IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/121965.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The régulation of the corporate welfare policy. Evidences from France

Author

Listed:
  • Klebaner, Samuel

Abstract

The aim of this article is to demonstrate that the “Corporate Welfare” policies are embedded in a complex, dynamic and unstable mode of regulation. Based on qualitative and quantitative evidences from France since the 2008 financial crisis, we identify the five canonical institutional forms derived from the Régulation Theory that are coherent with industrial policies in favour of corporation without any counterparts. We consider that the deindustrialisation, the wage moderation, the fragmentation of national value chains is at the beginning of a race to the bottom of the public policy to compensate the profit loss. Behind the transfer of funds, we show that there is also a transfer of power to corporations, especially on the social welfare system. Finally, we will consider that this system is compatible as long as public debt creditors accepts to finance the difference between the quick transfers to corporations and the slow reduction of public expenditures, and second, that household have political and financial capacity to support this system.

Suggested Citation

  • Klebaner, Samuel, 2024. "The régulation of the corporate welfare policy. Evidences from France," MPRA Paper 121965, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121965/1/MPRA_paper_121965.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2023. "Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-031-17674-6, October.
    2. Bruno Amable & Lilas Demmou & Ivan Ledezma, 2009. "The Lisbon strategy and structural reforms in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 15(1), pages 33-52, February.
    3. Samuel Klebaner & Matthieu Montalban, 2020. "Cross-Fertilizations Between Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology: The Case of Régulation Theory and the Sociology of Fields," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 180-198, April.
    4. Mehrdad Vahabi & Philippe Batifoulier & Nicolas Silva, 2020. "A theory of predatory welfare state and citizen welfare: the French case," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 243-271, March.
    5. Richard A. Posner, 1974. "Theories of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 5(2), pages 335-358, Autumn.
    6. Karl Aiginger, 2007. "Industrial Policy: A Dying Breed or A Re-emerging Phoenix," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 297-323, December.
    7. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2023. "Conceptualizing Destructive Coordination," Springer Books, in: Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism, chapter 3, pages 73-103, Springer.
    8. Fligstein, Neil, 2001. "Social Skill and the Theory of Fields," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt26m187b1, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6926 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ken Warwick, 2013. "Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Weiss & Adnan Seric, 2021. "Industrial policy: Clarifying options through taxonomy and decision trees," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 773-788, September.
    2. Constantino Hevia & Norman V. Loayza & Claudia Meza-Cuadra, 2023. "Industrial Policies vs Public Goods under Asymmetric Information," Revista Economía, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, vol. 46(91), pages 39-52.
    3. Karl Aiginger, 2014. "Industrial Policy for a Sustainable Growth Path," WIFO Working Papers 469, WIFO.
    4. Michael Böheim, 2016. "Umweltpolitik als Kernelement einer systemischen Industriepolitik zur Förderung eines nachhaltigen Wirtschaftswachstums," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(1), pages 39-46, January.
    5. Tariq Basir & Ilia Murtazashvili & Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili, 2024. "Institutional stickiness and Afghanistan’s unending revolution," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 403-422, September.
    6. Christian Ketels, 2015. "Competitiveness and Clusters: Implications for a New European Growth Strategy. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 84," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57892, January.
    7. Vahabi, Mehrdad & Klebaner, Samuel, 2023. "Une nouvelle perspective sur la prédation, le conflit, le capitalisme et le changement institutionne (Une évaluation critique de l’école de régulation), entretien de Mehrdad Vahabi avec Samuel Klebane," MPRA Paper 119567, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. S. Sinelnikov-Murylev & A. Radygin & L. Freinkman & N. Glavatskaya (ed.), 2014. "RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN 2013 Trends and Outlooks (Issue 35)," Books, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, edition 1, volume 35, number 5, February.
    9. Michael Peneder & Gerhard Streicher, 2016. "De- versus Re-industrialisation: Is Structural Change Reversible?," WIFO Working Papers 506, WIFO.
    10. Yuri Simachev & Mikhail Kuzyk & Boris Kuznetsov & Evgeniy Pogrebnyak, 2014. "Russia on the path towards a new technology industrial policy: Exciting prospects and Fatal Traps," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(4 (eng)), pages 6-23.
    11. Alexander Ebner & Fabian Bocek, 2015. "Best Practices as to How to Support Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 101," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58258, January.
    12. Shastitko, Andrei (Шаститко, Андрей), 2014. "Why do we need competition policy, if there is a commercial one? [Зачем Конкурентная Политика, Если Есть Промышленная?]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 42-59.
    13. Karl Aiginger, 2014. "Industrial Policy for a Sustainable Growth Path. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 13," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47261, January.
    14. Michael Böheim, 2013. "Zur Renaissance der Industriepolitik. Ein neuer umfassender Politikansatz oder nur alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen?," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 86(12), pages 953-960, December.
    15. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    16. Magnus Söderberg, 2008. "Uncertainty and regulatory outcome in the Swedish electricity distribution sector," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-94, February.
    17. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Lehr, William & Sicker, Douglas, 2017. "Communications Act 2021," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169478, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    20. Ando, Amy, 1998. "Delay on the Path to the Endangered Species List: Do Costs and Benefits Matter," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-43-rev, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Régulation ; Corporate welfare ; France;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • L53 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Enterprise Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.