IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/202076.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flexible power and hydrogen production: Finding synergy between CCS and variable renewables

Author

Listed:
  • Cloete, Schalk
  • Hirth, Lion

Abstract

Capital-intensive CO2 capture plants become uneconomical at the low running hours implied by a renewables-based power system. To address this challenge, the novel gas switching reforming (GSR) power and hydrogen plant was recently proposed. When electricity is scarce, GSR generates power. When electricity is abundant, rather than shutting down, GSR keeps operating and produces hydrogen instead, maintaining a high capacity factor for all CO2 capture, transport, and storage infrastructure. This study assesses the interplay between this flexible GSR technology and variable renewables using a power system model. The model optimizes investment and hourly dispatch of 13 different technologies to minimize total system costs. Results show that the inclusion of GSR brings substantial benefits relative to conventional CO2 capture. When a CO2 price of €100/ton is implemented, inclusion of GSR increases the optimal wind and solar share from 32% to 47%, lowers total system costs by 8%, and reduces total system emissions from 45 to 4 kgCO2/MWh. In addition, GSR produces clean hydrogen equivalent to about 90% of total electricity demand, which can be used to decarbonize transport and industry. GSR could therefore become a key enabling technology for a decarbonization effort led by wind and solar power.

Suggested Citation

  • Cloete, Schalk & Hirth, Lion, 2019. "Flexible power and hydrogen production: Finding synergy between CCS and variable renewables," EconStor Preprints 202076, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:202076
    Note: Please cite as: Cloete, Schalk & Lion Hirth (2020): “Flexible power and hydrogen production: Finding synergy between CCS and variable renewables”, Energy 192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116671.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/202076/1/GSR%20system-scale%20v15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szima, Szabolcs & Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar & Fogarasi, Szabolcs & Cormos, Ana-Maria & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2019. "Gas switching reforming for flexible power and hydrogen production to balance variable renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 207-219.
    2. Hirth, Lion & Ueckerdt, Falko & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2015. "Integration costs revisited – An economic framework for wind and solar variability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 925-939.
    3. Lion Hirth, 2015. "The Optimal Share of Variable Renewables: How the Variability of Wind and Solar Power affects their Welfare-optimal Deployment," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    4. Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd & van den Broek, Machteld & Zappa, William & Turkenburg, Wim C. & Faaij, André, 2016. "Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 48-74.
    5. Ueckerdt, Falko & Hirth, Lion & Luderer, Gunnar & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2013. "System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 61-75.
    6. Severin Borenstein, 2012. "The Private and Public Economics of Renewable Electricity Generation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(1), pages 67-92, Winter.
    7. Hirth, Lion & Müller, Simon, 2016. "System-friendly wind power," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 51-63.
    8. Lion Hirth, 2013. "The Market Value of Variable Renewables. The Effect of Solar and Wind Power Variability on their Relative Price," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/36, European University Institute.
    9. Ludig, Sylvie & Haller, Markus & Schmid, Eva & Bauer, Nico, 2011. "Fluctuating renewables in a long-term climate change mitigation strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6674-6685.
    10. Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar, 2019. "Efficient hydrogen production with CO2 capture using gas switching reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 372-385.
    11. Hirth, Lion, 2013. "The market value of variable renewables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 218-236.
    12. Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd & van den Broek, Machteld & Seebregts, Ad & Faaij, André, 2015. "Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 107-128.
    13. Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar, 2019. "Gas switching reforming (GSR) for power generation with CO2 capture: Process efficiency improvement studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 757-765.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cloete, Schalk & Ruhnau, Oliver & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Hirth, Lion, 2021. "Blue hydrogen and industrial base products: The future of fossil fuel exporters in a net-zero world," EconStor Preprints 234469, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Alina Ilinova & Natalia Romasheva & Alexey Cherepovitsyn, 2021. "CC(U)S Initiatives: Public Effects and “Combined Value” Performance," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Patel, Ismail & Shah, Adil & Shen, Boyang & Wei, Haigening & Hao, Luning & Hu, Jintao & Wang, Qi & Coombs, Tim, 2023. "Stochastic optimisation and economic analysis of combined high temperature superconducting magnet and hydrogen energy storage system for smart grid applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    4. Cloete, Schalk & Arnaiz del Pozo, Carlos & Jiménez Álvaro, Ángel, 2022. "System-friendly process design: Optimizing blue hydrogen production for future energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Yifan