correlated observations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1103-1112.
    17. Tekle, Fetene B. & Tan, Frans E.S. & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2008. "Maximin D-optimal designs for binary longitudinal responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5253-5262, August.
    18. Christopher Withers & Saralees Nadarajah, 2012. "Maximum modulus confidence bands," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 811-819, November.
    19. Silvio S. Zocchi & Anthony C. Atkinson, 1999. "Optimum Experimental Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 437-444, June.
    20. R. Webster West & Ralph L. Kodell, 1999. "A Comparison of Methods of Benchmark‐Dose Estimation for Continuous Response Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 453-459, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isdorde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.