Mathematics as the role model for neoclassical economics (Blanqui Lecture)
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Theodore C. Bergstrom, 2003.
"Vernon Smith's Insomnia and the Dawn of Economics as Experimental Science,"
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 105(2), pages 181-205, June.
- Theodore C. Bergstrom, 2002. "Vernon Smith's Insomnia and the Dawn of Economics as Experimental Science," Microeconomics 0212001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- William C. Brainard & Herbert E. Scarf, 2005.
"How to Compute Equilibrium Prices in 1891,"
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 57-83, January.
- William C. Brainard & Herbert E. Scarf, 2000. "How to Compute Equilibrium Prices in 1891," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1272, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Debreu, Gerard, 1984.
"Economic Theory in the Mathematical Mode,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(3), pages 267-278, June.
- Debreu, Gerard, 1983. "Economic Theory in the Mathematical Mode," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 1983-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
- Nicola Giocoli, 2003. "Modeling Rational Agents," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2585, March.
- Mirowski,Philip, 2002. "Machine Dreams," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521772839, January.
- Quiggin, John, 1982. "A theory of anticipated utility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 323-343, December.
- Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013.
"Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,"
World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127,
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
- Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-291, March.
- Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," Levine's Working Paper Archive 7656, David K. Levine.
- Terence Hutchison, 2000. "On the Methodology of Economics and the Formalist Revolution," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1719, March.
- Nicola Giocoli, 2001. "Fixing the point: the contribution of early game theory to the tool-box of modern economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 1-39.
- Morris Altman, 2004. "The Nobel Prize in behavioral and experimental economics: a contextual and critical appraisal of the contributions of Daniel Kahneman and Cernon Smith," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 3-41.
- Nicola Giocoli, 2003. "History of economics becomes a science for cyborgs," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 11(2), pages 109-127.
- Olav Bjerkholt (ed.), 1995. "Foundations of Modern Econometrics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, volume 0, number 46, March.
- Mirowski,Philip, 2002. "Machine Dreams," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521775267, January.
- Chris Starmer, 2000. "Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 332-382, June.
- Smith, Vernon L, 1985. "Experimental Economics: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 264-272, March.
- Vernon Smith, 2005. "Hayek and Experimental Economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 135-144, June.
- Michael V. White, 2004. "In the Lobby of the Energy Hotel: Jevons's Formulation of the Postclassical “Economic Problemâ€," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 227-271, Summer.
- Ortmann, Andreas, 2003. "Charles R. Plott's collected papers on the experimental foundations of economic and political science," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 555-575, August.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Giocoli, Nicola, 2008. "Three alternative (?) stories on the late 20th-century rise of game theory," MPRA Paper 33808, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Nicola Giocoli, 2013.
"Games judges don't play: predatory pricing and strategic reasoning in US antitrust,"
Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 271-330.
- Giocoli, Nicola, 2010. "Games judges don't play: predatory pricing and strategic reasoning in US antitrust," MPRA Paper 33810, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Egil Matsen & Bjarne Strøm, 2006.
"Joker: Choice in a simple game with large stakes,"
Working Paper Series
8307, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
- Egil Matsen & Bjarne Strom, 2006. "Joker: Choice in a simple game with large stakes," Natural Field Experiments 00236, The Field Experiments Website.
- Simone Cerreia‐Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro Ortoleva, 2015.
"Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 693-728, March.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro Ortoleva, 2013. "Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect," PIER Working Paper Archive 13-037, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro Ortoleva, 2014. "Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-005, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro ortoleva, 2013. "Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect," Working Papers 488, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Bocqueho, Geraldine & Jacquet, Florence & Reynaud, Arnaud, 2011. "Expected Utility or Prospect Theory Maximizers? Results from a Structural Model based on Field-experiment Data," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114257, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
- Luís Santos-Pinto & Adrian Bruhin & José Mata & Thomas Åstebro, 2015.
"Detecting heterogeneous risk attitudes with mixed gambles,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 573-600, December.
- Astebro , Thomas & Santos-Pinto , Luís, 2014. "Detecting Heterogeneous Risk Attitudes with Mixed Gambles," HEC Research Papers Series 1042, HEC Paris.
- Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet E., 2014.
"Dual criteria decisions,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 101-113.
- Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet, 2009. "Dual Criteria Decisions," Working Papers 02-2009, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
- Chiu, W. Henry, 2019. "Comparative statics in an ordinal theory of choice under risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 113-123.
- Mohammed Abdellaoui & Horst Zank, 2023. "Source and rank-dependent utility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(4), pages 949-981, May.
- Riddel, Mary C. & Shaw, W. Douglass, 2006. "A Theoretically-Consistent Empirical Non-Expected Utility Model of Ambiguity: Nuclear Waste Mortality Risk and Yucca Mountain," Pre-Prints 23964, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
- Gul, Faruk & Pesendorfer, Wolfgang, 2015. "Hurwicz expected utility and subjective sources," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 159(PA), pages 465-488.
- Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2020.
"Discriminating Between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: a Qualitative Test,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 708-749.
- Sujoy Mukerji & Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2014. "Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test," Economics Series Working Papers 692, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2017. "Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test," Working Papers 831, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
- Galarza, Francisco, 2009.
"Choices under Risk in Rural Peru,"
MPRA Paper
17708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Francisco Galarza, 2009. "Choices under risk in rural peru," Artefactual Field Experiments 00047, The Field Experiments Website.
- Galarza, Francisco B., 2009. "Choices under Risk in Rural Peru," Staff Paper Series 542, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
- Galarza, Francisco B., 2009. "Choices under Risk in Rural Peru," Staff Papers 92247, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
- Vjollca Sadiraj, 2014.
"Probabilistic risk attitudes and local risk aversion: a paradox,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 443-454, December.
- Vjollca Sadiraj, 2012. "Probabilistic Risk Attitudes and Local Risk Aversion: a Paradox," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2012-07, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
- Aluma Dembo & Shachar Kariv & Matthew Polisson & John Quah, 2021.
"Ever since Allais,"
IFS Working Papers
W21/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Aluma Dembo & Shachar Kariv & Matthew Polisson & John K.-H. Quah, 2021. "Ever Since Allais," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 21/745, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Serge Blondel & Louis Lévy-garboua, 2011.
"Can non-expected utility theories explain the paradox of not voting?,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(4), pages 3158-3168.
- Serge Blondel & Louis Lévy-Garboua, 2011. "Can non-expected utility theories explain the paradox of not voting?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-01476363, HAL.
- Serge Blondel & Louis Lévy-Garboua, 2011. "Can non-expected utility theories explain the paradox of not voting?," Post-Print hal-01476363, HAL.
- Serge Blondel & Louis Lévy-Garboua, 2011. "Can non-expected utility theories explain the paradox of not voting?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01476363, HAL.
- Latifa Ghalayini & Dana Deeb, 2021. "Utility Measurement in Integrative Negotiation," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15.
- Kliger, Doron & Levy, Ori, 2008. "Mood impacts on probability weighting functions: "Large-gamble" evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1397-1411, August.
- Michal Skořepa, 2007. "Zpochybnění deskriptivnosti teorie očekávaného užitku [Doubts about the descriptive validity of the expected utility theory]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 106-120.
- Jakusch, Sven Thorsten & Meyer, Steffen & Hackethal, Andreas, 2019. "Taming models of prospect theory in the wild? Estimation of Vlcek and Hens (2011)," SAFE Working Paper Series 146, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2019.
- Ehsan Taheri & Chen Wang, 2018. "Eliciting Public Risk Preferences in Emergency Situations," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 223-241, December.
- Dohmen, Thomas & Quercia, Simone & Willrodt, Jana, 2018.
"Willingness to Take Risk: The Role of Risk Conception and Optimism,"
IZA Discussion Papers
11642, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Thomas Dohmen & Simone Quercia & Jana Willrodt, 2019. "Willingness to Take Risk: The Role of Risk Conception and Optimism," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1026, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
- Thomas Dohmen & Simone Quercia & Jana Willrodt, 2018. "Willingness to take risk: The role of risk conception and optimism," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_023, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Thomas Dohmen & Simone Quercia & Jana Willrodt, 2018. "Willingness to take risk: The role of risk conception and optimism," Working Papers 2018-056, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
More about this item
Keywords
Axiomatic method; formalism; rationality; neoclassical economics;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
- C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
- B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:33806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.