Wang & Laurence A. Wright, 2021. "A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation," World, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Radosław Kaplan & Michał Kopacz, 2020. "Economic Conditions for Developing Hydrogen Production Based on Coal Gasification with Carbon Capture and Storage in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Szabolcs Szima & Carlos Arnaiz del Pozo & Schalk Cloete & Szabolcs Fogarasi & Ángel Jiménez Álvaro & Ana-Maria Cormos & Calin-Cristian Cormos & Shahriar Amini, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of IGCC Power Plants Using Gas Switching Technology to Minimize the Energy Penalty of CO 2 Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Guo, Zhongjie & Wei, Wei & Chen, Laijun & Zhang, Xiaoping & Mei, Shengwei, 2021. "Equilibrium model of a regional hydrogen market with renewable energy based suppliers and transportation costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Badur, Janusz & Pawlak- Kruczek, Halina & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Krochmalny, Krystian & Mularski, Jakub & Madejski, Paweł & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2022. "Mathematical modelling of gasification process of sewage sludge in reactor of negative CO2 emission power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zerrahn, Alexander, 2017. "Wind Power and Externalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 245-260.
    2. Szima, Szabolcs & Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar & Fogarasi, Szabolcs & Cormos, Ana-Maria & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2019. "Gas switching reforming for flexible power and hydrogen production to balance variable renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 207-219.
    3. Odeh, Rodrigo Pérez & Watts, David, 2019. "Impacts of wind and solar spatial diversification on its market value: A case study of the Chilean electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 442-461.
    4. Ruhnau, Oliver & Hirth, Lion & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2020. "Heating with wind: Economics of heat pumps and variable renewables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Reichenberg, Lina & Hedenus, Fredrik & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "The marginal system LCOE of variable renewables – Evaluating high penetration levels of wind and solar in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 914-924.
    6. Romeiro, Diogo Lisbona & Almeida, Edmar Luiz Fagundes de & Losekann, Luciano, 2020. "Systemic value of electricity sources – What we can learn from the Brazilian experience?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Zipp, Alexander, 2017. "The marketability of variable renewable energy in liberalized electricity markets – An empirical analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1111-1121.
    8. Ueckerdt, Falko & Pietzcker, Robert & Scholz, Yvonne & Stetter, Daniel & Giannousakis, Anastasis & Luderer, Gunnar, 2017. "Decarbonizing global power supply under region-specific consideration of challenges and options of integrating variable renewables in the REMIND model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 665-684.
    9. Bistline, John E., 2017. "Economic and technical challenges of flexible operations under large-scale variable renewable deployment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 363-372.
    10. Ueckerdt, Falko & Brecha, Robert & Luderer, Gunnar & Sullivan, Patrick & Schmid, Eva & Bauer, Nico & Böttger, Diana & Pietzcker, Robert, 2015. "Representing power sector variability and the integration of variable renewables in long-term energy-economy models using residual load duration curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1799-1814.
    11. Ren'e Aid & Matteo Basei & Huy^en Pham, 2017. "A McKean-Vlasov approach to distributed electricity generation development," Papers 1705.01302, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
    12. Matsuo, Yuhji & Endo, Seiya & Nagatomi, Yu & Shibata, Yoshiaki & Komiyama, Ryoichi & Fujii, Yasumasa, 2020. "Investigating the economics of the power sector under high penetration of variable renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Eising, Manuel & Hobbie, Hannes & Möst, Dominik, 2020. "Future wind and solar power market values in Germany — Evidence of spatial and technological dependencies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Hirth, Lion, 2016. "The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 210-223.
    15. Sascha Samadi, 2017. "The Social Costs of Electricity Generation—Categorising Different Types of Costs and Evaluating Their Respective Relevance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-37, March.
    16. René Aïd & Matteo Basei & Huyên Pham, 2017. "The coordination of centralised and distributed generation," Working Papers hal-01517165, HAL.
    17. Marshman, Daniel & Brear, Michael & Ring, Brendan, 2022. "Impact of unit commitment and RoCoF constraints on revenue sufficiency in decarbonising wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Soria, Rafael & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Szklo, Alexandre & Milani, Rodrigo & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2015. "Hybrid concentrated solar power (CSP)–biomass plants in a semiarid region: A strategy for CSP deployment in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 57-72.
    19. Khanna, Tarun M., 2022. "Using agricultural demand for reducing costs of renewable energy integration in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    20. Schill, Wolf-Peter, 2014. "Residual Load, Renewable Surplus Generation and Storage Requirements in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73, pages 65-79.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:202076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.